User talk:JohnC

Hi John good to see you made it. Looks like you're finding your way round no problem. :) —Christiaan 08:43, 3 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Category:Wikipedians in New Zealand
Hi, You might want to consider adding User NZ res to the top of your user page, which will add you to this category automatically and also add a nice graphic. Onco_p53 00:27, 1 January 2006 (UTC)

Question
Hi John, please look at my question under Talk:Extraordinary rendition. Thanks. Kosebamse 07:27, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

Blue fly Tail
Hi - I was wondering if you could re-write that paragraph as I can't make heads or tails of it. If you could just say what it means in simple language. Thanks. -- Stbalbach 01:05, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

Regarding edits made during January 11 2007 (UTC) to War in Afghanistan (2001–present)
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. It seems most, if not all, of your edits tonight are highly POV. Please read Wikipedia's policies on neutral point of view and no original research.  Auburn Pilot talk 05:50, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

February 2009
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Terrillja talk  07:00, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Terrillja talk  07:13, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

WP:TERRORIST
Please read WP:TERRORIST. Wikipedia generally avoids using the word "terrorist" in the narrative voice unless attributing it to a source. Please don't add it to articles. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz 06:58, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

anti-semitism and anti-zionism
Hi John,

If I say antisemitism I mean antisemitism not anti-zionism. I have a great deal of personal experience of both and can make the distinction.

To suggest otherwise is patronising and offensive.

Telaviv1 (talk) 18:47, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

Surafend affair
Hi, re: your comment at Talk:Surafend affair, can you elaborate on which part(s) you consider to be POV? I'm happy to edit the article to remove any bias, but it's not clear from your statement what you consider non-neutral. I look forward to your feedback. Thanks, --Canley (talk) 06:49, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

Talk page questions
Hi, I removed your comments to the Peak oil talk page because they do not address improvement of the article or discussion of the sources (see wp:NOTFORUM). If you have questions, feel free to pose them to the reference desk. By the way, you seem to be conflating several different topics and concepts. Read the article if you're not sure exactly what "Peak oil" means. NJGW (talk) 06:39, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

Sign your posts
Please sign your posts to talk pages. You can do this by either typing four tildes (~) or clicking on the signature button above the edit box. --Steven J. Anderson (talk) 18:41, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Olga Stringfellow


The article Olga Stringfellow has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Ravendrop 10:03, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

Replied
Hello, JohnC. Just letting you know that I replied to your comment on the Pedophilia talk page. Flyer22 (talk) 10:19, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

Articles for Deletion
Hello John. As a courtesy I want to let you know that I have nominated John Cox (lawyer) for deletion because of concerns about Notability, Autobiographies, and so forth. Please don't take this as a personal slight -- I'm nominating the article solely for policy concerns. Thanks --Neutralitytalk 03:27, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

September 2011
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to White nationalism, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.   Greenman (talk) 22:07, 10 September 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add defamatory content, as you did at Talk:Katie Price, you may be blocked from editing. Off2riorob (talk) 20:57, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

Talk pages
Hi. I just removed 2 of your comments on Talk:Anita Bryant. Talk pages are not a place to engage in a discussion about politics, sexuality, or, really, anything else. Talk pages are to discuss improvements to the attached article. Per WP:FORUM and WP:SOAPBOX, off topic comments can and will be removed. There are thousands of places on the internet where you can get involved in arguments about homosexuality, politics, etc. Wikipedia is not one of them. Qwyrxian (talk) 05:27, 25 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Also, you need to sign every post you make on a talk page. You do this by typing four tildes, which will look like ~ . That will automatically add your name and time of posting, which is necessary to make threaded conversation possible. Qwyrxian (talk) 05:28, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

October 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia! I am glad to see you are interested in discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Irish Republican Army are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you.  RepublicanJacobite  TheFortyFive 21:16, 1 October 2011 (UTC)


 * And you're still doing it (which I warned you about last month), on Talk: Hung (TV series). Your behavior is beginning to cross over into disruptive territory, and could result in you being blocked.  You have to understand, Wikipedia is not a site for general discussion.  Find an online chat/politics/debate site, and leave your comments there.  Use Wikipedia talk pages only to discuss improvements to articles.  Qwyrxian (talk) 08:21, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

January 2012
Re: your recent deletions of sourced content, addition of unsourced opinion, and use of talk pages for commentary, it seems that the above suggestions and warnings are neither understood or heeded. I'll request administrative overview. 76.248.147.199 (talk) 14:41, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Notice of discussion at the Administrators' Noticeboard

 * Archived ANI thread: Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive735 --Chris (talk) 16:34, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. 76.248.147.199 (talk) 15:53, 3 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Consider this a one and only warning. Read Wikipedia's policy on verification. Do not remove sourced content (as here ) without going at once to the article talkpage to explain why it was a good idea.  Do not add unsourced content. Especially, do not add unsourced content to articles about living people. Wikipedia is not the thought police - editors are entitled to whatever views they hold.  However, editing against basic policy and with the apparent aim of advancing one point of view is likely to result in sanctions. --Elen of the Roads (talk) 01:29, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

One unblock request is sufficient
Please pick one and remove the other or remove both and post another.  Tide  rolls  12:38, 8 July 2012 (UTC)