User talk:Jhfrontz

Re: Additional Function
Hi there,

sorry about the long delay, but I've finally gotten around to beefing up my bot a little, and now it should be able to handle et al. properly. Just for the hell of it, I've added in vitro, in vivo, and in silico too. Typographical Nirvana awaits :) Cheers, CmdrObot 00:15, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Administrate -> Administer
How 'bout adding "administrate" (and administrated and administrating) to the list of things your 'bot fixes? Use of this made-up word and its tenses seems to be a common error across a lot of pages. --Jhfrontz (talk) 06:30, 16 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Hi again,


 * Personally, I agree with you, "administrate" feels like a longer and over-complicated way of saying "administer." However, I did a bit of digging, and according to Bartleby it's a perfectly valid word and has been around since the 17th century. Since Wikipedia's style guide seems to be silent on the issue, I think it would be better to leave this one alone for the time being.


 * Thanks for the suggestion all the same. CmdrObot (talk) 13:01, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

hyphens are our friends!
Well there you go! (You learn something new every day.) Pdfpdf (talk) 16:06, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Sorry, hyphenation of  compound adjectives is a one of those "I'll fix the world!"  (or is it "I'll-fix-the-world"?) campaigns that rages in my troubled mind ;-) --Jhfrontz (talk) 16:38, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
 * I'll draw your attention to an extract from the words of an old (1984) Sting song: Consider Me Gone:
 * I've spent too many years at war with myself
 * Doctor has told me it's no good for my health
 * To search for perfection is all very well
 * But to look for heaven is to live here in hell
 * Best wishes, Pdfpdf (talk) 11:21, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
 * ''P.S. I like your user page! Thanks for the chuckle. Pdfpdf (talk) 11:26, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

A page you started (Sidechain (ledger)) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Sidechain (ledger), Jhfrontz!

Wikipedia editor Whoisjohngalt just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Thanks for this addition."

To reply, leave a comment on Whoisjohngalt's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Whoisjohngalt (talk) 23:33, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Cybertropolis


The article Cybertropolis has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "I couldn't find evidence that this is a notable location (no reliable, independent sources, only military sources (directly or from suppliers)."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 15:33, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

Cybertropolis
Hey Jhfrontz. For the time being, I've taken the liberty of merging the contents of this article into the main article for Muscatatuck Urban Training Center. There's currently not really enough content on the main article to justify spinning off stand-alone articles for individual programs. I've personally trained at Muscatatuck quite a few times (god their food is awful), and there's certainly a lot of content that can be added to that page, which is probably where we should look to improve coverage for the time being, and then spin off stand-alone articles if the individual sections become to cumbersome to fit in the main article. G M G talk   16:19, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sidechain (ledger)


The article Sidechain (ledger) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "One source, and that's a crypto blog. No good candidates for redirection."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. David Gerard (talk) 15:39, 28 May 2019 (UTC)


 * I think the CoinDesk folks might take offense at being called a "crypto blog" (check out https://www.coindesk.com/about for other info about all of the media/events/tools they provide) but I'll happily add a bunch more references. --Jhfrontz (talk) 16:31, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Sidechain (ledger) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sidechain (ledger) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Sidechain (ledger) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. David Gerard (talk) 19:30, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Sidechain (ledger) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sidechain (ledger) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Sidechain (ledger)& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Guy (help!) 11:43, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)