User talk:IAmTheSmartMan

November 2020
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Aaron Nesmith, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 17:39, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Mac McClung. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Dmoore5556 (talk) 19:17, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Vimael Machín, you may be blocked from editing. Dmoore5556 (talk) 19:21, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Response
What the heck! I interviewed a scout for that! put it back!

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Danilo Gallinari. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  Asartea  Talk  undefined  Contribs  15:03, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

IAmTheSmartMan, you are invited to the Teahouse!
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Damian Jones (basketball). Materialscientist (talk) 13:45, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 13:49, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

March 2021
Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Shendrik Apostel. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. ''Also, do not forget about adding reliable citations to avoid your articles being deleted. :)'' - 𓋹 𝓩𝓲𝓪𝓭 𝓡𝓪𝓼𝓱𝓪𝓭 𓋹 [user |  talk] 15:31, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Shendrik Apostel


The article Shendrik Apostel has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. - 𓋹 𝓩𝓲𝓪𝓭 𝓡𝓪𝓼𝓱𝓪𝓭 𓋹 [user |  talk] 15:33, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Shendrik Apostel moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Shendrik Apostel, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... disco spinster   talk  21:04, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Shendrik Apostel
Hello, IAmTheSmartMan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Shendrik Apostel, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:01, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Shendrik Apostel


Hello, IAmTheSmartMan. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Shendrik Apostel".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:28, 8 September 2021 (UTC)