User talk:Jroehl

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on. Again, welcome! Per Ardua (talk) 16:32, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Problems with upload of File:List of countries by past military expenditure2.PNG
Thanks for uploading File:List of countries by past military expenditure2.PNG. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:05, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:List of countries by past military expenditure.PNG
Thanks for uploading File:List of countries by past military expenditure.PNG. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:05, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:List of countries by past military expenditure2.PNG
Thank you for uploading File:List of countries by past military expenditure2.PNG. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is [ a list of your uploads].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:25, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Responding to Msg, Prefer Internal Wikipedia Communication
Not sure if I'm the correct recipient for your message, yet I'll help if I can. Attempting to respect the ~anon and archival nature of Wikipedia by continuing conversation here. If you really prefer PM then we can continue that way.

From looking at your work it appears to be heavily involved with the concept of time, events, dates, and the proliferation that easy publishing has had on the creation of big data in places like Wikipedia. The work seems interesting, I just have no reference to what you're talking about, or what your specific proposal was. Perhaps you have me switched with a different user?

As a side note, did you know your work is being referenced by Darpa, Facebook, and the University of Melbourne? Araesmojo (talk) 19:28, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

I am not sure what this is referring to?

Is this about the post I placed on the proposals section yesterday?

I am not sure about the nature of the "~anon" reference. I am not interested in hiding anything.

Thanks Jeff Roehl Jroehl (talk) 21:12, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

I love that bubble diagram of the worlds languages. It is the highest use of Tableau.

Jroehl (talk) 21:35, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

And the website I was refering to is:

Timelinesinhistory.com

Jroehl (talk) 21:57, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

November 2020
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 00:06, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

PA
This https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Parler#User_GorillaWarfare_Twitter_Troll is a PA and a violation of out policies.Slatersteven (talk) 09:46, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

Lay of the invective's and wp:soapboxing.Slatersteven (talk) 14:07, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

This is now a warning, not a request. If you do not stop soapboxing and making PA's against other editors I will report you.Slatersteven (talk) 09:47, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

This is now a final warning, stop casting aspersions or accusing fellow editors of political bias, do so again and I will report you.Slatersteven (talk) 10:55, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

Important notice
GorillaWarfare (talk) 03:33, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

Parler has an RFC
Parler has an RFC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Notifying all editors who participated in the informal discussion about removing the term. GorillaWarfare (talk) 20:12, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

PA's
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Slatersteven (talk) 15:31, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

November 2020
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like you to assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not do on Talk:Parler. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.  Heart  (talk) 15:38, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

What, specifically, are you accusing me of? Jroehl (talk) 15:57, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
 * This is my last word about this series of incidents, I suggest you drop this. Read our polices on wp:npa] and [[wp:soapboxing]Slatersteven (talk) 16:01, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
 * , hello, I am warning you of not using good faith about other editors on a talk page.  Heart  (talk) 16:10, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

>>YouSaid>> This is my last word about this series of incidents

Thank you! Have a nice weekend!

>>YouSaid>> I suggest you drop this.

And I wonder what the other 7 billion people on the planet earth might suggest.

I suggest that calling several million people anti Jewish soapboxing. Isn't hate speech, by definition, "soapboxing"?

Jroehl (talk) 16:17, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

February 2021
This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, as you did at Talk:Gab (social network), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people.  Acroterion   (talk)   21:59, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Came here to make this exact comment but I was distracted and now here we are.--Jorm (talk) 22:10, 14 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Cool story, bro. --Guy Macon (talk) 05:05, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
 * , You don't have to talk to me, Guy. You don't have to follow me everywhere and try to provoke me. I'm flattered that I seem to live in your head rent free. I'm not sure what you get out of following me around, but I hope it gives you pleasure. Jorm (talk) 05:44, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
 * "Cool story, bro" is great! Especially when mocking cancer survivors.
 * You should be super happy whenever you get one, considering the joy you have spread far and wide with the phrase so far: (I have another 50 diffs if anyone wants to see them) --Guy Macon (talk) 07:51, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
 * , whatever makes you happy, pal. Jorm (talk) 08:02, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
 * ❄️📖,🙎‍♂️! --Guy Macon (talk) 17:27, 16 February 2021 (UTC)


