User talk:Hunter Kahn/Archive 22

Proposed deletion of File:Parks and recreation ron and tammy.jpg
Hey again. I decided to propose deletion on File:Parks and recreation ron and tammy.jpg, which you uploaded. The image will be deleted if the PROD tag is uncontested for more than seven days. --George Ho (talk) 02:01, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion on a couple more images
Sorry to bother you again. I placed PROD tag on File:Parks and recreation park safety.jpg and File:Parks and recreation summer catalog.jpg for my concerns about their compliance with WP:NFCC. The images will be deleted if tags are left uncontested for more than seven days. --George Ho (talk) 02:18, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

The Brute Man
So the FAC is still going on and the issue of the images have been brought up and one of the reviewers advised to contact you. So J Milburn has some concerns on the licensing with them. So if you are able to address some of these issues that would be helpful. GamerPro64 02:40, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Hey, thanks again for handling that FAC. I went to check out the licensing issues you mentioned and it sounds like the main issue is with this photo because I had been under the mistaken impression that it was public domain, but it turns out it is not. I believe use of the article could be justified with a fair use rationale explaining that the article illustrates Hatton's facial features due to acromegaly, which are a major aspect of the film and the subject of significant discussion in the article. If you agree with this course of action, let me know and I can try to write up the rationale. (I saw there was also an issue raised with the MST3K image. I think a fair use rationale could possibly be argued that the image provides an illustration of how the film is incorporated into the episode (with the silhouettes in the foreground) in a way that makes it clearer than the text does. But that being said, if someone pushes for its removal, I'm fine with dropping it.) — Hunter Kahn 22:02, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Yeah I think there is significance with the picture. But meanwhile I think with the opposition in the FAC about the sourcing issues is going to make it difficult to work on. GamerPro64  21:02, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Would you suggest just removing both photos then, for the sake of the FAC? If so I'm fine with that. Or if you instead want me to take a crack at strengthening the fair use rationale for the non-MST3K photo, let me know. — Hunter Kahn 16:40, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
 * If you think we should cut our loss with the photos I am fine with that. I just am not sure I can fix the sourcing issues that was brought up since I do not have the sources to fix them. GamerPro64  20:16, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I just took a look at the FAC. I saw the sourcing issues identified, and it also looks like JM found a couple other reliable sources that might result in more content and analysis that need to be added to the article. I'd love to address the issues and work on the article in the future, but right now because of personal circumstances I'm not sure I have the time and energy to put into it, unfortunately. Do you think it would be best to just withdraw the FAC for now and maybe revisit it in the future after I'm able to make a concentrated improvement effort? Or do you want to give it a go yourself? If the latter option, I can try to address some of the old sourcing questions... (If you don't want to give up the FAC, I can try to get a bit more involved with it; the timing right now is just a bit difficult...) — Hunter Kahn 21:21, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
 * I would rather withdraw the nomination. My heart isn't fully there at this time anyway. GamerPro64  01:29, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
 * No problem, feel free to do so. Maybe I'll revisit this one some time down the road when I have more wiki-time. I appreciate the effort you made! — Hunter Kahn 02:35, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Wallace the wire.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Wallace the wire.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:10, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

Hello
Greetings! There are two episodes left until the end of season 2 of The Mandalorian. Are you planning to expand your articles about season 1 characters and write about season 2 characters soon? AaronSprouse (talk) 06:53, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

Homicide: Life on the Street (season 2) scheduled for TFA
This is to let you know that the Homicide: Life on the Street (season 2) article has been scheduled as today's featured article for January 6, 2021. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Today's featured article/January 6, 2021, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1000 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so.

For Featured Articles promoted recently, there will be an existing blurb linked from the FAC talk page, which is likely to be transferred to the TFA page by a coordinator at some point.

We suggest that you watchlist Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks! <b style="font-family:Lucida;color:red">Jimfbleak</b> - talk to me?  16:19, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for the article! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:10, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Draft:Bo-Katan_Kryze
I notice you've done a lot of work bringing Star Wars related articles up to a high standard. I would really appreciate if you could take a look at Draft:Bo-Katan_Kryze and maybe comment on the talk page about what you think might be needed to improve enough at least enough for it be acceptable in mainspace instead of as a draft article. Thanks. -- 109.78.195.140 (talk) 04:33, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Good article drive notice
This message has been sent to users signed up for the Good articles newsletter. Add or remove your name from the list to subscribe or unsubscribe from future updates. Alternatively, to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page. -- For the drive co-ordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:27, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Parks and Recreation (season 1) scheduled for TFA
This is to let you know that the Parks and Recreation (season 1) article has been scheduled as today's featured article for April 9, 2021. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Today's featured article/April 9, 2021, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1000 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so.

