User talk:JRennocks

Your GA nomination of Westminster Abbey
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Westminster Abbey you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Tim riley -- Tim riley (talk) 11:21, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Westminster Abbey
The article Westminster Abbey you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Westminster Abbey for comments about the article, and Talk:Westminster Abbey/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Tim riley -- Tim riley (talk) 17:03, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Westminster Abbey
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 6 May 2023 (UTC) GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:27, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

Taking the Abbey to FAC?
One doesn't wish to nag but at GAN I touched on the possibility of your taking the article to FAC. I think it worth doing and suggest putting it up for peer review first. Perfectly understand if you are not thus inclined, of course, but pray ponder.  Tim riley  talk   12:27, 19 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the reminder! My life exploded rather around the time of the GAN, so I don't think I'll be able to do this at the mo. Although I'd like to come back to it one day, I don't know if or when that would be. If someone else would like to have a go in the meantime, they'd have my blessing. JRennocks (talk) 18:52, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Hello! I'm back! Work has quietened down a bit now, so I'd like to try and finish this off. I've given Westminster Abbey a bit of a tidy up since I left it in the winter, and I'm going to put it up for peer review now. JRennocks (talk) 14:36, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Westminster Abbey copyedit

 * That's brilliant, thank you! JRennocks (talk) 10:18, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

Spoken article request
Hello JRennocks, I have requested a possible spoken article for you to try, if you are interested.

Here is the talk page for the article: |Talk:Conker's Bad Fur Day.

If you are interested, let me know by replying. Clay2004 (talk) 13:42, 29 March 2024 (UTC)