 * You may wish to see the final warning Jroehl already received for making these exact same types of allegations against me back in November (see this nonsense at Talk:Parler). GorillaWarfare (talk) 22:53, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
 * I considered just blocking, perhaps I'm being too lenient.  Acroterion   (talk)   23:25, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Not my decision to make, but them continuing to cast aspersions against me that I've already explained to them can be easily proven false is growing pretty tired. GorillaWarfare (talk) 23:35, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for making personal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.  Acroterion   (talk)   03:41, 15 February 2021 (UTC)


 * If anything like this recurs, the next will be permanent.  Acroterion   (talk)   03:42, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Drmies (talk) 03:48, 15 February 2021 (UTC)


 * , I hate coming after you like this, but this edit, and this, that's more than enough for an indefinite block, IMO. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 03:50, 15 February 2021 (UTC)


 * That's fine, given those diffs indef is the right call.   Acroterion   (talk)   03:54, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

After contributing to Wikipedia for many years. You are blocking me permanently?

Who do I appeal to?

Jroehl (talk) 17:14, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Are you requesting that I denounce my sincerely held beliefs? Beliefs shared by many millions?

Can I quote you on that?

Is there a neutral administrator at Wikipedia I can talk to?

Jroehl (talk) 18:32, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
 * You are free to make a new unblock request and another administrator will review it. You are free to believe what you want. You are not free to use Wikipedia to push your conspiracy theories. You are especially not free to attack other editors to further your conspiracy theory. WP:RIGHTGREATWRONGS is on point here. This is the last I'll say here. Again, you are free to make a new unblock request and I'd be prohibited from reviewing it. --Yamla (talk) 18:50, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Yamla,

Thanks for getting back to me.

>>YouSaid>> You are not free to use Wikipedia to push your conspiracy theories.

1) Did you just attack me by characterizing me as a purveyor of a fringe conspiracy theory? 2) What "theory" are you accusing me of purveying? 3) Do you still want me to provide you with a robust rejection (swear an oath?) against an un-named theory that arguably 1/2 of humanity may hold?

Thanks Jeff

Jroehl (talk) 20:35, 16 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Everything is documented at Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1051. The good news (for you) is that now the Wikipedia has (because of your behavior) blocked you from editing, there is another place where your fringe conspiracy theories will be welcome. Perhaps you have heard of it. They call it "Parler". Be careful though; Parler will kick you off if you attack other users the way you have here. Or has Parler already banned you? --Guy Macon (talk) 21:05, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

1) I did not attack anybody. 2) I guess if you are a conservative (and half the country still is), it is ok to be banned from Wikipedia.

I did not know this.

Jroehl (talk) 22:12, 16 February 2021 (UTC)


 * You were blocked indefinitely for personal attacks, as has been repeatedly explained to you. If you aren't willing to acknowledge this conduct, there is nothing more to be said here.  Acroterion   (talk)   22:14, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

I do not see how speculating that somebody may have an ulterior motive for repeatedly violating NPOV is a personal attack. And I did apologize for that, though.

I have been contributing to Wikipedia for years. And a lot more than your databases will reveal.

I had an administrator demand a "robust rejection of those conspiracy theories". I don't even know what he is talking about. Would you like some sort of religious conversion also?

Is there some rational, mature adults that I can communicate with?

Jroehl (talk) 22:27, 16 February 2021 (UTC)


 * I've removed talkpage access, since you're just repeating the personal attacks that resulted in the block. I see no likelihood that anything will change.  Acroterion   (talk)   22:53, 16 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Apologies for commenting after TPA has been revoked, as I normally avoid doing so, but I am doing so here simply because it may be useful in some future appeal. Jroehl, several people have already mentioned the Wikipedia principle which describes "how speculating that somebody may have an ulterior motive for repeatedly violating NPOV is a personal attack". If you have not read it, I'd recommend you do so: Casting aspersions. Specifically note: An editor must not accuse another of misbehavior without evidence, especially when the accusations are repeated or severe. This especially applies to accusations of being paid by a company to promote a point of view (i.e., a shill) or similar associations and using that to attack or cast doubt over the editor in content disputes. If accusations must be made, they should be raised, with evidence, at appropriate forums such as the user talk page, WP:COIN, or other appropriate places per WP:COI. GorillaWarfare (talk) 22:57, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.  Acroterion   (talk)   22:55, 16 February 2021 (UTC)