User talk:Jhawkinson

Sandbox
User:Jhawkinson/Sandbox

Todo
(untouched since Feb. 2008, whoops...)
 * 1) Add picture to Cue mark
 * 2) Convert List of motion picture film stocks to tabular form; still waiting on feedback.
 * 3) Update something for MP Photographic processing: ECP-2D, ECN, etc. Even E-6 process could use work... (List of photographic processes, Category:Photographic processes
 * 4) Telecine -> Telecine (piracy)
 * 5) Address rampant confusion in Surround sound
 * 6) Three-phase electric power issues, more
 * 7) Film perforations, table of dimensions
 * 8) WikiProject Filmmaking/Assessment list-class and other template omissions, Wikipedia talk:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment, Template:Grading scheme, Template:WikiProject Filmmaking, Template talk:WikiProject Filmmaking
 * 9) Cues disambiguation?
 * 10) Cue sheet rename ? --- what a mess!
 * 11) Contact print and Contact printer expand for MP
 * 12) dolby stereo/dolby surround/sr/a/nr/etc.
 * 13) * Dolby SR: Dolby Stereo SR, Dolby Analog SR
 * 14) * Dolby noise reduction system: Dolby-B Noise Reduction, Dolby-B, Dolby A
 * 15) * Dolby Laboratories has overviews of all pertinent
 * 16) * Dolby Stereo has mergetags, discussion: Dolby Stereo 70 mm Six Track
 * 17) * Dolby Surround has mergetags
 * 18) * Dolby Pro Logic has mergetags
 * 19) Telecine / motion picture film scanner merger ?
 * Universal film leader, Countdown, Leader blah!
 * User talk:Green451 in re 16mm film
 * User talk:Wahiba in re Film stock and 9.5mm film
 * Talk:Windowbox (film) in re irony
 * 1) Talk:Coded_Anti-Piracy
 * 2) Trailer cleanup and Teaser trailer. merge tag fixes.
 * 3) Foot-lambert lowercase issues via User talk:Ian Strachan
 * 4) PDFbot issues via User talk:Dispenser
 * 5) Platter (the horror!)
 * 6) National Electric Code, Electrical conduit
 * 7) deluxe's FCT(tm) CAP
 * Template:Comparison of video formats navbox, incorporating res/etc. info for formats in Template:Home video and perhaps also Template:AVconn
 * Liaden universe booklist updates, &c.
 * 1) Rename Template:Home video
 * 2) Issueskid's surround edits
 * 3) Tobermori's perforation edits

Cambridge Tall buildings/references
When it comes to references I am not the best. Hertz1888 usually cleans up my work. As for the building heights in these studies, these are the best that are available to me at this time. Once I am back in the states I plan on spending a day down in Cambridge digging through archives of city planning records to get the numbers straight on a lot of these buildings. Expect revisions to most of the buildings on this list after that. For the mean time, this is the best I can get off the internet and from archboston.org. If you have additional leads, please let me know. Mountainfister2015 (talk) 19:42, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

Re: John R. Tunheim
Okay, I'm curious. Where in the Manual of Style or otherwise does it say to leave a WP:REDLINK due to being linked from other pages? Wouldn't that warrant then the creation of said page? Snickers2686 (talk) 05:36, 30 January 2021 (UTC)


 * I'm puzzled by your question because you cited WP:REDLINK, which is pretty clear: "Do not remove red links unless you are certain that Wikipedia should not have an article on that subject." [emphasis in original] Do you really think you can meet that high standard?


 * Obviously number of other links is one indicator of the notability of a topic, but of course it's not dispositive. But yes, existing of a redlink means that a page is warranted, so yes I think the page is warrented. Feel free to create it, although I think it's a challenging one to get good information on, so I think it'd be hard to write even a good stub (but still doable!) jhawkinson (talk) 05:41, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:MNR links as0
Template:MNR links as0 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:40, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)