User talk:Hell Hawk

March 2010
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 02:17, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I am going to revert your removal because you clearly don't want it there. There was consensus on the talk page for keeping it and I saw that you didn't agree with it being there. Doing this against a consensus is counterproductive. Please don't revert it as I will happily start a discussion on the talk page of the article with you. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 02:31, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The fact that you weren't giving a summary followed the lines of typical vandalism. Because I didn't know your intentions, I assumed the worst. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 02:44, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry for assuming that. Still, you should provide an edit summary. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 02:52, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 03:28, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. yandman 13:16, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

List of ancient monoliths
Your latest revert is WP:Circular. Look, I have put much effort and thought into creating the list. Do you seriously believe I would just stand by and watch how you start a little edit war without you having a real grasp of the topic? Then you probably also believe that Micky Mouse was a Communist spy. Gun Powder Ma (talk) 08:43, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

Lil Peep
Hi Hell Hawk,

I reverted your edit on Lil Peep, but pressed save before I could explain the edit summary.

The Swedish part of the subject's ethnicity/nationality had a reference attached to it. Which suggests that it is legitimate. So if you disagree, it'd be better to discuss it on the talk page first, or at least explain your reasoning on the talk page.

Cheers, seb26 (talk) 10:21, 28 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Look at the history. Oh what's that?  You were WRONG? Hell Hawk (talk) 07:39, 30 March 2018 (UTC)