User talk:Jan Lukas 22

Welcome!
Hi Jan Lukas 22! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Happy editing! The common practice for the name of a ref is. Grimes2 (talk) 14:35, 4 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Thank you for the (late) welcome! The problem with said common practice is that in | this case applying it would be confusing, because most references come from only few authors (| these ones or the | city of cologne), but I will try to follow it when applicable! Jan Lukas 22 (talk) 15:22, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
 * The name should be unique.  or if no author , but I've never seen a summary of the title. Grimes2 (talk) 15:29, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
 * If I remember correctly I followed the "convention" already present in that article when I started editing it, which I think was a summary of the title. I'm 100% sure that it wasn't  though. But thanks for letting me know! Jan Lukas 22 (talk) 15:49, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Another convention: Blogs are considered as unreliable sources. Grimes2 (talk) 15:33, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Is a blog still unreliable even if there is a professional team of several people behind it? But yes, independent newspaper articles would be better. Jan Lukas 22 (talk) 15:46, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
 * WP:USERGENERATED, I think "Der Unternehmensblog der KVB" is acceptable. Grimes2 (talk) 16:13, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rhein-Ruhr-Express has been accepted
 Rhein-Ruhr-Express, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Rhein-Ruhr-Express help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Bkissin (talk) 20:35, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)