User talk:Jenzzyuk

I see you have been experimenting with Wikipedia. Your change was determined to be unhelpful, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. Wikipedia's  False Prophet   holla at me 02:30, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Wild's Album cover.jpg
This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:Wild's Album cover.jpg. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:43, 29 August 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. Thank you. HermesBot 18:43, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

can you Please Let me put a page about Izzy and if you tdont please can you tell me why I cant as I can try better.

why are you deleating it as I really Need to do a thing about IZZY Johnston A tag has been placed on Izzy Johnston requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

A tag has been placed on Izzy Johnston requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Blanchardb- Me • MyEars • MyMouth -timed 21:36, 8 January 2008 (UTC)



Welcome
Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question and then place  before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Katr67 (talk) 21:41, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

January 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive, was indentified as vandalism, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Katr67 (talk) 21:42, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Katr67 (talk) 21:42, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. -- 12 N oo n 2¢ 21:44, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, one or more of the external links you added do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. -- 12 N oo n 2¢ 15:20, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

Assistance
Hello, I noticed you are posting a request on the Signatures page. Unfortunately, that is the improper forum. If you still want assistance/feedback regarding your article, you might want to post your request at Help desk instead. I hope this helps! Regards.-- 12 N oo n 2¢ 19:32, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Your message on Requests for page protection
Your message on the Requests for page protection page was in the wrong place. The Harry Judd page is protected due to a dispute- any changes you wish to be made will have to be discussed/requested on the Talk:Harry Judd page. MorganaFiolett (talk) 13:18, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

Harry judd
Hi. First off, if you want to leave me a message, do it on my talk page, not my userpage. Second, the page has been fully protected until the dispute over whether or not Harry's personal affairs are worthy of inclusion is resolved. Your last edit comment, I have taken the Part of Harry's Personal Life away so Please do not re add it because I will just end up Taking off again but I might not as I might just let you off this time you never know, smacks of suggested ownership. However, the Lohan information is notable, as it received widespread coverage; it is verifiable, since we have reputable sources; and it is NPOV. The information about Izzy Johnston may well not be notable, and that could be removed. However, if you wish to remove these items, which are clearly a contentious issue, I suggest you bring it up on Talk:Harry Judd where a consensus can be reached without an edit war. - mattbuck 13:25, 11 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Hi. There appears to be some confusion. I had nothing to do with the removal of the article on Izzy. From what I understand from your talk page, it was speedily deleted as it did not assert her notability. Also, please remember to sign your messages on talk pages. - mattbuck 19:57, 11 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Speedy deletion means that it was deleted without having to go through an AfD (Articles for Deletion nomination). More information is available here, or read the item on this page about notability of Izzy Johnston. - mattbuck 21:53, 11 January 2008 (UTC)


 * In all fairness, is she actually notable as a person? Has she received significant media coverage that couldn't be contained in the main article about the band? I appreciate that you tried hard, but Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. - mattbuck 23:12, 11 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Again, please stop deleting notable, sourced information from Harry Judd. This has been identified as vandalism. If you feel there are legitimate reasons why it should NOT be included, bring them up on the talk page. -mattbuck 22:59, 19 January 2008 (UTC)


 * You are deleting, notable, sourced information. If you really feel it shouldn't belong on the page, argue your case on the talk page. -mattbuck 12:16, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 19:26, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

eScala
As mentioned above back in January, when you add content to talk pages you need to sign your comments, otherwise you make it difficult for other users to know who has left the comment. It is very easy to sign messages as explained above by just typing four tildes (four of these ~) at the end of your message. Also please do not remove other users messages from talk pages, it is considered vandalism, no matter what your reasons for doing so. If you wish to revert your own comments and remove them after you have added a message then fair enough, but you should not also remove other users messages. In reply to your message though on Talk:eScala (group), which I have restored so that I can reply to it, you need to provide a reliable source to confirm that Chantal Leverton played at the party. Just saying on the talk page and in an edit summary that she did is not proof nor a reliable source unfortunately! Is there nothing on the groups website or anywhere else to confirm it? There must be something surely? And please don't forget to sign your messages on discussion pages! Thank you - and have fun. ♦Tangerines♦ · Talk 16:16, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Laura Coleman
Hi

I appreciate this is upsetting for you, but you must be careful with editing. You have removed the ref for the previous quote in your haste to delete the Danny thing. I have fixed that for you.

As for the Danny thing, it was badly worded and then edited more correctly, but one of the principal BLP guidelines (see top) is that any references that are libelous should be removed. If however someone chooses to find more references and put it back in then it must stay until disproved. As yet the Mail is the only source and so rightly I would leave it out.

Thanks --Chaosdruid (talk) 19:57, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

Hi there, It was the Mail It was the News of the world. 13.57 13th February 2009 Jenzzyuk


 * I'm pretty sure the news of the world quoted from the Daily mail so I didn't count them separately lol - I don't think anyone is going to put that back in soon. I keep pages that have been vandalised on my watch list for a month so if anything happens I'll be there in the background to make sure it is kept civil, referenced and PoV
 * Cheers --Chaosdruid (talk) 18:16, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Hi there

can you please make sure People dont change dougie and Frankie's Pages on here as I am fed up of having to Edit the page so can you Make sure that No body changes their Pages?

User: Jenzzyuk (Talk: Jenzzyuk/Talk) 12:54 03/05/2009

May 2009
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, even if you intend to fix them later. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. [ジャム] [ t -  c  ] 10:31, 25 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Please also do not remove others' messages from talk pages unless they are clearly not discussing the article, as you did here. Thanks. -mattbuck (Talk) 11:35, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. [ジャム] [ t -  c  ] 13:37, 25 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Please stop re-adding your query about Wild splitting up on the talk page, especially since you keep blanking the rest of the page in the process. If nothing is mentioned in the article, a search on the Internet may reveal details of why they split up.  [ジャム] [ t  -  c  ] 21:07, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Template:Izzy Johnston
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Template:Izzy Johnston, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, Template:Izzy Johnston appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Template:Izzy Johnston has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Furball3 (talk) 15:37, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

'The Borrowers' Hi there, someone has been really changing the Borrowers Mini Series Page can you please change it for me as it the Person as really ruined the Page for everyone else?

'''User: Jenzzyuk Talk 09:03 05/06/2011

February 2023
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:Chris Evans (actor), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 14:39, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)