User talk:Jeffpw/Archive 5

Zodiac
I was trying to learn more about the Zodiac movie tonight, and came across the Zodiac Killer article. After reading the talk page, I decided to drop you a note congratulating you for the great job you've done maintaining a bit of "order" over there and keeping the whole thing within Wikipedia policy. Very nicely done! Esrever 05:25, 1 March 2007 (UTC)


 * I wish I could take credit for the picture&mdash;that one came from someone else. Thanks for the information on the WikiProject for LGBT studies.  I'm going to take a look at some of the stuff on there today.  Sounds like fun!  Esrever 16:32, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

= 1, Jeffpw = 0.

Semi-protect Zodiac page?
Jeff: I have already reverted obvious vandalism by four anonymous IP addresses today at the Zodiac killer entry. What are your thoughts on requesting semi-protection for the page for the next few days?

-- Labyrinth13 23:40, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Hey Jeff... You reverted my edit on Zodiac claiming self-promoting web site. And you also seemed to by your earlier revert of my editing that you had a problem with "anon IP" First off, Wikipedia *does* allow anon IP editing. Secondly, I have no connections with that web site. I'm not promoting anything. I was reading about Zodiac case on wikipedia, cause of the recent movie interest. Somehow I ended up at that site. I found it interesting...don't know the validity of it...or any other Zodiac claims for that matter. I thought others would find it interesting too. It's quite unfair of you to treat my edits as vandalism...they are not! 24.44.44.70 06:59, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

FYI: I have created tools to simply your Where I have been section of your user page
I see you have a list of nations and/or states/provinces on your user page. I would like to offer you some templates for this task I created for my own list. One pair of templates will create entries identical to the one I use. (I suggest you copy my legend if you use them.) Other templates will provide just a flag or name (nation or province/state).


 * Highlights:
 * All use a simple code.
 * Nations are identified with a two letter top-level Internet domain code (except for the United States of America, which uses "USA").
 * States and provinces are identified with postal codes (so far anyway).
 * Nation and state/province names are linked.
 * The low level templates return flag images with just the filename allowing you to control the image size and caption.
 * All flag images located so far are SVG.
 * If any flag images or names on your page officially change, your user page will get the update as soon as I know about it.


 * One drawback:
 * Currently the province templates can only look up data for the United States of America and Canada. However, additional capability can be readily added.  All I need to do is create a starter template and let you add the provinces.


 * Note: Not all templates in this next category are listed in the interests of space. To see a list of the missing functions, please see  and.

Will (Talk - contribs) 08:36, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks!
Thanks for the Barnstar! That was really nice! --DavidShankBone 02:34, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Arthur Leigh Allen
Hi,

Although I was happy to see the excellent rewrite you undertook at Zodiac killer, I feel fairly strongly that the late Mr. Allen needs to be addressed directly in the article. Irrespective of the question of his innocence or guilt (though the former now seems more likely), he was a significant object of media attention for many years, and he didn't shy away from the media spotlight. I think the draft in your sandbox makes a fine beginning for an independent article on him, but leaving him only barely mentioned in the main article seems awkward. I was wondering how you intended to proceed, and I've also come to offer my help. Best wishes, Xoloz 23:04, 2 March 2007 (UTC)


 * I agree with Xoloz. People are going to want to know more about ALA as the movie paints him as THE central suspect.

On a different subject, I noticed you mentioned in a conversation with an editor that you can somehow track the traffic that an article receives. Can you tell me how you do this? Thanks.

Mister Jinxy 14:41, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Redlinks
In answer to your question - which I admit was not addressed to me ;-) - "what is the point in creating redlinks?", you will no doubt be delighted to know that there is a guideline on the subject. For your edification- WP:RED. Enjoy, WjBscribe 12:34, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Gee, there are guidelines for everything. Thanks for pointing that out, WJB. Wikipeidans are so thorough and detail oriented. An example to us all. Jeffpw 15:38, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

