User talk:Irishfrisian

January 2012
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. 76.248.147.199 (talk) 00:40, 10 January 2012 (UTC)


 * In addition to deleting sourced content, you appear to be editing much as this IP did prior to receiving a final warning. 76.248.147.199 (talk) 00:40, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

In response to your feedback
You need administrative privileges to block someone. If you want someone blocked, contact an admin.

Abigail was here :D  Talk to Me.   Email Me.  02:54, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

&#160;

In response to your feedback
see WP:AN

Ariconte (talk) (Email me)  02:54, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

&#160;

In response to your feedback
See the notices already on your talk-page.

Lectonar (talk) 09:48, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

&#160;

In response to your feedback
Hi Irishfrisian, and thank you for your feedback. Talk pages are important for gaining consensus on what should be in articles, so if you feel a section should not be included, you should set out your reasons on the talkpage rather than simply blanking the content. Your argument can then be discussed and considered by others.

Edits to talkpages can be made in the same way as edits to articles; just use the "Edit" tab at the top of the page.

Yunshui 雲&zwj;水 15:13, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

&#160;

May 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, Clash of warriors, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will be removed shortly (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests, and consider using the Article Wizard. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 23:31, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Clash of warriors


A tag has been placed on Clash of warriors requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Ducknish (talk) 23:33, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Clash of warriors. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Please remember to log in when you edit Wikipedia, otherwise you  and your IP address may be permanently  blocked from  further editing -  particularly  if the edits and/or created articles are inappropriate. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 00:18, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for your recent contributions, such as Clash of warriors. Getting started creating new articles on Wikipedia can be tricky, and you might like to try creating a draft version first, which you can then ask for feedback on if necessary, with less risk of speedy deletion. Do make sure you also read help available to you, including Your First Article and the Tutorial. You might also like to try the Article Wizard, which has an option to create a draft version. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 00:40, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as you did at Clash of warriors, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 00:59, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Clash of warriors


A tag has been placed on Clash of warriors requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. –  sumone10154  ( talk • contribs ) 01:00, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or  located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 01:04, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you create an inappropriate page, as you did at Clash of warriors, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Eeekster (talk) 01:06, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Article creation
This is just to  let you  know that  you  will  no  longer be able to  create  the page Clash of warriors in  mainspace without  the approval  of an administrator. If you  wish  to  write the article, please create it  in  your Sandbox first, then ask for it  to  be reviewed by  me or another  admin. If appropriate, you  may  also  wish  to  read WP:Guidance for younger editors and find out exactly what vandalism  is. Thanks. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 01:23, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

WP:ADMINACCT

Please also read WP:Boomerang. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 01:34, 6 May 2012 (UTC) - and please refrain from leaving  inappropriate comments on  other users'  talk  pages. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 01:46, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

I do  suggest  most  strongly  that  if you  wish  to  retain  your editing  privileges you  now read some of the advice pages you have been linked to, and refrain  from  making  disruptive comments  on  other users' talk  pages. There is plenty of help  avaiklable here, but  you  might  wish  to  consider going  about  getting  it  the right  way. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 02:21, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Once again an example of your administrative abuse wich is why i'v requested you be blocked permmanentlyIrishfrisian (talk) 02:36, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

In response to your feedback
If you wish are having a dispute about a user's action then you should first take it up with the user. Only once this is done could you report in to the Administrators' noticeboard. I hope this helps.

Jamietw (talk) 10:26, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

&#160; I did and he threatened to block meIrishfrisian (talk) 23:22, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Warrior (disambiguation)
Stop adding the redlink Clash of warriors to the disambiguation page. First, there is no article with that title and second, the title is not ambiguous. older ≠ wiser 00:32, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Stonewall riots. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stonewall_riots&action=history page history]. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 22:55, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

In response to your feedback
I've reviewed the content on your talk page and suggest that you just calm down, read over your own talk page and Kudpung's and see who abused who. Apparently, you threatened to report Kudpung first. Please calm down first.

