User talk:Jdftba

Genderfluid article
Hello, Jdftba. I've been clear to you here and here why I have redirected genderfluid back to genderqueer. Now I will elaborate: No matter the reported differences between genderqueer and genderfluid among some LGBT people, there are WP:Reliable sources that treat these two terms as synonyms. Because of that, creating a Genderfluid article is essentially a WP:Content fork violation. Because of that, and the fact that there is plenty of room in the Genderqueer article to discuss distinctions between genderqueer and genderfluid, and the fact that your creation of the Genderfluid article was twice a poorly sourced WP:Stub, I redirected redirected genderfluid back to genderqueer. There is no reason that you cannot elaborate on genderfluid in the Genderqueer article, as long as you provide WP:Reliable sources for that matter. These two topics should be WP:Merged. Look at the LGBT article for an example of how we cover variants in one article; we do not create an article for each variant. I also suggest you read Articles for deletion/Agender for where I am coming from on this matter. If you recreate the Genderfluid article again, then I will nominate it for deletion; see WP:AfD. And I know that you are that IP; so recreating the article as an IP does not hide who you are. Flyer22 (talk) 20:54, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hi Jdftba! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Happy editing! ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 21:27, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics
ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 21:27, 14 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Please note that this restriction covers discussions such as the ongoing discussion regarding the reliability of the ADL signed,Rosguill talk 18:15, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

Daniel Maté (composer) moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to Daniel Maté (composer). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Macbeejack &#9742;  08:22, 19 March 2024 (UTC)


 * There hasn't been a large number of like published articles about him. But thats largely cause he's in the podcast space? The few printed articles are mostly transcripts of interviews. But there are many many various podcasts he is on.
 * Basically my argument for notariety is this: When you look up "Daniel Maté" the only result that shows anyone other than this Daniel Maté is the one wikipedia page for the Swedish Billionare. Wikipedia shouldn't be the odd one out.
 * It doesn't make sense that he is notable enough to be every single google page and image for multiple pages, but wikipedia thinks there's a different, more notable, (richer?) Daniel Maté.

I very much encourage you to google Daniel Mate yourself and have that factor into the determination of his notability.
 * May I ask. Is sourcing a large number of podcasts proof of his notariety? How does one capture the notariety of an activist in the youtube/podcast space? At what point does doing enough of them and getting enough views make you notable?
 * Genuine question, I really want to know more about how wikipedia accomidates these things.
 * Thank you for your time. Jdftba (talk) 08:13, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics
TarnishedPathtalk 07:10, 4 June 2024 (UTC)