User talk:Jeppiz/Archives/2013/February

Disambiguation link notification for February 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Khazars, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Uyghur (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:13, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Tags
I think you need an Undue tag, not a POV tag. The undue tags are placed in the section and that section is already tagged. Also, tagging now will just add heat and we will all be old and gray arguing about it for ever. In general, dramatic acts during a discussion only generate more heat and will just take up life. I suggest you just tag he section with Undue rather than the whole article. Thanks. History2007 (talk) 22:50, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

WP:3RR
Please do not let a WP:SPA take you out with him. He may have no worry about 3RR, for he is a WP:SPA. And please do not give them excuses by using the word dishonest. Please choose your words carefully. This will go back on ANI and what you say will be remembered and aired there. History2007 (talk) 01:47, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

ANI comment
Your comment is fine, but it should be at the bottom of the section and signed with a new timestamp. See tpg for practices on refactoring own comments. NE Ent 14:30, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

Notice of Dispute resolution discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute in which you may have been involved. Content disputes can hold up article development, therefore we are requesting your participation to help find a resolution. The thread is "Jesus,Argument from silence". {| style="border: 0; width: 100%;"
 * style="width: 50%; vertical-align: top;" |
 * style="width: 50%; vertical-align: top;" |

If you wish to open a DR/N filing, click the "Request dispute resolution" button below this guide or go to Dispute resolution noticeboard/request for an easy to follow, step by step request form.

What this noticeboard is:


 * It is an early step to resolve content disputes after talk page discussions have stalled. If it's something we can't help you with, or is too complex to resolve here, our volunteers will point you in the right direction.

What this noticeboard is not:


 * It is not a place to deal with the behavior of other editors. We deal with disputes about article content, not disputes about user conduct.
 * It is not a place to discuss disputes that are already under discussion at other dispute resolution forums.
 * It is not a substitute for the talk pages: the dispute must have been discussed extensively on a talk page (not just through edit summaries) before resorting to DRN.
 * It is not a court with judges or arbitrators that issue binding decisions: we focus on resolving disputes through consensus, compromise, and explanation of policy.

Things to remember:


 * Discussions should be civil, calm, concise, neutral, and objective. Comment only about the article's content, not the other editors.   Participants who go off-topic or become uncivil may be asked to leave the discussion.
 * Let the other editors know about the discussion by posting {{subst:drn-notice}} on their user talk page.
 * Sign and date your posts with four tildes " ".
 * If you ever need any help, ask one of our volunteers, who will help you as best as they can. You may also wish to read through the FAQ page located here and on the DR/N talkpage.

Please take a moment to review the simple guide and join the discussion. Thank you! EarwigBot   operator  /  talk 16:44, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

IP?
I was deliberately not looking at all the events of the past ANI threads, but I happened to notice this this change of public signature and then saw this previous revert, then this one and they seem pretty close - geographically. I am not sure if that means that we all may have some type of previous history together that some of us may have been unaware of. But there was some type of other IP edit from Oregon in the middle of those ANI discussions in the past 5-6 days and I can not remember where it was. Do you remember it? Thanks. History2007 (talk) 21:19, 24 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Ok, now after a few more clicks: this was it on that thread. And this one as well. All very close in geography as well as mindset. History2007 (talk) 22:14, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

Heads up
Just to let you know that this is not ANI material - it's an announcement not an incident, and thus normally belongs on WP:AN (✉→BWilkins←✎) 12:56, 25 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Thanks! You're of course completely right, and I even knew that. Wrote it in a hurry, stupid mistake on my part.Jeppiz (talk) 13:09, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

89.168.113.120
The IP editor whom you've appeared to have dealings with, appears to be engaging in disruptive editing at the article Vang Pao. I see that you had previously left a lvl 4 warning on his page on the 20th of February. I reverted the editors deletion of content, what I thought at the time was a good faith edit that changed the context of the content, which the editor has since reverted. I am curious as to how we should move forward regarding this IP editor.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 20:49, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

Re: Quran
I have replied to your comment on the article's talk page. I trust that if you read the reasoning (not having to agree with all of it - the political bias conclusion is a bit iffy for me), you will agree that the deletion of the paragraph was obviously justified.

Meanwhile, please do not assume such malice from an editor. It was extremely insulting and hurtful. SamuelRiv (talk) 03:14, 27 February 2013 (UTC)