User talk:JordanKSM



 
 * Put new text under old text.
 * Sign your posts by typing four tildes.
 * New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.
 * Assume good faith
 * Be polite and avoid personal attacks
 * Be welcoming to newcomers
 * Seek dispute resolution if needed

Your removal of text at Chinese people in Myanmar


Here you removed 46,000 bytes of text from the article with the edit summary 'Removed jingoist edits'. You've repeated this removal a number of times. An editor reported you to ANI but no action has yet been taken. Such removals need discussion and agreement among editors. Be aware that if this happens again you are risking a block. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 19:41, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
 * . That's not "removal". There's an edit in February that restores old COPYVIO content that has not been accepted by the community. Did you even read the section? It's all about how the Chinese are superior. That's why so many users have removed it. JordanKSM (talk) 21:41, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
 * I've explained more at the talk page.JordanKSM (talk) 22:48, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

Edit warring at Chinese people in Myanmar
 You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. since you continued to revert after my above warning. If I read the talk page at Talk:Chinese people in Myanmar there is no evident consensus for your view. We expect that editors will follow the steps of WP:Dispute resolution when disagreements occur, instead of trying to force their views into the article by reverting. EdJohnston (talk) 02:20, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
 * A previous complaint about your edits of this article can be seen at this ANI link. EdJohnston (talk) 02:22, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
 * WTF is wrong with you? Can you read what I write on the talk page! Or are you in cahoot with CCP? JordanKSM (talk) 14:11, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Your ANI was created by the Chinese user. Did the edition added by indef-blocked User:Backendgaming have consensus? The Chinese love to play the game. JordanKSM (talk) 14:14, 27 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Dominated by egoist admins who love to kick others around & paid CCP editors. The project is hopeless. JordanKSM (talk) 14:16, 27 July 2022 (UTC)


 * It's sure your users are in cahoots. Using back-channel communication to mass revert. JordanKSM (talk) 14:26, 27 July 2022 (UTC)


 * I won't revert it anymore. It's so ugly and speaks for itself. But I will re-add the KMT invasion that was removed by User:Yue without consensus. JordanKSM (talk) 15:13, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Here, your user is using a nonexistent source to push POV. It's established at WP:ANI and WP:Dispute Resolution#Summary_of_dispute_by_Stress_theorist. JordanKSM (talk) 14:49, 27 July 2022 (UTC)


 * I want to to see his views on this matter. JordanKSM (talk) 14:53, 27 July 2022 (UTC)


 * In case you aren't aware, other users have raised their concerns on the talk page of User:SimeonManier. The concerns regarding the section have been raised so many times. It doesn't matter if it's 46k or whatever. It's a duplicate of similar sections at "Chinese in X" articles with only minor changes for the country. JordanKSM (talk) 14:14, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

What attack? Have you seen a user indef-blocked for a rude reply? Which policy do you have? Isn't it an abuse of power? JordanKSM (talk) 19:35, 28 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Take a look at User_talk:SimeonManier and how he attacked others who pointed out his racist edits. JordanKSM (talk) 18:04, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

JordanKSM (talk) 19:24, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
 * So, I don't care if you edited and altered your edits afterwards, but the fact is you made these extremely racist edits and attacks. And you can delete edits you don't like from your talk page all you want, but everyone can see them in the history and it's all quite clear. Canterbury Tail talk 20:05, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
 * It's an emotional reaction to the block. I reverted it immediately. After the reverts, I didn't realize someone would see it, much less use it to my detriment. I apologize for those edits. That's a mistake on my part. I should have just taken a break for two days. But the problem was I strongly believed I was not doing anything wrong. I am okay with people want to keep that 47k of content. Few would be persuaded by the massive paragraphs and thingly veiled racial undertones. JordanKSM (talk) 20:13, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

Block
Anyway, I am okay with the block. I am okay with the stage of the articles as they currently stand. I won't appeal so long as no one massively alters or introduces fake content to important articles with high veiwership (Aung San, Myanmar, Ne Win, etc.). Aung San's article is poorly watched. So, there's just one problem. Many articles about famous Burmese people have a history of Chinese users claiming that person as Chinese. Such claims and rumors originating from Wikipedia have real-life consequences. JordanKSM (talk) 20:31, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts&#32;as a sockpuppet of &#32;per the evidence presented at Sockpuppet investigations/SSH remoteserver. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Girth Summit  (blether) 15:38, 9 August 2022 (UTC)