User talk:Jtalledo/Archive 5

Orphaned non-free media (File:Magic Sword.png)
Thanks for uploading File:Magic Sword.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:22, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Cynthia Cooper
Hey, sorry about that. I should have checked for the wiki rules on that first. I appreciate you posting it for me this time though. Thanks! Nickv1025 (talk) 00:14, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Wnba logo.png)
 Thanks for uploading Image:Wnba logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Kalel2007 (talk) 20:04, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of List of active drive-in theaters
I have nominated List of active drive-in theaters, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/List of active drive-in theaters. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Many otters • One hammer • HELP) 17:38, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

Invitation
Hello, I noticed you've made edits to University of the Philippines (UP) and UP–related articles and thought you might want to support our recent proposal to create the WikiProject University of the Philippines. We've recently revamped the proposal and started a drive to push the approval of this project. We have a lot of articles that may be under this project and we would like assistance and support for its approval. Hope we'll have a very positive response. Go Fighting Maroons!

P.S. You can look at the preliminary drafts of the project in here. Thanks! -- The Wandering Traveler WIKIPROJECT UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES NEEDS YOUR SUPPORT!  06:27, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

You reverted me
When you reverted my edit on the Gilmore Girls, I just want to say that if you watch ABC Family that they have picked the show up, now, if you do this to someones edit, one of the administrators may block you   M  eteor  Man  7228  19:21, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm rather confused — both you and Meteorman are talking about you reverting his edits, but he's never edited the page. Is he one or more of the IPs that you keep having to revert?  I should note: I was the admin to whom he "reported" you.  No complaints from me about your edits :-)  Nyttend (talk) 04:26, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

Carried away
Thanks and I'm sorry for this and if you need any help, im your guy   M  eteor  Man  7228  03:38, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

Bein bold
I've been being bold lately and ive created my first article as part of an adoption task   M  eteor  Man  7228  05:02, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

Vandalism
There was this article that was vandalised. What should i do?  M  eteor  Man  7228  01:45, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Remember
The article that had been vandalised. it turns out, that it was an IP User and that all his edits were like Vandalism, Profanity, and on one article, he even put explicit advertising (Which by the way, no one bothered to even report) so thats why i reported him so, thank you for your help ,oh and all four of his edits were reverted --  M  eteor  Man  7228  03:11, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

Cookie


The Second Coming of The Cookie Monster has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

Warrior Within and voluptuous buttocks
Hello and thanks for removing that nonsense from Prince of Persia: Warrior Within. I had seen that, but I was laughing too hard to do the right thing. And that's an adorable card on your user page. Also, I'd like to talk about the use of this image, which was not part of the vandalism. I added it a couple of weeks ago.

You mentioned that a shot of someone's backside is not proof of maturity but rather the opposite, and you're absolutely right. I don't know if you've played the games, so: The Sands of Time had a charming Arabian Nights storybook quality and really strong characterization. Not to mention that the female protagonist was only reasonably endowed and the game managed to make stroking another's head an act of intimacy instead of jumping into the sexpool of modern entertainment. I'd give it to my ten-year-old cousin, if I had one and if I thought that he could hack the platforming. Warrior Within is one of the most blatant cases of Darker And Edgier, a process where a franchise courts larger sales by adding blood, swears and titties. The palette is largely a mix of grey and brown, the Prince smolders with generic rage, the loading screen is a waterfall of blood and the music for classical period Middle East is provided by the heavy metal band Godsmack. The whole mess is clinched in the introduction, where the female antagonist is introduced by a six-second shot of what you see in the image. In the rain.

This change in aesthetics should definitely be noted in the article, and I find the image a good way of doing it. It sums up the more-maturity-through-less-maturity design in a way that we're unlikely to match through text, at least while maintaining neutrality and verifiability, and it establishes that for crying out loud Wikipedia wasn't kidding. This is not to deny that I find having a butt in the article hilarious. It still has good reason to be there.

If you agree, there's one thing I've struggled with: the caption. I don't want to be unfair to the game's authors, but judging from your removal, it should be clearer. Do you think that "The introduction demonstrates the maturity level of Warrior Within" would work?

(Caution: do not open other links behind that external link. The site is more addictive than we are.) --Kiz o r  07:32, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

Contemporary Examples of Film Montages
Per Jtalledo, the list of Contemporary examples of movie montages does not belong in the article: "Removing uncited list - Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information"

I think the article would be improved with specific examples of montages, especially given the fact that it states that they're overused. Secondly, Wikipedia does have occasional articles with long lists of examples (e.g. Fictional representations of Romani people). If it doesn't belong in the main article, then perhaps a new page, (examples of montages) should be created.Tkellner (talk) 22:37, 12 October 2009 (UTC)