User talk:Historyandsciencelearn

Speedy deletion nomination of Alex of Krya Vrysi


A tag has been placed on Alex of Krya Vrysi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:56, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Living people
Hi and welcome to Wikipedia.

I thought I might point you towards Wikipedia's guidelines regarding biographies of living people. Any claim that is possibly contentious has to be backed up by reliable secondary sources. That means Wikipedia doesn't include accusations or allegations unless reported by reliable, published secondary sources such as newspapers. Wikipedia also doesn't report what internet celebrities have said about a person unless reported by reliable, published secondary sources such as newspapers. Unlike most other websites, Wikipedia doesn't include original research.

If you have questions about editing, do feel free to come ask at the Teahouse.

– Thjarkur (talk) 19:47, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Could you perhaps clarify your intention with your article on "Alex of Krya Vrysi"? The article has been tagged for deletion as a blatant hoax. Do any of your other contributions here contain incorrect information? – Thjarkur (talk) 19:56, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

I do not think that I have made any mistakes in other cases. I am not sure about this case because I generally make articles about the ancient history and pre history, for example you can check my new article about a pre historic culture. My intention is to not make any further edits on this article, I think that I have finished with it. Historyandsciencelearn (talk) 11:10, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

April 2021
Hello, I'm Bentogoa. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Woman—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Bentogoa (talk) 16:21, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

Hi, I did it by mistake. I wanted to take a screenshot and the "power of habit" caused problems. I was about to delete it. Best Wishes from Greece :) Historyandsciencelearn (talk) 16:24, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Your explanation doesn't jive with your edits. If it was a mistake, explain this absurd edit to the same articles talk page, after you responded to above.  TAXIDICAE💰  16:41, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

Explain what ? I simply checked the "talks" and it seems that it is pretty chaotic so I wrote it. Historyandsciencelearn (talk) 16:45, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
 * No, you're using talk pages as a forum for rambling about unrelated stuff. Stop. TAXIDICAE💰  16:48, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

Me ? Wow... Simply saying to not be fanatical is so bad... Oh. Historyandsciencelearn (talk) 16:54, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

Pelasgians and modern science moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Pelasgians and modern science, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. – Thjarkur (talk) 20:19, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi. It's likely not necessary to split content about theories about the origins of the Pelasgians to a new article yet, but the reason the article was moved to drafts is because it appears to be original research/synthesis (judging from the sources that are available online). The Nature source does not mention Pelasgians. There are very few subjects where "the modern study of X" is noteworthy enough for a seperate article. – Thjarkur (talk) 20:27, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

Yes Historyandsciencelearn (talk) 07:08, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Korakou culture moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Korakou culture, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  Onel 5969  TT me 18:45, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Petros Piotr L


A tag has been placed on Petros Piotr L requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Fram (talk) 07:26, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

June 2021


A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. Fram (talk) 07:29, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

Attack page ?!?!?! Historyandsciencelearn (talk) 07:32, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Hypaspist 1 (UCAV) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hypaspist 1 (UCAV) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Hypaspist 1 (UCAV) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Eostrix  (&#x1F989; hoot hoot&#x1F989;) 11:20, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Hypaspist 1 (UCAV)


Please do not create hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at Hypaspist 1 (UCAV). Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Qwaiiplayer (talk) 12:18, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Mesolithic Greece
Hello, Historyandsciencelearn. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mesolithic Greece, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:02, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Korakou culture
Hello, Historyandsciencelearn. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Korakou culture, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:02, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Korakou culture


Hello, Historyandsciencelearn. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Korakou culture".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:05, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

December 2021
Welcome to Wikipedia. Unfortunately, content you added to a Wikipedia article appears to be a minority or fringe viewpoint, and appears to have given undue weight to this minority viewpoint, and has been reverted. To maintain a neutral point of view, an idea that is not broadly supported by scholarship in its field must not be given undue weight in an article about a mainstream idea. Feel free to use the article's talk page to discuss this, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 12:54, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

Alexandros of Krya Vrysi moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Alexandros of Krya Vrysi, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DMySon (talk) 15:04, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

WP:ANI discussion
I have started a proposal to indefinitely block you, at WP:ANI. Fram (talk) 08:30, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

December 2021


A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. Fram (talk) 08:31, 13 December 2021 (UTC)


 * You have at several times created unsourced or poorly sourced articles creating minors, and appear to have made no positive contributions. —Kusma (talk) 10:56, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. —Kusma (talk) 10:55, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Pelasgians and modern science
Hello, Historyandsciencelearn. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Pelasgians and modern science, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:02, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Mesolithic Greece


Hello, Historyandsciencelearn. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mesolithic Greece".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 01:10, 26 January 2022 (UTC)