User talk:Humblefool

File permission problem with File:Iichanscreenshot.png
Thanks for uploading File:Iichanscreenshot.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 08:30, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:17, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

"For historical reasons"
That's plural, indicating more than one reason. So to change "for historical reason" to "for historical reasons" is changing content, it is not a grammar issue at all. (You disagree!?) --IHTS (talk) 05:01, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
 * "For historical reasons" is a stock phrase, and can refer to anything that is the way it is because of some known-but-no-longer-relevant reason or reasons. "For historical reason it is..." is ungrammatical; at the very least, it's a prepositional phrase that should be offset with a comma. "Historically, it is..." would be acceptable. (The sentence in question has been already been rewritten to "It is traditionally..." which is probably better anyway.) So yes, I do disagree. - humblefool&reg; 00:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Thx for your feedback. The rewrite is better, agreed; your alternative language is better too. Stock phrases seem to have a defect when a plural is used but not meant. Cheers, --IHTS (talk) 03:28, 24 November 2020 (UTC)