User talk:Josephkugelmass

Talkback
Lhb1239 (talk) 23:05, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

October 2011
Your recent edits seem to have the appearance of edit warring&#32; after a review of the reverts you have made on Article. Users are expected to collaborate and discuss with others and avoid editing disruptively. Please be particularly aware, the three-revert rule states that: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.Because there is an open discussion on the article's talk page (Hart of Dixie), WP:BRD needs to be adhered to. Please do not revert the article back and please do not edit war. If necessary, an WP:RFC may need to be called for and/or WP:CONSENSUS Lhb1239 (talk) 01:11, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or  located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 01:11, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

Result of your 3RR complaint
Hello Josephkugelmass. Please see the result of WP:AN3. Try to reach agreement on the talk page. Until you find at least one person to support your changes, any further reverts may lead to blocks. EdJohnston (talk) 02:11, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Lhb1239 has expressed surprise that you chose to file at WP:NPOVN. There is a further discussion at User talk:EdJohnston. If you express no interest at all in negotiation with other editors who want to work on the article that attitude may be held against you. Filing at NPOVN has the air of forum shopping, since you were asked to seek consensus after you filed at WP:AN3. The normal place to solve a content dispute is the article talk page. You moved from one place (AN3) where you charged Lhb1239 with abuse, to a new place where you are making a similar charge. There is a risk that admins will lose patience with your behavior. EdJohnston (talk) 03:54, 31 October 2011 (UTC)