A Wild Abigail Appears!  Capture me.   Moves.  20:07, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

&#160;

Your assertion is incorrect he attacked me first and unfairly threatened to block me without cause clearly you just looked fore the information you wanted to see and disregarded the truthIrishfrisian (talk) 14:12, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

May 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Stonewall riots. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stonewall_riots&action=history page history]. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. You do know about edit summaries, I suppose? Rivertorch (talk) 18:49, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

June 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Dan Savage are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. Dennis Bratland (talk) 19:59, 5 June

Crotalus adamanteus
That is called a page move. See Moving_articles Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 03:43, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

Native American Mascot controversy
Your comments on the talk page were in a section that was old and difficult to locate, so I will respond here. You may have a point about Vikings, but I doubt that there is any discrimination against Scandinavians based upon their warrior ancestors. The point of the article is that Native Americans do endure that discrimination, and are often not thought of as modern participants in society while retaining their heritage, unlike other ethnic groups. Ethnic stereotyping of Indians is an expression of the low regard or outright hostility toward them, so I do not think eliminating mascots will increase that hostility.FigureArtist (talk) 17:52, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

Jax
I don't know exactly what the problem is you have with Jax, but perhaps you will find this interesting: Requests for comment/Jax 0677. The Banner talk 11:48, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * List of Deadliest Warrior episodes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to Blinding, Ball and Chain, Lakota and Lancea

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 01:39, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

Largest organisms
I do not understand why you say that there was no concensus. Concensus was reached here []. Further more, I do not appreciate being called a moron or a vandal. Such terms in the circumstances are regarded as wp:uncivil Op47 (talk) 17:06, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

Editing while logged out
Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of more than one account or IP address by one person. If this was not your intention, then please always remember to log in when editing. Thank you. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 03:19, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Largest organisms
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

December 2012
Please do not attack other editors, as you did on Talk:Largest organisms. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. --Guy Macon (talk) 10:43, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

Stop Reverting
Please stop reverting back to your favorite version of Largest Organism, and please, instead propose ways to fix and or rewrite the article.--Mr Fink (talk) 02:53, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Furthermore, you are in danger of violating WP:3RR with your insistence on reverting in order to protect your favorite version of the page.--Mr Fink (talk) 03:00, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Complaint about your edits at WP:AN3
Please see WP:AN3. You may respond there if you wish. EdJohnston (talk) 03:21, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Reverts
Irishrisian, please do not revert again until you have a consensus at that article. It's very clear that your edits are contested. I want to be clear; since this account now appears to be dedicated to edit warring at that article, you will be blocked if you revert again. Kuru  (talk)  01:40, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

Review of closing.
If you have a problem with the way I closed the split discussion on Largest organisms then you should not edit war, but rather you should ask for a review. Challenging a closing gives the details on how to do this. That article does recomend that you try discussing with the closer i.e. me. I consider [] to be you discussing the matter with me. In case you have not worked it out, that has not convinced me that my closing of the discussion was in any way wrong. If you still have a problem then the link I have given would appear to be your remedy rather than edit warring. Op47 (talk) 17:04, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

List of medieval great powers

 * 1) The page has been around since 2006. There's been plenty of time to add citations.
 * 2) Contrary to your assertion that I don't try to help, I added every useful citation on the page.
 * 3) My interpretation of SYNTH is perfectly correct. The term "great power" has very specific meaning.
 * 4) You can add sources before restoring the text, but you don't seem to have anything useful to add. Srnec (talk) 19:00, 22 April 2020 (UTC)


 * incorrect you deleted several useful citations also your interpretation of wp synth completely ignores What SYNTH is not and also the term great power is a rather vague term synonymous with great nation and great empire the lede of an article has the ability to define what qualifies for a list you have been completely inflexible with everyone Irishfrisian (talk) 07:11, 1 May 2020 (UTC)