User talk:Jalauna1

Jalauna1 (talk) 14:41, 5 July 2017 (UTC)Please stop promoting Lolita fashion by spamming and otherwise interfering with our article Lolita. You were warned about this when you made the same edits as an Ip earlier today. - Arjayay (talk) 12:39, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Hi Arjayay. I understand your concern and confusion. Which is exactly why these updates are necessary. There is constant confusion between the novel Lolita and the Lolita fashion. Updates were made to both wiki pages to help direct users to the correct article. Those in the Lolita industry often are stereotyped to be sexually promiscuous as a direct result of the novel. The updates are not "spam" or "promoting the fashion" as you stated when reversing the updates. I feel you may not be aware of this constant confusion but it has led to much harassment. The updates were, in fact, to help add additional clarity for everybody. This falls in line with Wiki's mission and is very common among more developed Wiki articles to address related topics, including ones that may seem related but are not. The Lolita fashion page was also updated to help clarify the confusion. If this were spam or promoting a specific agenda, this would not be necessary. Again, these updates are not spam or promoting Lolita fashion. It is to clarify the constant confusion that continues to happen. Please, re-instate the changes. Jalauna1 (talk) 13:03, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Lolita. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 14:01, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Per Wiki's Talk Page Guidelines, I will continue this discussion on your talk page. This is so that conversation is correctly preserved in one place. Jalauna1 (talk) 14:55, 5 July 2017 (UTC)