User talk:Johnfreez

Welcome to the Wikipedia
Here are some links I find useful


 * Policy Library
 * Cite your sources
 * Verifiability
 * Wikiquette
 * Conflict resolution
 * Brilliant prose
 * Neutral point of view
 * Pages needing attention
 * Peer review
 * Bad jokes and other deleted nonsense
 * Village pump
 * Boilerplate text

Feel free to ask me anything the links and talk pages don't answer. You can sign your name by typing 4 tildes, likes this: ~.

Cheers, Sam [Spade] 04:36, 21 May 2004 (UTC)

Hi! You want to clean up Pipe cleaner if you don't want it to be deleted. The current content there isn't an encyclopedic article. Thue | talk 20:30, 3 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * I didn't want it to be deleted, however, it is at this time *already* deleted. Why wasn't I given a chance at a revision?  I did list a "pipe cleaner" method.  Is there any way to recover what I added?  I can't remember fully what was there now. Johnfreez 23:57, 3 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * The content was
 * Yeah, a pipe cleaner cleans pipes. Amazing!


 * As far as glass smoking pipes are concerned, I've heard (well actually, I read it) that saturating the peice in rubbing alcohol and some salt works well, though I have yet to try it. My pipe needs it though.
 * Which I guess was deleted (I didn't do it) because it doesn't really try to be in encyclopedic style. Thue | talk 11:41, 5 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the clarification. I'll try to create something more... official next time I guess. ;) Johnfreez 23:57, 5 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Platial logo enWP.gif
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Platial logo enWP.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 08:12, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Platial logo enWP.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:Platial logo enWP.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 07:28, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Brightstar logo.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Brightstar logo.png. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 15:38, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 23
Hi. When you recently edited Colocasia esculenta, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Esculenta (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:03, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for File:Five element star circle note.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Five element star circle note.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like (to release all rights),  (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * File copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 07:46, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Victor Weisskopf, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Maxim. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

By whom tags
Hi, just a quick note on your recent use of "by whom" tags on two Ukraine war-related articles. The "by whom" tag is intended for unattributed opinions in the text, not for passive sentences missing an agent. For example, if I were to resolve the "by whom" tag in the following sentence: "Johny Briggs is reported to have been appointed manager of Carlisle United.", I would write "The Guardian reported that Johny Briggs was appointed manager of Carlisle United", NOT "Johnny Briggs is reported to have been appointed as manager of Carlisle United by the Carlisle United Board of Directors."

In the cases you highlighted, the agent was "by the Russian authorities", as stated in the source. In that case, you could simply add the agent yourself without tagging. Boynamedsue (talk) 10:09, 25 April 2022 (UTC)


 * so to restate, the "by whom" tag asks for source clarification, not for a missing actor of a phrase in passive voice, got it .. i had read the style guide, but it-went-in-one-ear-and-out-the-other .. thanks for the clarification @Boynamedsue .. Johnfreez (talk) 12:25, 25 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Glad to help! Yes, that's right, "by whom" exists to avoid stuff like "Many experts believe..." and "It is thought that...". Don't worry about it, btw, you are far from the only person to make the mistake. All the best. Boynamedsue (talk) 13:10, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

December 2022
This is not an appropriate edit summary for something that does not follow consensus. Mellk (talk) 16:09, 27 December 2022 (UTC)


 * Looks like you are still doing this. This is against the consensus. If you continue, it may lead to a block. Mellk (talk) 07:47, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics
Mellk (talk) 07:48, 24 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Please also be aware of WP:HOUNDING. I don't need you tracking my edits and leaving comments on every warning I give (especially if they are months old). The last time I interacted with you was weeks ago, so this behavior is abnormal. This is my last warning. Mellk (talk) 06:27, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Note regarding contentious topics
You have recently made edits related to the Arab–Israeli conflict. This is a standard message to inform you that the Arab–Israeli conflict is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Contentious topics. — Red-tailed hawk  (nest) 06:20, 13 January 2024 (UTC)