For Featured Articles promoted recently, there will be an existing blurb linked from the FAC talk page, which is likely to be transferred to the TFA page by a coordinator at some point.

We suggest that you watchlist Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks! <b style="font-family:Lucida;color:red">Jimfbleak</b> - talk to me?

Thank you for the article! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:53, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

GAN Backlog Drive - July 2021
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:31, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of List of fictional locations in the Godzilla films for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of fictional locations in the Godzilla films, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/List of fictional locations in the Godzilla films until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

Precious anniversary
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:54, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Unfriendly fire nathaniel frank.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Unfriendly fire nathaniel frank.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 22:33, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Halyna Hutchins for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Halyna Hutchins is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Halyna Hutchins until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 12:00, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Nolan Watson (baseball)


The article Nolan Watson (baseball) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "non notable minor league baseball player"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spanneraol (talk) 02:53, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

GAN Backlog Drive – January 2022
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject Good articles at 21:18, 31 December 2021 (UTC).

File:Parks and recreation hunting trip.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Parks and recreation hunting trip.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

Also:
 * File:Parks and recreation christmas scandal.jpg
 * File:Parks and recreation time capsule.jpg
 * File:Parks and recreation woman of the year.jpg
 * File:Parks and recreation 94 meetings.jpg
 * File:Parks and recreation ron and tammy part two.jpg
 * File:Parks and recreation flu season.jpg

''' This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. ''' Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

Article feedback before FAC
Hi Hunter, I know you aren't as active as you used to be, but would love to get your advice and feedback. I've been trying to get feedback on an article I've worked on, 1997 New Mexico's 3rd congressional district special election, before I send it to FAC -- the last time I sent a campaign article there, I got walloped pretty bad. I'm trying to do an approach this time where hopefully, I can address issues before they start. I've created a peer review for the New Mexico article, and would love both to get your thoughts and any general advice that would be helpful for me to consider before going through the FAC process again (mostly because you created this phenomenal article here. Thanks in advance either way!  Nomader  ( talk ) 00:01, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

File:Parks and recreation media blitz.JPG listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Parks and recreation media blitz.JPG, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

Also:
 * File:Pilot parks and recreation.jpg
 * File:Go big or go home parks and recreation.jpg

''' This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. ''' Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Parks and Recreation The Pit.ogg


The file File:Parks and Recreation The Pit.ogg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Insufficiently supported by critical commentary, or easily conveyed in free text. Content heard in the sample not contextually significant to the series."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

''' This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. ''' Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

File:Parks and recreation the banquet.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Parks and recreation the banquet.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

''' This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. ''' Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Parks and Recreation Theme.ogg


The file File:Parks and Recreation Theme.ogg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "One version of the theme music heard in the first few seasons of Parks and Recreation lasts thirty seconds. Another version heard in subsequent seasons lasted twenty seconds. Both versions use the same music or recording. This sample lasting 17 seconds may fail WP:NFCC and/or MOS:SAMPLE's ten-percent rule. Furthermore, a sample lasting two or three seconds (in order to comply with the 'rule of thumb' ten-percent rule would not be contextually significant to the series as a whole."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

''' This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. ''' Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

File:Parks and recreation the camel.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Parks and recreation the camel.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. 2600:100A:B108:EBA6:985A:8DDD:7941:29C0 (talk) 18:44, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Paz Vizla Star Wars.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Paz Vizla Star Wars.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:01, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Tommy Johnagin


The article Tommy Johnagin has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Very few claims to fame. Appeared on a couple shows and that's it. No sourcing found"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 23:55, 1 April 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Tommy Johnagin for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tommy Johnagin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Tommy Johnagin until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 15:09, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

Peer review/Ed, Edd n Eddy's Big Picture Show/archive1
I see you have experience in getting animation articles to FA status. Would you mind leaving comments on this PR please? <b style="color:#009900">SNUGGUMS</b> (<b style="color:#009900">talk</b> / <b style="color:#009900">edits</b>) 21:45, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Aarti Party


