User talk:JoaoPillon

AfC notification: Draft:Capital Markets Union has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Capital Markets Union. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 18:26, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Capital Markets Union (March 24)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Capital Markets Union and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Capital Markets Union, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Capital_Markets_Union Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sulfurboy&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Capital_Markets_Union reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 21:33, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

Getting more attention to your AfC
It would be reasonable to leave a brief note in neutral terms at the talk pages of the EEMU and EBU pages inviting comment (at Talk:Economy of the European Union/Archive 2 for and against your proposal. --Red King (talk) 18:32, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Red King I thank you for your support and comment. I will do it. --JoaoPillon (talk) 18:37, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Capital Markets Union has been accepted
 Capital Markets Union, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Capital_Markets_Union help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Robert McClenon (talk) 19:46, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

Named references
Hi Joao, I can't find it now but I am certain that somewhere there is a guidance that says that named references of the style    are nowadays considered poor practice. I know we all follow existing examples and it looks like you have found an old one.

The preference now is to use reasonably meaningful names, so that other editors can read the raw text and see fairly easily which reference is which. If it is a long article, then it needs to anticipate the need for uniquenes. A short article might use    but a longer one would need    (quotes are only needed if the name contains a space or other special character). --Red King (talk) 21:50, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from European Union law into Draft:Freedom of Establishment and Freedom to Provide Services in the European Union. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 14:47, 28 June 2020 (UTC)