User talk:Impru20/Archive 2

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Andalusian parliamentary election, 1996 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Javier Arenas


 * Andalusian parliamentary election, 2008 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Manuel Chaves


 * Andalusian parliamentary election, 2012 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Javier Arenas

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:31, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Andalusian parliamentary election, 1990 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to Córdoba and Jaén


 * Andalusian parliamentary election, 2008 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to Córdoba and Jaén


 * Basque parliamentary election, 2013 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to Vizcaya and Aralar


 * Andalusian parliamentary election, 1982 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Córdoba


 * Andalusian parliamentary election, 1986 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Córdoba


 * Andalusian parliamentary election, 1994 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Córdoba


 * Andalusian parliamentary election, 1996 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Córdoba


 * Andalusian parliamentary election, 2000 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Jaén


 * Andalusian parliamentary election, 2004 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Jaén


 * Andalusian parliamentary election, 2012 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Córdoba


 * Basque parliamentary election, 2001 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Vizcaya


 * Basque parliamentary election, 2005 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Vizcaya


 * Basque parliamentary election, 2009 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Vizcaya

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Election articles
Well done for creating all those Spanish election articles, but when you add the stub tags they have to go at the bottom of the page rather than the top! Number  5  7  16:46, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Also, when you're adding the infoboxes to articles, make sure you use the same date format as the article (which outside of American-related articles, should be "day month year", not "month day, year". Cheers Number   5  7  17:07, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Election results
I have to say I was shocked to see you make this revert. The results you reinstated into the infobox are different to those I provided from an official source - the Congress website (taken from the Junta Election Central, or the book I referenced it to (the version you reverted to has no source, although I suspect you are using the same one you mentioned in the 1979 article revert). You also removed all the information about the Senate electiosn which was newly added. I am open to combining PSOE and PSC in the infobox, but just reverting everything? The same goes for your revert of the other election article - fair enough you can disagree about the actual results, but please don't just revert to a far less detailed version. The link you used as the edit summary for the 1979 election includes far more detaield results than even I had added, but you reverted to a crap version with far less detail. Why didn't you just fill in the different votes your source uses?

Basically what I'm trying to say is that I'm open to amending the results if you want to discuss which is the more reliable source (I will use the results on this site to fill the results tables if that's what is the definitive source, but why would the Congress have different figures?), but please don't simply revert to less detailed versions that don't even include vote numbers or the Senate. Thanks, Number   5  7  08:42, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
 * PS - apologies if the above comes across as a bit hostile - I wrote it shortly after I woke up. Like I said, I'm happy to use the mir.es source to amend the articles if you think this is the most reliable and will do so later today after a response. I just think that reverting to less detailed versions (and removing the Senate info) was a bit harsh. Number   5  7  11:16, 2 March 2012 (UTC)


 * OK, next time I work on the articles (possibly this evening) I will use the mir.es source (and I'll correct the tables in the 1979 and 1982 elections). Regarding the Senate results, at some point I will put in some text on the electoral system that explains that only some of the seats were elected, and those marked "Regional" were actually appointed by the regional parliaments.
 * Also, I think the election results tables used on articles like Spanish general election, 1996 needs some work - particularly in its length - you cannot see the whole table on a single screen because every row has one or more lines. If you have a less complex table like on Spanish general election, 1982, it makes it much easier to read. Number   5  7  15:47, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Election results and opinion polls in Spain (2004-2008).png
Thanks for uploading File:Election results and opinion polls in Spain (2004-2008).png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:05, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Election results and opinion polls in Spain (2008-2011).png
Thanks for uploading File:Election results and opinion polls in Spain (2008-2011).png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:05, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Opinion polling for the Basque parliamentary election, 2012, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Basque Country (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:53, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Opinion polling for the Basque parliamentary election, 2012


The article Opinion polling for the Basque parliamentary election, 2012 has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Outdated opinion polls for a past regional-level election do not have the historical value to justify a separate Wikipedia article. There are some opinion polls incorporated in the main article Basque parliamentary election, 2012. That is enough.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RJFF (talk) 20:40, 22 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your comprehension and for agreeing with me. I respect your diligent work collecting all this polling data. But Wikipedia, being (or at least claiming to be) an encyclopedia, has to keep a historical perspective. In the future, no one will be interested in the opinion polls of a past election, as the election is over, and the actual election result is available. Again: thank you for your contributions. I think that you are a really committed, constructive and co-operative editor. Keep up the good work! Kind regards. --RJFF (talk) 15:50, 24 October 2012 (UTC)