User talk:Jahnx

Welcome to WikiProject Aquarium Fishes
Hi Jahnx, welcome to WikiProject Aquarium Fishes. Our project page has various policies and guidelines that can help you edit fishkeeping articles. And here's the project April newsletter to help you keep up with current activities. The May issue will also come out soon. Enjoy! --Melanochromis 04:31, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

--Melanochromis 04:31, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

The Aquarium Fishes Newsletter: May 2007
--Melanochromis 20:06, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Louisville brainstorming about enhancing communication and coordination
See this project talk topic. Your views are very much welcome! Stevie is the man! Talk &bull; Work 16:56, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Baird's History
If you really want to do more mayors of Jeff, get a copy of Baird's History of Clark County, Indiana. There are three copies available for checkout at the Jeff library, one of which I have.--Bedford (talk) 01:26, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

TableManners
There's an user named TableManners that is deleteing the Museums in Louisville category from any that are in Indiana. I am going to need assistance with this newbie that has already made self-righteous comments on my talk page about it.--Bedford (talk) 06:50, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Rfc on Museums_in_Louisville problem
I made an Rfc stating the problem and proposing one solution. Please take a look and submit comments or propose other solutions. Should Museums in Indiana be listed in Museums in Kentucky?. Thanks. T able M anners U·T·C 07:36, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Template:Museums_in_Kentucky classifications too course
Please take a look at Template_talk:Museums_in_Kentucky. I am seeking input on the organization of this template. The classifications are a bit too course in my view. T able M anners U·T·C 17:38, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

A.J. Foyt IV
I feel that I have addressed your concerns about A. J. Foyt IV regarding good article criteria. -Drdisque (talk) 05:15, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on John Minta requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Truthanado (talk) 22:16, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

List of Jeff mayors
I have a picture of a list of every mayor of Jeffersonville, including their time as mayor and their profession. I found it in Encyclopedia of Louisville. Let me know if you are interested in seeing this.-- Bedford 00:58, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I am very interested in seeing this. My email is kingjahnx@gmail.com if you don't mind sending it to me. - Jahnx ( talk ) 01:30, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

It has been sent. I included all three pages of the Jeffersonville entry; I apologize for the size. The book has some of its pages available in Google Books for free, but not nearly enough. It's available at the main Jeff Township library.-- Bedford 01:42, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Louisville "This Day"
I've started creating a "This Day in Louisville History" at Portal:Louisville/thisday. I don't want to put it up until its fairly full, as I don't want to endanger the portal's probably featured status. But I thought you might like to know its existance, in case there is anything you might want to add.-- Bedford 13:31, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Richard Vissing
Another editor has added the " " template to the article Richard Vissing, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the  template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 09:15, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Portal:Kentucky
Check Featured portal candidates to endorse Portal:Kentucky as a featured portal.-- Bedford 00:48, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the Barnstar
Thank you for the Photo Barnstar. I've been wanting that for some time.-- Bedford 17:27, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

List of assault rifles AfD
I have hastily knocked together a sample treatment of an alternative format for the aforementioned page and posted it to the article's talk page. As you have weighed in on the previous version, I would invite your comments on the alternate I am proposing. Do you think this would make the page more worth keeping? Is it worth the effort to redo the whole page? Is the whole concept a lost cause? Inquiring minds want to know. OlenWhitaker  • talk to me or don't • ♣ ♥ ♠ ♦ 20:19, 12 March 2008 (UTC) 20:19, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
 * I stand by my Delete vote even after the revision. Most of these gun lists I would consider to delete because of duplications of categories. Now all you have is some red links. If you list was something specific about the gun, then it would be different. Like List of Assualt Riffles made by (insert gun company) - Jahnx ( talk ) 00:13, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Barnstar of Recovery
Thankyou for the Barnstar! It means a lot! :-)  Fosnez (talk) 06:53, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Your welcome, with your edits I think that article would have been deleted.- Jahnx ( talk )

David Floyd Verifiability
Jahnx, you rated an article I wrote on Davis Floyd. You commented on the references. In the external links there is a link to a Carnagie Center exhibit in New Albany on the offical Carnagie Center website, that page recounts alot of the info in the article. The specifics of his involvement in the Aaron Burr plot I could not find online, i referenced a book in my library. Here is a link to a google book Google Book on Burr Trial, Page 62 sites that Floyd was also charged with treason but without an explanation. Also, the book i referenced is on google books here Google Book on Burr, check pages 88, 179, 255-6, & 333.Cool10191 (talk) 12:19, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

