User talk:Joe Fogey

AfC notification: Draft:The Banks of Sweet Primroses has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:The Banks of Sweet Primroses. Thanks! SwisterTwister  talk  22:38, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Banks of Sweet Primroses has been accepted
 The Banks of Sweet Primroses, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Smmurphy(Talk) 17:54, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Your submission at Articles for creation: All Jolly Fellows that Follow the Plough has been accepted
 All Jolly Fellows that Follow the Plough, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! MatthewVanitas (talk) 23:07, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hares on the Mountain has been accepted
 Hares on the Mountain, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! MatthewVanitas (talk) 21:34, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Van Diemen's Land (folk song) has been accepted
 Van Diemen's Land (folk song), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! MatthewVanitas (talk) 01:49, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

February 2017
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:The Bold Fisherman, from its old location at User:Joe Fogey/The Bold Fisherman. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 03:13, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Transportation Ballads has been accepted
 Transportation Ballads, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! MatthewVanitas (talk) 02:55, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Miller's Three Sons has been accepted
 The Miller's Three Sons, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! SwisterTwister  talk  23:15, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Your submission at Articles for creation: When Jones' Ale was New has been accepted
 When Jones' Ale was New, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! SwisterTwister  talk  07:49, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

A page you started (Walter Pardon) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Walter Pardon, Joe Fogey!

Wikipedia editor Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Nice article. But some of those sources are not reliable; YouTube, etc. Suggest make more use of ODNB article, which is gold dust, rather than leave it languishing in the EL section where it can't do any good."

To reply, leave a comment on Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

O Fortuna! ...Imperatrix mundi.  14:17, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Thank you! ツ
Dear fellow editor; Thank you very much for adding an external link to the article on Matty Groves today, for Jean Ritchie's recording of the song for Alan Lomax in 1949. When you next visit the article, you will see that I have included this recording into the table, and also created a complete citation for it in the Notes column, so that the full citation now appears in the References section. With your permission, I would therefore like to remove the link you added into the External links section, unless you would prefer it stayed there instead of in the table, in which case, please feel free simply to revert/undo my latest edit. Thank you once again for contributing this interesting, historical recording of the song. With kind regards; Patrick. ツ Pdebee.(talk)(guestbook) 15:55, 3 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Hello, Patrick.


 * I'm not sure how to reply to your message, so please let me know if you've read this. I find some aspects of Wikipedia puzzling.


 * Thanks for your message and your comment. I don't mind you including the Jean Ritchie version in your table, though I think field recordings should be shown as distinct from commercial recordings - they are part of a different activity and serve a different purpose. Perhaps a separate table? I'll probably enter some other field recordings when I find them. I think too that it might be useful to other editors and to readers to draw attention to on-line archives such as the Cultural Equity resource and the British Library Sound Archive It seems barmy to me to list dozens of versions of a song on commercial recordings when the process of academic study of folk song is concerned with collected versions and field recordings.


 * All the best! Joe Fogey (talk) 20:41, 3 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Dear Joe,
 * Thank you for your reply, which I could see thanks to having entered my initial post, which automatically entered your talk page into my watchlist. So, when you posted your reply above, I could see it as a new edit. Also, you will notice that your reply is now indented, which I did by applying a single colon before each of your paragraphs; for my present reply, I am applying two colons, which will indent my text by one level again. This is explained in WP:THREAD.
 * I fully agree with your idea to have a separate section for field recordings, and I am therefore going to relocate the content of my recent edit there. When you have found more of them, then I can create a table for you if you wish; feel free to contact me when you're ready and we can synchronize our efforts at that time.
 * You make a cogent point about the distinction between field and commercial recordings, and our new section will accommodate the former with greater equanimity, and for the benefit of all our readers, whatever their level of interest.
 * I will update the present post in a minute, after creating the new section. ✅
 * With kind regards for now;
 * Patrick. ツ Pdebee.(talk)(guestbook) 21:28, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
 * PS: I will now copy the above exchange into the article's talk page, for accountability to other interested editors.
 * Patrick. ツ Pdebee.(talk)(guestbook) 21:41, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

OK, thanks, Patrick. Joe Fogey (talk) 21:57, 3 March 2017 (UTC)


 * It's all done, Joe. Now that we actually have the new section you proposed, do you still see the need for your original entry to stay in the 'External links' section? Or would you be happy to remove it, now that I also created a full citation for your source? Thank you, Joe.
 * With kind regards;
 * Patrick. ツ Pdebee.(talk)(guestbook) 22:15, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

Your help desk question
You have a response.— Vchimpanzee  •  talk  •  contributions  •  22:19, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

Offering assistance about 'Bare URLs'
Dear Joe, I took the liberty of converting your external link to the 'Broadside Ballads Online' search page, from a bare URL, as explained in Bare URLs, which I would suggest you take a few minutes to read, at your convenience. I can see you're adding more bare URLs in the prose itself, and I could convert these also. However, it's probably best if you learn how to do this yourself, using the same method I applied for the link for 'Broadside Ballads Online' a few minutes ago; it's an easy enough task and it really is best not to leave bare URLs in articles. I hope you didn't mind this piece of unsolicited advice too much, but I'll leave you in peace now. Please keep well, and thank you for your very interesting contributions on the subject. Let me know if I can help some more. With kind regards; Patrick. ツ Pdebee.(talk)(guestbook) 22:51, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

No worries, Patrick. Editing is a complicated process, clearly, and my intention is to improve things. I can use all the help I can get. Thanks for your help. Joe Fogey (talk) 23:01, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited William Taylor (folk song), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Broadsides and Voice of the People. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lady Isabel and the Elf Knight, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Roy Palmer. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:12, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Bold Fisherman has been accepted
 The Bold Fisherman, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Antonioatrylia (talk) 00:22, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Disambiguation link notification for March 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lady Isabel and the Elf Knight, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Peter Kennedy and Fred Jordan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:21, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (The Banks of Sweet Dundee) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating The Banks of Sweet Dundee, Joe Fogey!

Wikipedia editor Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Nice article -cheers!"

To reply, leave a comment on Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

&mdash; O Fortuna!   Imperatrix mundi.  11:13, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ralph Vaughan Williams, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Roy Palmer. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Sam Larner) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Sam Larner, Joe Fogey!

Wikipedia editor Elliot321 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Thank you for creating this article! In the future, please only capitalize the first word of headings unless they are proper nouns. Thanks!"

To reply, leave a comment on Elliot321's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Elliot321 (talk) 22:48, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)