V for Vendetta (film)
Thanks for removing the proj tag - I wasn't comfortable doing it myself b/c there was some debate. However, please be careful with your edit summary; I'm not convinced that saying "a few minor gay characters does not a gay theme make" in an edit summary is a good idea. Something more neutral like "See discussions on Wikiproject page" would have been a little gentler, more neutral and possibly less inflective of how we need to view the placement of the project tag. Thanks. Zue Jay (talk)  16:05, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I'll tell you why I used that edit summary: I just saw the film for the first time on Saturday night. I didn't even remember that there were gay characters in it until I looked at the talk page for the article. The summary was no slight on you for placing it there, but simply a reflection of my surprise that it had been put there at all. Jeffpw 16:10, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Hmm...I think this article, along with NAMBLA and FRC, highlights the Wikiproject's need to evaluate/reevaluate how we decide on which articles should be tagged and which shouldn't be. Zue Jay (talk)  16:16, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Zodiac killer external links
Checking the Zodiac killer entry today, I see that User: Heathhunnicutt has included a link to Zodiackiller.com, stating that in his opinion, placing the link there does not violate WP: MOS.

According to Citing_sources, he may have a point, in that the wording there seems to imply that including a link already cited in the main body of the entry is up to personal choice.

Your thoughts?

-- Labyrinth13 18:34, 5 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Well, speaking as Heath Hunnicutt, I want to know why you (Jeffpw) are on a mission to keep the link to zodiackiller.com off the article. The references at the site are actually useful to people trying to crack the various cyphers.  Not all of the material is available at the other sources noted.  I don't see any thing in WP:EL or WP:MOS that specifically applies to the zodiackiller.com link.  It seems that you are using general statements against this specific link.
 * Jeffpw, I appreciate the great edits you have made to Zodiac Killer. I can see from the discussion page that you have been fighting with highly opinionated people who also want the zodiackiller.com link to remain.  I think they have galvanized you -- manipulated the reactionary part of your mind, if you will -- such that you can't see that even non-crazy people think the link should stay.
 * Also, I wonder if you are slipping into WP:OWN a little bit by reverting changes like this multiple times. Clearly, the community does not totally agree with you.
 * Maybe you can enlighten me as to why the zodiackiller.com external link specifically violates WP:EL? If you can't, would you mind restoring the link? Heathhunnicutt 19:49, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Re: Yuser's request for adminship
I reverted your edit to Yuser's most recent request for adminship, as he has not accepted it yet. People voting before the nomination has begun or been accepted is controversial, since it effectively extends the nomination. The only reason I added my support is because I am the nominator. Once Yuser accepts the nomination, I will be sure to readd your vote post haste. Feel free to readd it once Yuser has accepted if I do not. Thanks. --Deskana (talk)   (review me please)  00:18, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Daniel Rodriguez
Can you format Leah's latest links and check the text? I'm linkily-challenged. In fact, I'm somewhat computer illiterate. How's it going by the way? The article might be good to put up for GA, if it hasn't been done already. I think it's a pretty good small biography. KP Botany 05:47, 8 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks, KP Botany 14:33, 8 March 2007 (UTC)


 * I figured GA would be easy--you really did good work, as did others, under trying circumstances. KP Botany 03:24, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Congratulations, Jeff! --DavidShankBone 03:25, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Your BLP noticeboard report
You posted a report last month in this section on the WP:BLP noticeboard - could you post an update in response to the query there? Thanks. — Athænara  ✉  06:18, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Wedding pics.
Ah, wedding pics, how lovely! Shame Enzedbrit blanked his, I really liked that one. Which one are you? Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 10:56, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
 * The little one. LOL. And I actually think Enzedbrit's pic was nicer, *but* mine is useful as an encyclopedia illustration. Adding a "Confetti Blizzard" wedding pic now. :-). And thank you for noticing, Dev! it was truly the happiest day of my entire life. Jeffpw 11:06, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Awww! You guys look adorable! :-) It makes one wonder about the future... *dreamy eyes about potentially getting married* Haha Raystorm 11:15, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Hehehehehe. I can heartily recommend marriage to anybody, Raystorm. Isaäc and I have been together going on 15 years now, and I would be lost without him. Jeffpw 11:17, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
 * You didn't say when you were married, so if it is not too untimely to say so at this point, congratulations on joining the ranks of the "hitched for life" crowd. And best of luck for the future to you both.  Labyrinth13 16:47, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks, Labyrinth. It's been many years, but we still feel like newlyweds. :-) Jeffpw 18:52, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Zodiac killer mediation
Thanks for your advice. I will sign agree only if you will join in as I don't feel that I am the only party directly involved there. I have added you as a party to the mediation. What say you?

