User talk:Ibn.masud

In response to your feedback
Neutrality is not subject to someones perception (definitional fact). Neural is to be impartial and not have a side. Neutrality is not a tool used to ignore fact it is a tool used to keep opinion from mixing with fact. Wikipedia and all Encyclopedia's are fact based; opinions destroy these kinds of projects. Neutrality is what protects Wikipedia from being a place for $%*! slinging and propaganda.

RubberBallMorality (talk) 01:27, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

&#160;


 * What looks good on paper doesn't always work in practice, when the rules leave space for choice neutrality is often used to negate a valid fact in order to bolster a minority opinion. I have personally experienced this in pages such as the criticisms of Muhammad page. i understand the difference between fact, opinion and propaganda, far to long the neutrality was used to uphold the right to openly defame the prophet on that page when the same subjects could have been dealt with in a scholarly manner, instead vulgar and foul language was permitted rather than deal with specific topics. We know how that turned out recently with the innocents of Muslims video. Iβn Mᾱsῡɖ τᾱℓк 02:04, 1 November 2012 (UTC)


 * A good example of neutrality guidelines being used/manipulated into pushing forward a point of view...."Meet The Climate Change Denier Who Became The Voice Of Hurricane Sandy On Wikipedia" Iβn Mᾱsῡɖ τᾱℓк 13:01, 4 November 2012 (UTC)


 * I thought this was also relevant to the discussion, This article appeared in Nexus Magazine, Volume 14, Number 5 (October - November 2007); Truths and Lies of WikiWorld'''  Iβn Mᾱsῡɖ τᾱℓк</b></i> 00:59, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

Please gives neutral sources instead of giving your own opinions and Islamic propaganda. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.135.22.175 (talk) 21:06, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or  located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 12:06, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

A belated welcome!
Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Ibn.masud. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia: Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes ( ~ ); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on, consult Questions, or place helpme on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Singularity42 (talk) 04:06, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

Signature
Ibn.masud, what's going on with your signature? Are you typing in  for your signature, or are you manually typing and/or copy-pasting in your signature? If you are doing the latter, that would explain why SineBot keeps noting your comments as unsigned, and has left an automated message on your talk page.

You should really be typing in  for your signature. If you want to keep your special formatting, follow the directions WP:CUSTOMSIG so that you can make the necessary changes at Special:Preferences. Singularity42 (talk) 04:10, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

Hi im typing in the tildes manually, I have no clue why its doing that, ive tried changing web browsers but no luck?...here goes another try...><i style="text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;"><b style="color:#1000"> Iβn Mᾱsῡd </b><b style="color:#902">τᾱℓк</b></i> 05:41, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

I think I figured it out, just trying something<i style="text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;"><b style="color:#1000"> Iβn Mᾱsῡd </b><b style="color:#902">τᾱℓк</b></i> 06:17, 28 November 2012 (UTC)


 * There is something weird about your sig that's confusing the bot, but I can't figure out what it is either. If it persists, you could add " Category:Wikipedians who have opted out of automatic signing" to your User page to make it stop flagging you. Tarc (talk) 14:58, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
 * thanks for the advice but I know what the issue was, I was missing a dot in the signature, I semi corrected it but the talk link is no longer working ill have to look into that another day as I don't have time now.<i style="text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;"><b style="color:#1000"> Iβn Mᾱsῡd </b><b style="color:#902">τᾱℓк</b></i> 10:17, 29 November 2012 (UTC)