User talk:Herzi Pinki

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place  after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! - Darwinek 09:24, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

El bot de la dieta
Hi

Bots aren't humans and errors happens. My bot use the interwiki.py from pywikipedia framework, all bots that use pywikipedia framework will restore the wrong interwikis. We have to wait until the bug will be fixed. :( --Kontrol Z (talk) 12:55, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
 * thanks, I have changed now all the interwiki pages, hope that will help.
 * The bug, you are mentioning above, is the wrong interwiki, right? Not that the bot does not respect user changes regarding interwikis. So you have to know where the source of the error is, in this case in es:Lago Verde, and fix it there? --Herzi Pinki (talk) 13:10, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Flathead lake
Category:Flathead lake, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. -- Black Falcon (talk) 03:13, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

AddCommonsCatLinks
Hi, and sorry for the long response time. I have been away from editing for a while and just came back about a week ago. I had several things to catch up on before I could address the concerns you brought up at my talk page. I have now fixed the problem with the bot at de:Liste der denkmalgeschützten Objekte in Bichlbach by allowing multiple row templates to be used on the same page. As a result, though, now the "RowMismatch" text in the GUI must not reference a single row template like it did before. The GUI text previously included the text "ROWTEMPLATE" that would be replaced with the actual row template in use on the page, but now since there can in general be multiple row templates on one page, I have changed the wording of the English GUI to reflect that. Could you possibly update the German GUI? Could you possibly replace the ROWTEMPLATE bit to match what I've done with the English?
 * The English text is "Row mismatch! This is probably due to an incorrectly formatted row template. All row templates must include class='vcard' in order for this script to identify them. If the row template(s) on this page include class='vcard', please let me know at :en:User_talk:Dudemanfellabra, and I will try to resolve the problem. The script will now exit itself. Sorry!"
 * The current German text is "Zeilenfehler! Dies kommt möglicherweise von einer falsch formatierten Zeilenvorlage. Alle Zeilenvorlagen müssen class='vcard' enthalten, damit das Skript sie identifizieren kann. Sollte class='vcard' beinhalten, bitte ich um eine Nachricht auf :en:User_talk:Dudemanfellabra, und ich werde versuchen, das Problem zu beheben. Das Skript wird jetzt beendet."

Also, I still haven't looked into the solution we were discussing before to be able to treat multiple commons templates on the same image/category. I am still open to the idea, but I have a few other things I'm doing at the moment and don't have enough time to devote to that in the near future.--Dudemanfellabra (talk) 02:59, 5 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Also, could you translate this string for a new invalid category situation I have added to the code?:
 * "Invalid":"The existing image and/or category cannot be found on Commons. Selecting a match here will replace the existing one(s). If you do not want to replace anything, choose Do not add any category/image."
 * Thanks!--Dudemanfellabra (talk) 19:02, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Hi Dudemanfellabra, I would be glad if I can help you.

first text:
 * "Zeilenfehler! Dies kommt möglicherweise von einer falsch formatierten Zeilenvorlage. Alle Zeilenvorlagen müssen class='vcard' enthalten, damit das Skript sie identifizieren kann. Sollte Sollten die Zeilenvorlagen auf dieser Seite bereits class='vcard' beinhalten, bitte ich um eine Nachricht auf :en:User_talk:Dudemanfellabra, und ich werde versuchen, das Problem zu beheben. Das Skript wird jetzt beendet."

The second text in English already has a flaw. It is not the existing image, as it does not exist on Commons. My proposal (but you should adopt the English of course): As you know the context, you can add the name of the image / category (correctly liked?) to the error message? This will make it much clearer. A question on the implementation, to be sure (as image and category can be combined and usually are): Does this work when the image is missing, the category is missing or both are missing? I would also toggle the order category/image to image/category in the error message.
 * "Invalid":"The existing image and/or category … cannot be found on Commons. Selecting a match here will replace the existing one(s). If you do not want to replace anything, choose Do not add replace any category/image."

My translation (not stuck completely to the original text): Bild/Kategorie nicht ersetzen is the label for the button.
 * "Invalid":"Das Bild und/oder die Kategorie … existieren nicht auf Commons. Du kannst hier ein neues Bild und/oder eine neue Kategorie auswählen. Ansonsten wähle Bild/Kategorie nicht ersetzen."

kr --Herzi Pinki (talk) 13:32, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the translation, but I will wait until you respond again to implement it. As the script is set up right now, the name of the image/cat is not displayable when displaying this text, so I was trying to avoid including the name directly. The reason for my use of the word "existing" is to express that the invalid image/cat was already included in the template before the script began running. Maybe "existing" isn't such a good word, but I can't think of a good replacement.. maybe to clarify it should be "The pre-existing cat/image"? "The cat/image currently in use"? "The previously incorporated cat/image"? Can you think of a better synonym/phrase?
 * As for the mechanics, this is encountered if either or both a category and an image that was already there before the script was run and if there was a replacement found. If no replacement is found, the script silently skips the invalid cat/image. It has been suggested by another editor to give the user the option of removing the invalid cat/image even if a match is not found, and that may be implemented in the future, but it is not currently an option.--Dudemanfellabra (talk) 04:24, 7 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Hi, to my non-native ears the phrase "The cat/image currently in use" sounds best and most simple. It expresses the situation much better than before. This then will change my translation to
 * "Invalid":"Das verwendete Bild und/oder die verwendete Kategorie existieren nicht auf Commons. Du kannst hier ein neues Bild und/oder eine neue Kategorie auswählen. Ansonsten wähle Bild/Kategorie nicht ersetzen."
 * Bild/Kategorie nicht ersetzen is the label for the button.
 * BTW, I would appreciate a possibility to remove non-existing cat/images even if there is no replacement. Otherwise I would have to check for red links manually (for cats the situation is a bit different, as non-existing cats are perfect in case we expect a lot of images to come soon, but non existing images will not come into existence, they have to be replaced anyway)
 * --Herzi Pinki (talk) 06:51, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Picture of {Petersfield Church
Hi Bashereyre, can you please add proper identification / categories to File:CrcifxStP1010002.JPG. best --Herzi Pinki (talk) 11:43, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi Herzi I would not know how to do this can you tell me how Bashereyre (talk) 19:11, 7 March 2021 (UTC)


 * You gave me the necessary info in your caption here. It was difficult to guess what church File:CrcifxStP1010002.JPG did show. See my changes . I added a meaningful description and a category for the church building. it is ok now. best --Herzi Pinki (talk) 19:22, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)