-- Labyrinth13 19:30, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Request for assistance
Jeff: I would like to set up my user page to archive my discussion threads similar to what you have done on your page, but have no clue how to proceed.

Any chance I could get you to set my page up like your's for me?

Thanks. Labyrinth13 20:29, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Challenge!
Hi Jeffpw! I challenge you to a Jumpaclass contest! ;-) Pick any LGBT article, I'll do the same, and we'll see who improves it further in just one week! Raystorm 16:50, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I sense fear. :-) Raystorm 15:50, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
 * No, my dear, it's not fear. I just don't have a lot of time at the moment to take on any more articles. I have my regular job for 30 hours a week, advanced course work to go further in my job which takes 16 hours a week, and on top of that research and interviews for a book I'm writing. When I come to Wikipedia I end up staying too long and using time I should be spending elsewhere. And...the last time I did a jump challenge nobody gave me the credit for jumping even though they said it had jumped. So I said phooey....but thanks for the offer; it's nice to be thought of. Jeffpw 16:56, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

Bot
Just to let you know there's nothing wrong with your achive code for Werdnabot. It has been blocked due to a malfunction. You could get MiszaBot III to take over- see my comment on Satyr's talkpage... WjBscribe 14:22, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks a lot, WJB! I've put in a request over there. This is sort of like Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines! These damn bots will take over the world if we don't watch out. Jeffpw 15:14, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
 * And sheesh--you're always walking behind me, WJB, cleaning up mymess (just saw your message on Misza's page). You're like the guys with the elephants in the circus parade! Jeffpw 15:16, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
 * LOL. Glad to help. Actually I was there to discuss the need for more Bot switchovers with Misza if Werdnabot may be out of action indefinitely. But that redlink did rather stand out! WjBscribe 15:19, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

Very late reply
Jeff, I apologize for not replying sooner. Has Zodiac killer taken care of itself or do you still need intervention? I did look at it a week ago and, TBH, I thought the issue you were asking about was minor. But I did cringe at the sources when looking in general, and at the difficulty one would have on an article like this. Put simply, the primary references in the article are not based on a reliable source. But then, if you can't use this, you have nothing to go on, so it's very difficult. Can you dig up a reliable replacement to the info on zociackiller.com? Do you want a further reply from me? Is there edit warring an admin needs to look at? Marskell 21:31, 12 March 2007 (UTC)


 * I will look at what I can. You have pointed to this as unresolved. I will try to get a fulll grip on "this", before commenting further. Marskell 22:03, 12 March 2007 (UTC)


 * At a glance, I actually think the external link to labyrinth13 should be removed. There's no way around the fact that it links directly to a page selling a book. EL is a guideline, not a policy, but we need to be pretty firm about commercial links. Zodiackiller.com is difficult: the article heavily relies on it and to not use would mean gutting things. Marskell 12:30, 13 March 2007 (UTC)


 * I just noticed again "cited on TV and in newspapers." Perhaps Zodiackiller is OK, but it doesn't spell out its editorial oversight etc. Marskell 12:33, 13 March 2007 (UTC)


 * I hope I am not butting in, but can I add my two cents here? Firstly, I appreciate Marskell's help with this. Second, I have no problem with my link being removed and have said that all along.  But what if I were to remove the book advertisements from the Zodiac page that is linked, would that still disqualify the direct link to my website's Zodiac pages? Please advise.  Lastly, I know enough about zodiackiller.com to be able to say that there is probably no editorial oversight beyond that which is provided by Tom Voigt, the webmaster. Voigt's information there is gleaned from books and periodicals on the case and from his discussions with various primary people involved in the investigation.  To his credit, he has based parts of the information there on actual police reports, but as far as I know, he rarely cites a source for anything and he has never published through any agency that would see that his information is vetted or checked for accuracy.  (It is worth noting here that when I was doing research for the chapter of my book on the Zodiac case, I did not cite a single source from zodiackiller.com for all the same reasons being brought into question here).  Thanks to you both.  Labyrinth13 13:30, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Using zodiackiller.com as a source
On the “Very Late Reply” thread here on your talk page, Marskell wrote the following concerning the heavy reliance that the Zodiac killer entry presently has on zodiackiller.com for its cited sources, noting that:

I just noticed again "cited on TV and in newspapers." Perhaps Zodiackiller is OK, but it doesn't spell out its editorial oversight etc.