You're kidding, right?
You should know better than to think that "it's too short" (Buehler Foods) is a legitimate reason to delete. Don't go around trying to destructively nuke someone else's hard work just because you're not interested in doing something constructive like expanding it. If you don't know anything about it yourself, or you're just not interested in the subject, that's fine--so just leave it alone. Let people who care work on it when they're interested. This is patently ludicrous. Kurt Weber ( Go Colts! ) 05:31, 31 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Remember to be Diplomatic and Kind on the wikipedia. The Article doesn't satisfy the WP:NOTE guide lines. It flirts with some speedy deletion categories such as A7. I am giving it a chance by placing the prod on it, it's called alerting the article creator that this article could be delete unless he/she does something about it. You have stopped the prod, now do something about it. If this article remains in this form for any significant amount of time I believe it would result in a deletion. - Jahnx ( talk ) 07:52, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Not legitimately it wouldn't. A short article is no reason to delete. That some people fail to understand how wikis are supposed to work is their problem, not that of article creators. The idea of "notability" is, quite simply, wrong; verifiable existence is the only legitimate criterion needed for inclusion of an article on a given subject. We now have a whole new generation of editors who can cite "policy" backwards and forwards, but who don't actually "get" Wikipedia. "Policy" is only a means to an end--and a pretty poor means at that;  it's certainly not an end in itself, and it's absolutely NOT normative anyway, but merely descriptive of what has been done in the past. Ultimately, we are obligated to do what's best for the encyclopedia, "rules" be damned. So tell me, how would deleting this article be in the best interests of the encyclopedia?

That anyone would ever want to delete a perfectly legitimate article on a perfectly legitimate subject is both saddening and frightening. Kurt Weber ( Go Colts! ) 15:50, 31 March 2008 (UTC)


 * You're obviously consumed with this thought that you can do what ever youd want on wikipedia regardless of facts and if it's worth including into an encyclopedia. - Jahnx ( talk ) 17:16, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Any verifiable, factual information is worth including--that's correct. The whole point of an encyclopedia, after all, is to present the sum of all human knowledge.  Kurt Weber ( Go Colts! ) 16:45, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

The Article Rescue Squadron needs you
Hello, I noticed that you recently signed up to be part of the Article Rescue Squadron at Article Rescue Squadron/Members.

If you have not yet added this template to your user page, please do:

There is a whole list of articles which needed rescuing now:

Category:Articles that have been proposed for deletion but that may concern encyclopedic topics

...can you please take the time and rescue one?

And please watch Article Rescue Squadron for ongoing new developments.

Thank you, Article Rescue Squadron member, Inclusionist (talk) 22:32, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

You OK?
I just realized you haven't been around for a while. Are you OK?-- King Bedford I Seek his grace  04:15, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

Merry Christmas


Gen. Bedford his Forest is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding to their talk page with a friendly message.

Disputed fair use rationale for File:AndrewHorne.JPG}
Thank you for uploading File:AndrewHorne.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:
 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 04:31, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for File:AndrewHorne.JPG}
Thank you for uploading File:AndrewHorne.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:
 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 04:31, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter
Content


 * News items and announcements
 * Contest


 * Featured editor: Teeninvestor
 * Featured administrator: WereSpielChequers


 * Want ads
 * Feature: FeydHuxtable: Search Techniques

File source problem with File:Crescent Hill Branch Library.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Crescent Hill Branch Library.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:54, 29 August 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:54, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

Rescue
Articles for deletion/Armageddon theology WritersCramp (talk) 13:17, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

December 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States
--Kumioko (talk) 02:59, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

January 2012 Newsletter for WikiProject United States and supported projects
--Kumi-Taskbot (talk) 19:06, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Tumbleweedlogo.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Tumbleweedlogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Armbrust The Homunculus 07:11, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:TomGalligan Jeffersonville.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:TomGalligan Jeffersonville.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 03:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

File source problem with File:RichardVissing.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:RichardVissing.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 03:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:40, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Henry Burtt


The article Henry Burtt has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG. Mayor of a small city (current population ~48k, around 10k when he was mayor), who received routine coverage as a mayor but not really anything beyond that to establish notability, which is not automatically conferred for simply being an elected local official. His law-related activites did not receive significant coverage."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DanCherek (talk) 04:40, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of William F. Collum


