User talk:ImTheAvidPheasant

Welcome!
Peaceray (talk) 05:58, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of KreekCraft


The article KreekCraft has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "This streamer is not notable. I could not find significant coverage in reliable sources. The sources cited in the article are mostly his own videos, as well as sites like this."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. voorts (talk/contributions) 21:59, 29 May 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of KreekCraft for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article KreekCraft is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/KreekCraft until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. voorts (talk/contributions) 00:20, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

June 2024
Hi ImTheAvidPheasant! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Baner several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree&#32;at, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Rusty4321 talk contribs 15:42, 15 June 2024 (UTC)


 * I only reverted it once. Im sorry if I made a mistake. ImTheAvidPheasant (talk) 15:44, 15 June 2024 (UTC)