Although I know that this will open up a gigantic can of worms, as things stand at present, the main entry relies heavily on zodiackiller.com for many of its notes and citations.

I would prefer to see alternative sources cited for the entry and that we use zodiackiller.com primarily for links to pages that have images of letters and other Zodiac correspondence that are kept on that site.

My reasons for this are as follows:

In my reading of the Wikipedia rules regarding cited sources, it seems to me that secondary sources are preferred over primary ones, mainly because secondary sources generally have a proven "track record" and have been checked by experts for accuracy.

WP:RS defines secondary sources as those that have been generated via reliable publishers and/or that which has been subjected to professional peer review, and not the opinions of those who have read and interpreted source material for themselves, which in my opinion, seems to be the case with much of the material found on zodiackiller.com; virtually no sources are cited there for the majority of the information, with the exception of those sources linked to or noted as coming from police reports.

While the information on Voigt’s website seems to rely on both primary and secondary sources, I cannot find anyplace there where Voigt gives full citation to any of the secondary sources that he obviously built his site on. A cursory look through his website will bear that observation out. For example, in the Arthur Leigh Allen section of Voigt’s website alone, the beginning of the article makes a multitude of general statements about Allen without citing the first source for where any of that information originally comes from.

Others have pointed out in the past that many television and other news agencies have made reference to Voigt’s website, which is a true statement. And I have also seen the media cite Voigt’s site, but I know of no examples where the media used zodiackiller.com as a source for verifying their own information, but usually simply as an example of the novel work conducted by amateur investigators working independently of police groups. As such, I don’t think that the mere fact that the media has made mention of Voigt’s site indicates an endorsement of the information as presented on zodiackiller.com.

If it is determined that zodiackiller.com is not a reliable source per WP:RS, then the only alternative will be to spend time finding and citing sources from published secondary sources, which as anyone familiar with the case knows, means Graysmith and Kelleher.

I would love to hear your thoughts on this. Thanks.

-- Labyrinth13 19:01, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Matters concerning advocacy of pedophilia
Please refer all matters concerning advocacy of pedophilia directly to the Arbitration Committee. Please don't bring the matter up in other forums. Fred Bauder 17:10, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Bring your question directly to the arbitration committee using email. I will answer it there. Fred Bauder 17:12, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

Yuser's RfA
FYI he's "striked" your comment.. Matthew 22:20, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

Hey Jeff
"Sexiest Wikipedian"? LOL - I'm just glad there isn't a swimsuit competition! Or else I'd lose out to Trevor - (Image:Ejaculation sample.jpg) --DavidShankBone 13:47, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I dunno....I'd vote for David. : - ) NickBurns 14:15, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, I'm 1.8 meters (Did I do the conversion right? 6'3 - I'm retarded with conversions), but I don't know if I could produce anything as--- ---artistic as Trevor's shot. Although I am 50% German, 25% Dutch. --DavidShankBone 14:17, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
 * You sold yourself short by 10 cm, David...which naturally begs the question of whether or not you've sold yourself short in other areas:-) I think you just need the proper encouragement to reach your...err... full potential. hehehehheheee. Yes, Nick, I voted for David, too, right on his talk page. And after this discussion I definitely feel we need to include a swimsuit category. Maybe even a wet jockey shorts contest! Jeffpw 14:27, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Are either of you on Friendster? --DavidShankBone 14:40, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Yes, I am as a matter of fact. Surprise, surprise. I don't even remember registering. I'm there as Jeff Woloson and I even have a friend. :-) Will wonders never cease. Jeffpw 14:48, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I didn't find anyone under that name - look me up and add me - David Shankbone. --DavidShankBone 14:54, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm all for the wet shorts contest, to be judged by Jeff and I! NickBurns 16:23, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
 * If we did the wet shorts contest, I'm afraid the sock I shove in my pants every morning would be of little use. lol.  --DavidShankBone 18:10, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