The article William F. Collum has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG. Mayor of a small city (current population ~48k, around 2k when he was mayor), who did not receive significant coverage as a mayor or city councillor. Per NPOL, notability is not automatically conferred for simply being an elected local official. His medicine-related activites did not receive significant coverage either."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DanCherek (talk) 04:59, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of O.C. Woolley


The article O.C. Woolley has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG. Mayor of a small city (current population ~48k, around 4k when he was mayor), who received routine coverage as a mayor but not really anything beyond that to establish notability, which is not automatically conferred for simply being an elected local official."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DanCherek (talk) 05:07, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Gabriel Poindexter


The article Gabriel Poindexter has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG. Mayor of a small city (current population ~48k, around 6k when he was mayor), who received routine coverage as a mayor but not really anything beyond that to establish notability, which is not automatically conferred for simply being an elected local official. His participation in the Civil War did not receive significant coverage either."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DanCherek (talk) 05:11, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Thomas Rader


The article Thomas Rader has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG. Mayor of a small city (current population ~48k, around 10k when he was mayor), who received routine coverage as a mayor but not really anything beyond that to establish notability, which is not automatically conferred for simply being an elected local official. His business-related activites did not receive significant coverage either."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DanCherek (talk) 05:20, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Joseph Warder


The article Joseph Warder has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG. Mayor / clerk treasurer of a small city (current population ~48k, around 10k when he was mayor), who received routine coverage as a mayor / clerk treasurer but not really anything beyond that to establish notability, which is not automatically conferred for simply being an elected local official."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DanCherek (talk) 05:46, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Harry Poindexter


The article Harry Poindexter has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG. Mayor of a small city (current population ~48k, around 10k when he was mayor), who received routine coverage as a mayor but not really anything beyond that to establish notability, which is not automatically conferred for simply being an elected local official, nor for being an unsuccessful candidate for the U.S. House of Representatives."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DanCherek (talk) 04:17, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Charles Hoodenpyl


The article Charles Hoodenpyl has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG. Mayor of a small city (current population ~48k, around 20k when he was mayor), who received routine coverage as a mayor but not really anything beyond that to establish notability, which is not automatically conferred for simply being an elected local official."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DanCherek (talk) 04:25, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Raymond Parker (politician)


The article Raymond Parker (politician) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG. Mayor / various other elected positions in a small city, without additional claims to notability."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DanCherek (talk) 22:55, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Luther Warder


The article Luther Warder has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG. Mayor of a small city, without additional claims to notability."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DanCherek (talk) 01:33, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

You're invited! Wiki Loves Pride in Indianapolis
(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Indiana-area events by removing your name from this list. Sent on 19:19, 13 June 2022 (UTC).)

July 28: You're invited! Food Deserts & Food Policy in Indianapolis editathon
(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Indiana-area events by removing your name from this list. Sent on 08:54, 18 July 2022 (UTC).)

You're invited! Environmental Justice editathons in Indianapolis & Bloomington
(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Indiana-area events by removing your name from this list. Sent on 01:52, 10 October 2022 (UTC).)

You're invited! In-person WikiConference North America Meetup in Indianapolis!
(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Indiana-area events by removing your name from this list. Sent on 17:16, 4 November 2022 (UTC).)

March 17: You're invited! Indiana Women in the Arts editathon
(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Indiana-area events by removing your name from this list. Sent on 21:02, 8 March 2023 (UTC).)

Nomination of Andrew Horne for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Andrew Horne, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/Andrew Horne (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

You're invited! Indiana Politics & Government Editathon on Saturday, May 13
(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Indiana-area events by removing your name from this list. Sent on 01:27, 5 May 2023 (UTC).)

You're invited! Wiki Loves Pride in Indianapolis
(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Indiana-area events by removing your name from this list. Sent on 16:30, 19 June 2023 (UTC).)

You're invited! Indiana State Fair Wiknic on Sunday, July 30
(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Indiana-area events by removing your name from this list. Sent on 13:53, 22 July 2023 (UTC).)

You're invited! Underrepresented Artists of Indiana editathon on Oct. 11
(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Indiana-area events by removing your name from this list. Sent on 00:49, 5 October 2023 (UTC).) "