The article Aarti Party has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Only source is PR, nothing better found"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 23:54, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

RFC on Claire Danes
You previously participated in an RFC about Claire Danes. I have opened an RFC about the same content oof that RFC and would appreciate your input. Talk:Claire Danes SquareInARoundHole (talk) 18:45, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

Always precious
Ten years ago, you were found precious. That's what you are, always. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:46, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of December 15, 2022 Twitter suspensions for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article December 15, 2022 Twitter suspensions is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/December 15, 2022 Twitter suspensions until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. TryKid&thinsp;<sup style="white-space:nowrap;">[dubious – discuss] 20:27, 17 December 2022 (UTC)

LOL u a famous "Woke Wikipedia" editor now!
NY Post: Wikipedia users rush to document 'Thursday Night Massacre' after Twitter suspends reporters

"Woke Wikipedia users rushed to memorialize Twitter's decision to briefly suspend a clutch of liberal reporters who the company says violated their terms of service. In an article entry which labeled the event the 'Thursday Night Massacre (Twitter),' Wikipedia described the decision to briefly suspend the journalists after they shared info related to the flight coordinates of owner Elon Musk's private jet. 'The term Thursday Night Massacre wasn't intended to be editorializing, but rather was the term that was trending on Twitter after the incident and was used by several journalists to describe the event afterwards,' said page author Hunter Kahn, explaining his decision on Wikipedia’s backend 'talk page.' "

Haha, nice one! :) Cheers! 98.155.8.5 (talk) 04:10, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

Replies on move discussion
Re, whether you feel like you have something to say or not, replying to every oppose !vote in a move discussion would be an issue per WP:BLUDGEON. Speaking hypothetically here since replying to 2 !votes is hardly enough to warrant an accusation. VQuakr (talk) 19:11, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks for sharing that essay. I'm not actively trying to respond to everyone who disagrees with me, but rather with specific instances where I disagree with an interpretation of policy or guidelines. But you are correct that I have responded to several oppose votes at this point, so your point is well taken. — <b style="color:#C0C0C0">Hunter</b> <b style="color:#595454">Kahn</b> 19:18, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

"Headlines—including subheadlines—are not a reliable source"
Greetings! Your reference to the Mediaite headline referring to the "Thursday Night Massacre" is not permissible. Please see WP:HEADLINES (i.e., headlines are not reliable sources). The only reliable source for this that remains is the Reuters article, which attributes the phrase to "one security researcher" who "labeled" it as such. Please review the WP guidelines and policies regarding sourcing and attribution. If you have any questions on this particular edit, let's discuss on the article's talk page. Thanks! Kalem014 (talk) 18:17, 19 December 2022 (UTC)


 * There are multiple other reliable sources that make mention of the "Thursday Night Massacre".  Cheers! 98.155.8.5 (talk) 11:06, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Celia Ammerman for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Celia Ammerman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Celia Ammerman& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 04:55, 23 January 2023 (UTC)

Feb 15: WikiWednesday Salon in Brooklyn
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

--Wikimedia New York City Team via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:52, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

Mar 8: WikiWednesday Salon by Grand Central
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

--Wikimedia New York City Team via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:39, 28 February 2023 (UTC)

Apr 12 WikiWednesday + Earth Week (Apr 15-23)
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

--Wikimedia New York City Team via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:06, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Sat: Earth Day Edit-a-thon + Sun: Wiki-Picnic
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

--Wikimedia New York City Team via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:37, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

May 17: WikiWednesday Salon + Queering Wikipedia
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

--Wikimedia New York City Team via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:40, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

June 21: WikiWednesday Salon back in Manhattan!
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

--Wikimedia New York City Team via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:05, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

July 19 WikiWednesday + New York Botanical Garden Edit-a-thon (July 29)
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

--Wikimedia New York City Team via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:23, 12 July 2023 (UTC)

WikiWednesday (Aug 23) and Governors Island Wiki-Picnic (Sun Aug 27)
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

--Wikimedia New York City Team via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

Sunday: NYC Wiki-Picnic @ Gov Island
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

--Wikimedia New York City Team via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:27, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Pal (dog)
Pal (dog) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Wizardman 22:44, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

Sep 20: Wikimedia NYC Annual Election Meeting
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

--Wikimedia New York City Team via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:03, 10 September 2023 (UTC)