User talk:Helikophis

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place  before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! VanTucky 18:32, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Nice copyediting
Thanks for the excellent work you've been doing copyediting various Wikipedia articles, including some plant articles. KP Botany 22:05, 26 June 2007 (UTC)


 * You're welcome. I'll try to keep at it! Helikophis 16:38, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Yoga?
Yoga is a Sanskrit word, Tao Yin is a Mandarin term for a Chinese discipline. Is Taijiquan yoga? Do we edit the yoga article to say that it is qigong? If Tao Yin were Buddhist instead of Taoist, there may be a case for calling it by a Sanskrit name, but it isn't. Also, saying "look it up on the web" in an edit summary doesn't satisfy WP:REF. I don't want this to digress into a pointless argument, so if we can't agree we may file a WP:Request for comment on the issue to get more editors involved in the discussion. --Bradeos Graphon Βραδέως Γράφων (talk) 14:35, 5 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Yoga is also an English word! It's in the OED.  I'm reasonably sure that Tao Yin satisfies the meaning of the _English_ word yoga quite thoroughly.  But I'm also not interested in a pointless argument.  I would certainly not have reverted your revert if you had simply removed the word you disagreed with, but you just reverted to a previous edit which was rather more inaccurate than the current one (e.g. it strongly suggests that Tao Yin is a historical practice and not a current one).  I do stand by the fact that Tao Yin qualifies in every way as yoga, but if you really don't want that word there, take it out.  Helikophis (talk) 15:13, 5 February 2008 (UTC)


 * I've since added one ref to the Tao Yin article, and a couple of fact tags (which I am trying to dig up some info on). Here's a thought, if you can get a cite to a book or article that mentions someone calling it yoga or a form of yoga, Mantak Chia for example, we could mention it second person, so to speak. --Bradeos Graphon Βραδέως Γράφων (talk) 18:08, 5 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Okay, I'll look around and see what I can do!Helikophis (talk) 20:08, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Naked Mole Rat
I know that trivia sections are discouraged but I do believe that "In popular culture" sections are allowed, are they not? SyBer WoLff 16:37, 8 April 2008 (UTC)


 * I suppose that they are. They do seem to be quite common, and the page on triva sections specifically mentions them. This one seemed particularly irrelevant to me, and I felt it detracted from the article.  But if you really want it there, go ahead and put it back in.    Helikophis (talk) 16:42, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Cannibalism article
Apologies. I mistakenly reverted a recent edit you made to the Cannibalism article as vandalism. I intended to revert vandalism to another article which I had open in a different browser tab, and was too quick in clicking WP:Twinkle's Vandal selection. I've re-reverted my mistaken reversion. Sorry. -- Boracay Bill (talk) 23:02, 21 April 2008 (UTC)


 * No problem! Thanks for letting me know.  - Helikophis (talk) 14:05, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

comment on Assyrian People discussion
Hello, I read your comment on the discussion on Assyrian People and I very much agree with you. If it is not too much trouble I would want you to read on in current developments and once again place your input. I have responded to the claims in discussions of Assyrian population and Assyrians (also known as Chaldeans and Syriacs). I believe that I have put my point across and supported it with many reliable sources, with only response being that I am a nationalist and giving me a Turkish Source (which are recognized as not very reliable sources ... especially with their minority populations). I would really appreciate any input you have in those discussions. I will soon change some things on the page on the grounds which I said on the discussion. I am new with the whole wikipedia thing (because I am strongly against its bias ... Assyrian people page being an example) and do not know much about it. Thank-you for your time Malik Danno (talk) 02:33, 18 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Hello, sorry to bother you again but this issue about the Assyrian peoples page does not want to go away. I feel that it is a couple of nationalists who threaten to make such pages bias for their personal side. This is not what wikipedia is about (I hope). There is constant edits without credible sources and constant vandalism of pages. I am all for getting to a resolution but when one side does not want to co-operate like the other side does then what is the one side suppose to do? Throughout the discussions you have most likely heard of responses such as "your stupid" and other immature comments like that. This is not a proper discussion that you yourself want to take place. Many titles have been changed from "Assyrians in (Iraq, Iran, Syria etc.)" to "Assyrians and Syriacs in (etc.)" I would not mind this if there was a discussion before such a change occurred. This constant vandalism on Assyrian related pages is committed by the same people on wikipedia. This has got to stop. If it is not too much trouble can you help settle this problem and get other Wikipedia people involved in this matter. Also can you tell me how I can propose a ban of certain members of Wikipedia who abuse the system?
 * Thank-you - Malik Danno (talk) 19:39, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Differences between Slovak and Czech languages


The article Differences between Slovak and Czech languages has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Un reverenced, possibly WP:OR

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Codf1977 (talk) 12:51, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference
Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to  in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 18:48, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)