User talk:JohnLockeSwanStation

Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions because it appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.

Speedy deletion nomination of Time Tracking Software: Livetecs.com


A tag has been placed on Time Tracking Software: Livetecs.com, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. B figura (talk) 01:07, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Regarding Speedy Deletion


 * Hello, JohnLockeSwanStation. Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia-- the world's largest free content encyclopedia.
 * I'm sorry, but this has been deleted as meeting one or more of the Categories for Speedy Deletion. 
 * Generally, articles are speedily deleted when there is no assertion of significance or they fall into things to avoid or what Wikipedia is not.


 * Wikipedia is an encyclopedia-- subjects must meet notability guidelines with reliable sources providing verifiable information. That generally means someone unconnected with the subject needs to have written about the subject. 
 * Sometimes articles are deleted because they contain content copyrighted elsewhere . Such content can be used as a source of information, but the content here must be completely rewritten from scratch.
 * Some articles contain material written in a promotional tone. These must often be written from scratch. They are vigorously deleted.
 * Any content that is negative in tone and unsourced or which is disparaging will also be vigorously deleted.
 * Any deficiencies with notability, sourcing, or things to avoid should be remedied before reposting as they can lead to repeated deletions.
 * For test edits, click JohnLockeSwanStation/sandbox


 * If you want to try again, please use the Article Wizard to guide you through the creation process.

 CONTENT IN ARTICLES NEEDS TO BE RELIABLY SOURCED.  Dloh cierekim  01:45, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Hi there
I'm currently sitting on the new pages feed, and I saw a few of your articles pop up. Out of sheer curiosity, what motivates you to write two articles about obscure football figures and two articles (overly promotional, in my opinion) article about companies in the span of half an hour? Best, B figura  (talk) 01:39, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
 * @Bfigura-- I too was wondering about that. Dloh cierekim  01:46, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of M Models and Talent Agency


A tag has been placed on M Models and Talent Agency requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.prlog.org/12247544-spot-light-on-models-and-talent-agency-toronto.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. B figura (talk) 01:42, 4 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Regarding Speedy Deletion


 * Hello, JohnLockeSwanStation. Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia-- the world's largest free content encyclopedia.
 * I'm sorry, but this has been deleted as meeting one or more of the Categories for Speedy Deletion. 
 * Generally, articles are speedily deleted when there is no assertion of significance or they fall into <BIG>things to avoid</BIG> or <BIG>what Wikipedia is not.</BIG>


 * Wikipedia is an encyclopedia-- subjects must meet <BIG>notability guidelines</BIG> with <BIG>reliable sources</BIG> providing<BIG> verifiable information.</BIG> That generally means someone unconnected with the subject needs to have written about the subject. 
 * Sometimes articles are deleted because they contain content copyrighted elsewhere . Such content can be used as a source of information, but the content here must be completely rewritten from scratch.
 * Some articles contain material written in a promotional tone. These must often be written from scratch. They are vigorously deleted.
 * Any content that is negative in tone and unsourced or which is disparaging will also be vigorously deleted.
 * Any deficiencies with notability, sourcing, or things to avoid should be remedied before reposting as they can lead to repeated deletions.
 * For test edits, click JohnLockeSwanStation/sandbox


 * If you want to try again, please use the Article Wizard to guide you through the creation process.

<CENTER> CONTENT IN ARTICLES NEEDS TO BE RELIABLY SOURCED. </CENTER> Dloh cierekim  03:30, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Elisabet Gunnarsdottir
Hello, JohnLockeSwanStation. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Elisabet Gunnarsdottir, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Elisabet Gunnarsdottir to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, MrScorch6200 (talk) 03:17, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Sourcing is needed for this article
Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia. Articles on Wikipedia need to do the following:
 * They must show that the subject meets the relevant notability guideline. Please see the guideline Notability.
 * The content of articles must be supported with significant verifiable information from reliable, 3rd party sources not connected with the subject. If you could just list the sources for what we have, it would be a good start. You can use the links below to find sources.


 * If the article is deleted, you may want to use the Article Wizard to recreate the article once you have gathered enough content and sourcing.
 * Starting an article can help you.

CONTENT IN ARTICLES NEEDS TO BE RELIABLY SOURCED. </CENTER> Dloh cierekim  03:30, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

A thousand pardons
I briefly blocked you thinking you were User:WikiTourists. The article history seemed to show this account picking up where the last one left off. My humblest apologies. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 12:49, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

A kitten for you!
I'm sorry.

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 12:53, 9 January 2014 (UTC) <br style="clear: both;"/>

Proposed deletion of AdSpruce


The article AdSpruce has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * notability, advert, references

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RJFJR (talk) 15:21, 16 February 2015 (UTC)