User talk:HenriettaVanLaer

It is quite unconvincing to assert that Wikipedia has a "neutral point of view". It is actually overwhelmingly biassed and run by people who put their own views as "facts" while censoring anyone else's as "opinions". You are a clique who kid yourselves that you are being detached and objective. When anyone points it out, you simply resort to censorship. *************** HenriettaVanLaer (talk) 17:52, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia has a very clear and prominent agenda [pro-socialists, liberals, greens and gays, determined to vilify and demonize conservatives]. It is a completely biassed website. Its articles on so-called left-wing parties are blatant whitewash while those on so-called right-wing parties are nothing but vilification. The frequent denials that you have a point of view or that you are biassed are not at all convincing, particularly since the whole slant is maintained by a policy of rigorous censorship (which you call being "blocked".) POV in Wiki-speak = different POV to us, the Wiki-police. I am resigning and closing this page down because Wikipedia is a fundamentally dishonest enterprise. It cannot be called an encyclopaedia as it is so biassed, unreliable and willing to distort facts.

May 2010
Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did to Nick Clegg, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Favonian (talk) 21:40, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Nick Clegg, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ''Your actions are now seriously disrupting the project and you will be blocked the next time it happens. You have to engage in discussion, that's how it works here.''  raseaC talk to me 22:10, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for '''For disruptive editing, consisting mainly of addition of biased material without consensus, and general attacks on other editors. Since I am one of the editors who has been involved in trying to persuade you to follow our standards here, I will report this block to the Administrators' Noticeboard for independent review. I suggest you take a step back for a little while pending that review, and before requesting an unblock here.'''. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Rodhull andemu  00:19, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The discussion on ANI is here. Other editors will review this block, and your editing. If you wish to make a comment there, you may do so here and I will copy your comments there. Rodhull  andemu  00:30, 21 May 2010 (UTC)