Your user page is *randy* Jeff! --DavidShankBone 18:10, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Err, randy??????? Gracious! Try as I might, I can't find anything randy about it. Is there something hidden there I can't see???????
 * Wet short contests, ejaculation photo links, sock-stuffing... and let's not even talk about that cat...(joke!) --DavidShankBone 18:17, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Ah. And this is me on a dull day. You might faint dead away if you caught me when I was truly feeling my cheerios! Jeffpw 18:19, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

Dusty, etc.
Thanks for the note on the Julia Barr article cleanup. As for signing that letter, I think she did. At least, according to the "Dancing with Demons" biography. I think as much as she may have had a rebellious image...she also really respected tradition. I don't think she wanted to piss off the royals! NickBurns 14:15, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Argh, now "Tulsa" will be in my head for the rest of the day! I love just about everything she did, to some degree or another. The "typical" divas (ie, Cher, Midler, et al) don't do much for me, but I have a few -Dusty, Kirsty MacColl, and Joni Mitchell. NickBurns 16:25, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Since David (aka Hottest Wikipedian) asked, I am on Friendster: http://www.friendster.com/3836320 - not on there much, usually on LiveJournal. NickBurns 16:34, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Tried to add you as a friend, but it didn't let me. Phooey:(. Here I am:, though I don't go there that often, either. Jeffpw 16:41, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

Enlightened intellectual?
Check out this comment. --DavidShankBone 19:19, 16 March 2007 (UTC) Replied on the talk page. Jeffpw 19:36, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

Braveheart
Thanks, mate. Very much appreciated--both that purply thing I'll wear proudly and your comment on the FARC page. I keep waiting for Gerald Ford to finally make his way to the stage: "My fellow Wikipedians, our long B movie nightmare is over." All the best, Dan.—DCGeist 23:37, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

Toot own horn
My article Tompkins Square Park Police Riot just passed GA status! Woo-hoo! Now I'm waiting on Evan Wolfson... --David Shankbone 16:43, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm waiting for Wolfson to be reviewed. I'd like to submit the riot article for FA status.  Hey, did you read about this poor fellow:  http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/12/AR2007031201640.html  --David Shankbone 12:54, 18 March 2007 (UTC)



Please contact me
Jeff: I could not find a link on your talk page to send you a private message. If you are so inclined, could you visit my talk page and send me an email? I have something I'd like to discuss with you. Thanks. Labyrinth13 17:42, 19 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Email sent to you today via the Wiki-link on your talk page. Labyrinth13 17:48, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

Hi
Hi Jeff.

I noticed that, on your userpage, you had the following message:


 * 5) Making sure that Wikipedia stays safe for all.

Is there any particular reason you have included the text? I consider it fairly likely I will become an admin in the future and I'd prefer you pointed out what I've done wrong instead of posting a rant on your userpage. Yuser31415 20:02, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Yuser, have you actually read any of the diffs provided in your RfA? You aren't going become an admin for a very, very long time, if at all. You apparently have too much of a 'tude, don't edit in the mainspace enough, and argue even when you're shown to be in the wrong. Seriously, go do something where you'll be appreciated, like write an FA or try your hand at mediation. Trying again at RfA before the summer will be an exercise in masochism. Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 20:14, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

Bailey
Quote policy the way others can quote catechism? Please, you have to do more than say "WP:REDFLAG!!" over and over to be a true wikicatechumen. :) But you're right, it is a bit odd. On the other hand, vandalism patrol is often something that seems to appeal to men when they first sign up, so he may well be legit. Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 20:20, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

