User talk:Jksuresh

Copyvio
As far as I can see, your edits on Dharampal are a WP:COPYVIO - and you know it, given Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1115. Be carefull; a repetition of this may be sanctioned. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk!  20:08, 24 July 2021 (UTC)


 * I have provided a detailed response to Joanna. It will be good if you review the discussion on COPYRIGHT VIOLATION that you have referred to above (the Teahouse discussion) in light of my previous observations that I have given again here:
 * At this time, a quick glance at the copy violation tool's output (https://copyvios.toolforge.org/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&title=&oldid=1027012907&action=search&use_engine=1&use_links=1&turnitin=0) seems to indicate that the violations are classifiable into three types which I have described below.
 * Types of violations cited by the tool
 * (a)	commonly used phrases and clauses to describe a person. Examples:
 * (i)	“…thinker, historian and political philosopher”,
 * (ii)	”… of the cultural, scientific and technological achievements of Indian society on the eve of the British conquest”
 * (iii)	“Gandhiji’s call for Individual Satyagraha in October 1940”,
 * (iv)	“…At the time of Partition, he was put in charge of the Congress Socialist Party centre for the rehabilitation of refugees from West Pakistan, and came in close contact with Kamaladevi Chattopadhyaya and Ram Manohar Lohia, as well as with numer¬ous younger friends, such as L.C. Jain, in Delhi. He was also a founding member of the In¬dian Cooperative Union set up in 1948.”)
 * (b)	Excerpts from Dharampal’s works that are rephrased and therefore not placed within quotation marks. Examples:
 * (i)	“These schools were described as teaching a sophisticated curriculum, with daily school attendance by about 30% of children aged 6-15 years. Interestingly, the majority of students belonged to communities who were classed as Shudras or even lower. Further, in some areas, for instance in Kerala, Muslim girls were quite well represented.”
 * (ii)	The British Origin of Cow-Slaughter in India (2002),[ii] besides providing historical evidence about the genesis of mass cow-slaughter under British auspices, presents extensive documentary material about one of the most significant resistance movements in India against kine-killing by the British during the years 1880-1894.[iii] By highlighting the participation of prominent Muslims in this mass protest as well as by emphasizing the crucial fact that it was the British, and not the Muslims, who were the main consumers of beef, Dharampal is able to dispel one of the deep-seated myths perpetuated to reinforce divisive colonial strategies.[iv]
 * (c)	in respect of the list of published books. Example:
 * i.	1. Dharampal, Panchayat Raj as the Basis of Indian Polity: An Exploration into the Proceedings of the Constituent Assembly (with a foreword by Jayaprakash Narayan), AVARD, New Delhi, 1962; reprinted in: Dharampal, Collected Writings, Other India Press: Mapusa 2000 (reissued 2003 & 2007), vol. IV, pp. 1-95; also in Dharampal Classics Series, ed. J.K. Bajaj and M.D. Srinivas, Vol. 1, Rashtrotthana Sahitya: Bengaluru and Centre for Policy Studies: Chennai, 2021. Translations into Gujarati and Hindi in Dharampal Samagra Lekhan (11 vols.), ed. Indumati Katdare, Punarutthan Trust, Ahmedabad 2005 and 2007, respectively.
 * In summary, I would like you to review the actual content of the violations thrown up by the check-tool and let me know what next needs to be done. Jksuresh (talk) 20:48, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
 * I have reviewed this and my findings are at Talk:Dharampal— Diannaa (talk) 22:17, 24 July 2021 (UTC)