User talk:Imeriki al-Shimoni/Archive 1

Yahweh
I've made the split on Yahweh. I'm also suggesting a new stage of editing. You might like to comment on the article talk page. PiCo (talk) 04:44, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
 * You've convinced me - I've changed it back :) PiCo (talk) 11:01, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Sorry, reverted to the wrong edit.PiCo (talk) 12:04, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

CV Disambig
I think I fixed the redirect that was left after the page move. Let me know if I missed something else. As to the meaning of CV, working on wiki teaches you a lot. 06:24, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

Niels Peter Lemche
Thanks for your note, and sorry for being so slow getting back to you. I wasn't aware that he and Jim West had problems with it, and I'm sorry to hear that they do. Yes, I'd love to see their emails. PiCo (talk) 10:48, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Across the Hall (2009 Film)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Across the Hall (2009 Film), and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.palaceofhorror.com/2009/01/10/across-the-hall. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 06:07, 25 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Done. The plot information that I used for the new 2009 film article just created was mainly based on the Wikipedia article for the short-film the 2009 film was a direct remake of. Rewrote the plot information (luckily I had just finished watching it). Apparently the short film's page was based on the above cited ext webpage, which means it probably needs to be rewritten, as well. — al-Shimoni  ( talk ) 06:36, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

History of Ancient Israel and Judah
I'm away for 2 months. You might like to keep an eye on this and. if the spirit moves, edit a bit. Muyintention has been to avoid a simple rehash of the biblical story - that's already on several pother articles. I want to present a summary history based on the archaeological evidence. That means skipping the United Kingdom period in the narrative history section. Then come back with another section on Problems in Current Historiography, which would address the question of non-biblical evidence for the United Monarchy and a few other areas. That section will also address the questions Lemche and others have raised, about the era and circumstances in which the main biblical text was composed - Exilic, Postexilic, Hasmonean. Have a go if you feel inclined, but be prepared to see it all reverted by the bible-is-true brigade. (While I'm away I'll be researching Cambodian ghosts. Much more interesting, really.) PiCo (talk) 08:38, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

IP with agenda
You could try talk - I've always found him helpful, tho he's also busy.PiCo (talk) 04:57, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

Nehemia Gordon
You seem to have the situation under control. What I would like to see is an inline citation for Nehemia Gordon where he states he is a Karaite Jew (we really need references and for religion we like self-identification). He's also controversial and that should probably be in the article on him. Also I have to point out that "arguably the best known" needs sourcing (as does 'prominent' used for another person in the same list, etc). Otherwise it looks like editorial comment -- you need to be able to say 'described as.....' or something like that. Dougweller (talk) 12:30, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

Improving the subsection "Karaite inscription in Khazarian Rovas script (10th century)"
Hi! I improved the subsection, please, read it: Karaite inscription in Khazarian Rovas script (10th century) in the Karaite Judaism. I think this inscription is very important, since it is a direct evidence about the religion of - at least - one Khazar person. In the Hungarian paleography this fact was published even in the 1990's; however, only in Hungarian. That is why is could be interesting in the readers in English. --Rovasscript (talk) 06:58, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

User: Driftchambers
for my benefit, please state the instances/examples that caused this comment to need to be madeDrift chambers (talk) 09:54, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
 * It's really quite simple, Drift chambers, limit your use of "minor edit" to 100% non-controversial edits. If someone is writing about the first president of the U.S. and types "Wasington", then mark your correction as "minor" as long as you actually correct the typo.  If one editor in 1000 might possibly disagree with your edit, do not mark it as minor. It's that simple.  Cullen 328   Let's discuss it  06:26, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

Asperger Syndrome personal attacks by IP
Would you vid. here and perhaps comment? I like your earlier comment, but this IP editor is attacking us all in one fell swoop. IP must be stopped.-- Djathinkimacowboy BUCKSHOT 13:01, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

File:God - Sistine Chapel Michelangelo.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:God - Sistine Chapel Michelangelo.png, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда . 15:15, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

IP block exempt
I have granted your account an exemption from IP blocking. This will allow you to edit through full blocks affecting your IP address when you are logged in.

Please read the page IP block exemption carefully, especially the section on IP block exemption conditions.

Note in particular that you are not permitted to use this newly-granted right to edit Wikipedia via anonymous proxies, or disruptively. If you do, or there is a serious concern of abuse, then the right may be removed by any administrator.

Appropriate usage and compliance with the policy may be checked periodically, due to the nature of block exemption, and block exemption will be removed when no longer needed (for example, when the block it is related to expires).

I hope this will enhance your editing, and allow you to edit successfully and without disruption. Ron h jones (Talk) 00:31, 16 February 2012 (UTC)