User talk:InfiniteNexus/Archive 27

Concern regarding Draft:Pixel Fold 2
Hello, InfiniteNexus. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Pixel Fold 2, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:06, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Pixelbook (2nd generation)


Hello, InfiniteNexus. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Pixelbook".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 17:46, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Avengers: Quantum Encounter


Hello, InfiniteNexus. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Avengers: Quantum Encounter".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 17:52, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
 * This one can go. InfiniteNexus (talk) 17:54, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

Data update - most visited websites
Hi, I already fixed all the issues that was in the past, can you please explain which errors you are referring to? thanks GrowTHC (talk) 10:32, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Regarding the flags, please see Grayfell comment at 21:47, 9 January 2024‎ in the talk page, he mentioned to remove the flags. GrowTHC (talk) 10:45, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
 * It took me quite a while to clean up the table; if you have specific concerns, you are more than welcome to discuss, but you shouldn't revert all of my changes just because you don't like it. The previous table had several issues, including the confusing and unencyclopedic "category" column that was copy-and-pasted from Similarweb and possibly violates WP:NOTGUIDE, the inappropriately adjusted font size, multiple incorrect links, etc. I also cleaned up the fat table header, added a sticker header, added a column, used the correct templates for "N/A" and increase/decrease, corrected capitalization errors, cleaned up the formatting, etc. Do you have any specific concerns with any of these changes? As for the flags, they shouldn't violate MOS:FLAGS as they are being used to identify the country of origin, but that's debatable and I'm amenable — if more users object, we can disuss on the talk page. InfiniteNexus (talk) 18:05, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

Reverting reliable sources
Hey,

please verify sources before you revert the work of others. Source 22 of the Google Tensor article cites the same refs I've used to make my edits and they have been approved by the article's unofficial watchdog. Your argument is also invalid because all codenames for example are the result of "leaks" but I'd rather call that code investigation. These codenames can be found in the factory images of the corresponding Pixel devices and can be verified but not really referenced for Wikipedia. If you find a better source to reference this information please feel free to add it but simply deleting everything that doesn't fit your liking isn't how Wikipedia operates as it's a community effort. RM12 (talk) 12:06, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
 * You are not assuming good faith. If you find a source in the article that references a leak by an unreliable source, it should not be there and should be removed. You can remove it yourself or bring it up on the talk page. Galaxy Club is a self-described blog and is therefore not reliable. The second source you added references Reddit, which is obviously unreliable. Two wrongs don't make a right, and no editor is perfect. InfiniteNexus (talk) 04:14, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Yes it's pretty hard for me to assume good faith in this case because all the code names are results of leaks. The source for Cloudripper cites Twitter and that's not any better than Reddit. The people who leaked this information found those in the code of android though giving it a high probability of being correct.
 * I would personally argue to lower the bar for reliability because a leak isn't inherently unreliable. It has to be proven that it's false. All articles used as sources are subjectively judging the reliability of the information they obtain just like you and I am so they aren't inherently more reliable. Though Galaxy Club describes themselves as blog doesn't mean they are unreliable either.
 * But I'm actually fine with the corrections you made. Sorry for the harsh phrasing. RM12 (talk) 11:30, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Then let's just remove all of the codenames. Now that I think about it, they seem trivial anyway and not really of encyclopedic significance. InfiniteNexus (talk) 16:01, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Avengers: Code Red has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Avengers: Code Red. Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 15:12, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
 * I didn't submit this draft. InfiniteNexus (talk) 04:07, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

Dune 2 disambiguation
Hi. You've removed from the Dune 2 film page a direct disambiguation link to the video game, leaving only the general disambiguation page.

I think the game deserves a direct link: * It's practically the same name – most people likely call the movie "Dune 2" and not "part 2". * The game is notable, being the forefather of modern RTS games (<-- mentioned in the 2nd intro sentence). * Not much downside to including it in the disambiguation line. galenIgh 16:41, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
 * The video game is not titled Dune: Part Two, so there is no risk of confusion with the film. Dune 2 is a disambiguation page. InfiniteNexus (talk) 04:31, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
 * I call them both "Dune 2" and I can't be the only one. The Dune II game article included an Template:about link to the movie. No harm in having the reverse. It's a useful shortcut, and the usage is consistent with many other articles. galenIgh  00:47, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Yes, which is why both the film and the video game are listed on the Dune 2 disambiguation page. But again, the crux of the matter is that the video game's title does contain the word "part", so there is no risk of confusion. In other words, readers are unlikely to be looking for the video game (titled Dune II) if they went through the trouble of adding the word "part" to their search query and spelling out the Roman numeral. On the other hand, since Dune: Part Two is often referred to as Dune 2 in common parlance, so a hatnote pointing to the film is reasonable. InfiniteNexus (talk) 04:27, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
 * It's both convenient and harmless to have that hatnote in the film's page. But I'm not going to dwell on this if you're so strongly opposed. galenIgh  14:58, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

New message from ExclusiveEditor
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals) § AI for WP guidelines/ policies. Exclusive Editor Notify Me! 07:40, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:MCU: The Reign of Marvel Studios
Hello, InfiniteNexus. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:MCU: The Reign of Marvel Studios, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:06, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

March music
Thank you for your support for a MoS change, saying: "Infoboxes are generally beneficial and should be included if there is enough information." - Bach music for Easter! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:31, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

Mae
Originally, I did find a video that showed the character using Nova/Mae. However, now there is another video by the film's creator that explicitly has the character state her name is Mae, at the 50 second mark, and I am merely updating the page. I uploaded the video as a reference, I specifically stated the second she said her name is Mae at the 50 second mark, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bKFioDLCyRA, and I stated that the new information confirms it. At this point, it is not me that is creating disruptive editing for adding inaccurate information, but you for refusing to accept that you were wrong and are continuing to insert outdated information. I will put it back the way it was that explicitly states her name is Mae, because that is the most accurate information, and if you cannot accept that, that is on you, but since this video is uploaded by the film's creator, it is all too likely will accept this, so please accept that her name is now confirmed to be Mae and just leave it. 2607:FEA8:7221:F600:A4BE:B154:27E9:39FD (talk) 17:00, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
 * We have the actual scene from the film in which the ape characters name her "Nova". The other video (which has apparently been taken down for unknown reasons, but not before I watched it earlier), has the same characters saying her name is "Mae". Based on this, and the fact that a third video labels her character as "Nova / Mae", indicates (presumably) that the character is given the name "Nova" by the apes until her real name, "Mae", is revealed. When a character has two alternative names, we list both on Wikipedia.
 * You are continuing to edit-war. Your edit has already been reverted by users over the past few months. This behavior is disruptive; please stop and discuss on the talk page if you disagree. You do not WP:OWN the article and cannot act against the clear consensus of the community. If you revert again, you will be blocked for edit-warring. Please do not do so. Thank you.
 * InfiniteNexus (talk) 18:09, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

Edit warring

You have consistently edit warred on the Kingdom of the Planet of the Apes and have been adamant on restoring false and outdated information and disregarding when clear sources have been given to you. If you do not cease with this readding of false information, I will be forced to get the admins involved. Please drop the false information. 2607:FEA8:7221:F600:A4BE:B154:27E9:39FD (talk) 18:24, 8 April 2024 (UTC)