User talk:JJpeterson

Ask me any questions here and I will do my best to help you out.

Kenneth Ward
Hey, JJpeterson! You created the article Kenneth Ward just now, and you've probably noticed that I added a tag to the reference specifying that the material was copied from a public domain source- namely, his official US gov profile. Wikipedia has pretty strict rules on both copyright and plagiarism, and it's really important that we all read and follow them.

But now that that's all dealt with, allow me to give you a very belated welcome to Wikipedia! Glad you've decided to stick around and get more active in the project. If you have any more questions, feel free to ask at the teahouse or at my talk page. Happy editing! GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 06:20, 7 July 2024 (UTC)


 * Hi GreenLipstickLesbian, thank you so much for your warm welcome and information. This is duely noted. I'm looking forward to more editings! JJpeterson (talk) 17:47, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Forgot to @GreenLipstickLesbian you. Here it is. Thanks again! JJpeterson (talk) 03:07, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

Kenneth Ward moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to Kenneth Ward. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and those sources should be reliable and independent of the subject. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 02:14, 8 July 2024 (UTC)


 * Hi Significa liberdade, thank you for your message! I wanted to let you know that Kenneth Ward, along with Brent Hartley and Dead Pittman, were found in the list of US Ambassadors lacking a wikipedia page (I cannot recall the exact name but there is one, in the executive branch of US government officials), so I thought these names were notable enough for their pages. @Significa liberdade JJpeterson (talk) 03:06, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Hi! These individuals are likely notable! However, you'll still want to include additional sources to ensure they meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines for people. Additionally, it would be beneficial to paraphrase the information on the page, even though it's not technically a copyright violation. =) Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 03:10, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

Brent Hartley moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to Brent Hartley. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and those sources should be reliable and independent of the subject. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 02:14, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

H. Dean Pittman moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to H. Dean Pittman. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and those sources should be reliable and independent of the subject. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 02:15, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jennifer M. Adams


A tag has been placed on Jennifer M. Adams requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Articles for deletion/Jennifer M. Adams (2nd nomination). When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CycloneYoris talk! 04:36, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: H. Dean Pittman (July 8)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vanderwaalforces was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:H. Dean Pittman and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:H._Dean_Pittman Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Vanderwaalforces&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:H._Dean_Pittman reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 22:12, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brent Hartley (July 9)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Paul W were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Brent Hartley and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Brent_Hartley Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Paul_W&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Brent_Hartley reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Paul W (talk) 16:42, 9 July 2024 (UTC)

July 2024
Hi JJpeterson! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor&#32;at List of largest empires that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. TompaDompa (talk) 11:17, 10 July 2024 (UTC)