My sympathies
Li'l Peter is one thing. But dear god, I see you're grappling with Saint KSB. You know you're staring into the abyss there, mate.—DCGeist 08:40, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
 * KSB probably deserves our sympathy, not abuse, suffering as he does from OCD (and hitting the refresh button on your watchlist every 15 seconds certainly qualifies as OCD in my book). But yes, I am staring into the abyss. I must admit, though, that I am learning the art of the filibuster watching him at work. He's waging a war of attrition on the James Buchanan talk page. Jeffpw 08:53, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry
Who to who? --David Shankbone 14:15, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
 * It's understandable. You know, I have moments in my history where I got out of hand, or was too emotional in my editing, but I always recognized it.  I certainly wasn't fooling myself.  It's amazing when people can't see their own behavior.  As if a Talk page of warnings, blocks and responses full of snide, defensive remarks isn't evidence enough...  Hopefully Ivo will make some good edits.  He seems pretty reasonable.  But there are now 9 editors in support...this doesn't seem to be all the controversial except for one persistent editor who can't keep his finger off the "Refresh" button for his watchlist.  Even other editors who initially seemed to voice lukewarm support for his position have backed away, likely due to his war cries.   --David Shankbone 14:54, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

I dare you to propose this sentence for the lead in the Buchanan article: James Buchanan (April 23, 1791 – June 1, 1868), also known as Aunt Fancy, was the 15th president of the United States (1857–1861).

LOL - --David Shankbone 03:16, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

RfA
Thanks for updating the count which I forgot to do. Chrislintott 11:14, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

I can't keep secrets!
After looking at your User page, I have a gift coming your way, but I'm horrible at keeping these things in - never tell me anything you don't want others to know! Let's hope it happens...read below:

from		"Cynspr@aol.com"  to		davidshankbone@gmail.com date		Mar 21, 2007 5:39 PM subject		Re: Daniel Rodriguez Wikipedia Shoot It would be New York/Staten Island - Daniel is performing at the Nicks Game March 28 and Rangers April 1 I will ask him to pick a date and a place to see if what works for you Cynthia --David Shankbone 03:14, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh my, David! That would be so cool!!!!!!!!!! If it does happen, please tell him you know somebody who worked hard on his Wikipedia biography!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! You get to meet the most fabulous people! Jeffpw 07:59, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

so...
Do you want to request the checkuser, or should I? — coe l acan — 08:55, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I do so hate admin chores, Coelacan, and you're so much better at that sort of thing:-)....which reminds me: why haven't you made a grab for the mop and vaporizer yet? (and I miss the pretty líl kittycat on my page). Jeffpw 08:57, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Eh, mop, I will when I feel like I need it. I'll go do the checkuser request. It was the "I used to edit wikipedia articles, but left because of user abuse. I myself have been subjected to attack by the LGBT community because of differences of opinion on religious issues" that suggested it to you, yes? — coe l acan — 09:08, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Where the hell are all these cat pictures coming from?! And how cat expressions are there?! Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 09:10, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Yup, that was it. Couldn't be more obvious to me. I suppose it might be rjb, but that would surprise me more. But it is an obvious sockpuppet in either case. I note he has put that offensive userpage back up. By the way, nice kitty. :-) Jeffpw 09:11, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Rbj is not banned or blocked and so would have no reason to sock. Those statements are really not Rbj's style either; he's not weird like that. Dev: I get them from Commons:Cats and its categories. =) — coe l acan — 09:34, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks
For the back-up on the Tara Subkoff page. It's such a typically American fight. Clearly this person hasn't left the country and gone on a public beach, or he wouldn't find breasts so objectionable. Out of 500 photographs I've put on here, four have exposed boobs. But it's a nice little fantasy I have that my $160.00 6 megapixel could actually get me started in a photography career when I "fail out of law school" - LOL! He articulated my deepest, darkest desires and fears so, so well. haha. It's interesting how often people ascribe motivations to other people to justify their own behavior/response. --David Shankbone 13:58, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Apologies
I'm sorry that my deletion of a vote seems to have created an issue on the Buchanan article. I've asked to be left well enough out of it on that article. Hope all is well with you. NickBurns 18:07, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your note
I appreciate your note on my talk page. What's past is past, and I'm certain that we can both improve the project moving forward. Ironically enough, I think you'll find that I'm closer politically to you than you might think, based on our disagreements in the past. I am very hopeful that we can move forward and work in harmony for the betterment of the project. Thanks again for the nice note.K. Scott Bailey 16:57, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

nooo
not my logic! you'll hurt my kitties' feelings. — coe l acan — 13:42, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * All right--I'm meowing with the rest of them now. Jeffpw 13:55, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * =D I rather like the sound of logic cats. — coe l acan — 19:32, 25 March 2007 (UTC)