User talk:Jam ai qe ju shikoni

December 2019
Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Dennis Bergkamp seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 21:28, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

February 2020
This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, as you did at Talk:Adolf_Hitler, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people.  LakesideMiners Come Talk To Me! 19:14, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

Zlatan Ibrahimović‎
Please, tell me which policy I have violated by telling you your shitty statistic is shitty. It's a quirk of probability that any player who scores a large number of goals will eventually have scored a goal in each minute of a football match, but it is hardly encyclopaedic. I reverted your edit because you added a lot of unnecessary sourced and a shitty statistic. Please don't add the content back without making a good case for it on the article talk page. – PeeJay 21:42, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

Jam ai qe ju shikoni (talk) 21:53, 25 March 2020 (UTC)Ok, fine, it is not encyclopedic. I won't argue about that. Can I add it somewhere else in the article though (not in the lead)? Also, yes, it is oversourcing. I agree. However, I would argue that some of those souces need to be kept. What is the max. nr of sources you would allow?
 * You only need one source per claim. Adding extra sources is overkill and would give me reason to question the motive for doing so. – PeeJay 21:53, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

I am a football fan, and I wanna make the info as verifiable as possible. It's not that I wanna vandalise Jam ai qe ju shikoni (talk) 21:57, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

Also, please answer my question above Jam ai qe ju shikoni (talk) 21:58, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Fitch Poole for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fitch Poole is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Fitch Poole until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 18:48, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

April 2021
Hello, I'm Doniago. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Bromance, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 13:36, 28 April 2021 (UTC)