User talk:Jgwilliams873

Disambiguation link notification for December 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gemini 4, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Lovell ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Gemini_4 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Gemini_4?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 17 December 2018 (UTC)

Hellraiser
Doug Bradley wasn't added yet!?!? Thanx for doing so, jeez... Oxygene7-13 (talk) 20:33, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Expedition 62


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Expedition 62 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. -★- PlyrStar93  → Message me. ← 04:16, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

Astronaut (2019 film) moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Astronaut (2019 film), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Girth Summit  (blether) 20:15, 25 August 2019 (UTC)

August 2019
Your addition to Draft:Astronaut (2019 film) has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. You can't just copy and paste from websites. Girth Summit  (blether)  20:20, 25 August 2019 (UTC)

Advice
Hi - I just noticed the edit summary you left when you created the page about the Astronaut film - you wanted help making the page, rather than deleting it. I'm happy to offer you a bit of advice on this. Cheers Girth Summit  (blether)  20:28, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
 * First - work on it in draft space, it's not ready to be an article until you've got a couple of reliable sources and some content.
 * Look for sources - you don't need hundred, but you should at least be able to find two sources which are reliably published and independent of the film. Marketing material, or stuff published by their marketing team, doesn't count; nor do passing mentions in articles about other stuff, or rehashed press releases. You're looking for significant coverage in independent media.
 * If you can find that, write up a basic stub, perhaps mentioning the company making the film, the actors who will appear in it, and a summary of the plot in your own words.
 * DO NOT copy and paste stuff you find online. That's a copyright violation, and we can't host it here, not even in draft space.
 * Once you're ready, if you'd like to drop me a note on my talk page, I'll check it over and move it into draft space. Alternatively, you could put it through the AfC process and wait for another reviewer to pick it up. I'd caution you against publishing it directly yourself - you can technically do that, but I'd honestly suggest that you ask me or someone else to review it first while you're still learning the ropes.

December 2019
Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Robert Benton, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". For all other edits, stop marking your changes as minor. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 19:54, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

Knives Out Genre
We discussed this briefly in the talk page, but after further investigation as per WP:FILMLEAD consensus, films stick to the main genre in the lead sentence. The main genre for Knives Out is mystery.Nemov (talk) 20:05, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Astronaut (2019 film) concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Astronaut (2019 film), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Astronaut (2019 film)


Hello, Jgwilliams873. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Astronaut".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! TJRC (talk) 00:05, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

Darrell Mudra
Jgwilliams873, thanks for taking an interest in the Darrell Mudra article. Mudra's 1965 North Dakota State Bison football team did not win an FCS title. That subdivision did not exist before 1978, when it was known as NCAA Division I-AA. Also the use of "champion" in the championships field is redundant. Jweiss11 (talk) 00:45, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

ANI discussion
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Yosemiter (talk) 16:05, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

Blocked
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Johnuniq (talk) 23:47, 10 August 2021 (UTC) You were warned on this talk page (1 July 2021) that collaboration is required and the July 2021 ANI discussion should have been sufficient to alert you to the fact that your efforts to add tags to articles were opposed by other editors. The current ANI report and your recent contributions show that the problems would continue if unchecked. A recent revert is particularly troubling because it shows that the previous editor had removed your tag with a full explanation in the edit summary, yet you reverted with no explanation. You can be unblocked if you provide a convincing reason to believe that this behavior will never be repeated. Johnuniq (talk) 23:47, 10 August 2021 (UTC)