User talk:Jvcdude/Archive1

Image tagging for Image:Tschetter.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Tschetter.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 02:10, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Holes-3.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Holes-3.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 04:07, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of James Valley Christain School[edit]

A tag has been placed on James Valley Christain School requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Paste (talk) 19:28, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Northwestern energy logo.jpg}[edit]

Thank you for uploading Image:Northwestern energy logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 14:26, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Northwestern energy logo.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Northwestern energy logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 09:41, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

July 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to KELO-TV has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Gary King (talk) 01:59, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Animaniacs_Presidents.JPG[edit]

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Animaniacs_Presidents.JPG. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Melesse (talk) 23:52, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Worlds of Fun[edit]

Thanks for contributing to the Worlds of Fun/Patriot page! You seem pretty new to wikipedia, so let me say Welcome. Moonraker0022 (talk) 03:09, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of National Treasure 3[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, National Treasure 3, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Treasure 3. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? - CobaltBlueTony™ _talk 16:14, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User page[edit]

If you are writing in 3rd person, shouldn't "I currently live around Huron, SD and am 18 yrs old, a high school graduate currently in college" be "Drew or Jvcdude currently lives...."? HAHA, just felt the need to point that out :) CTJF83Talk 02:11, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ship names[edit]

Thanks for your work on our ship infoboxes, but I'm going to have to ask you to go back through each one and italicize the names as here on wikipedia we italicize the names of ships. To do this you can do this: USS ''Abraham Lincoln''. It would also be nice if you could use an edit summary with your edits. -MBK₀₀₄ 02:10, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please take heed of this. Continuing to disregard our Guidelines can result in a willful violation of our Manual of Style which can lead to a block (loss of editing privileges). -MBK₀₀₄ 02:20, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join WikiProject Ships[edit]

Hello Jvcdude! I noticed your contributions to a ship article, and thought you might be interested in WikiProject Ships, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of ships of all kinds.

If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks and related articles. Thanks! -MBK₀₀₄ 02:40, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

doland article[edit]

Could you take a look at this article? The sentence about the sport co-op seems confusing to me. thanks. Mseliw (talk) 02:47, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Huron, South Dakota Mayor[edit]

I noticed you recently added "(R)" to Mayor David McGirr in the Huron, South Dakota. I'm also a South Dakotan, and I believe the majority of city elections in the state are officially non-partisan. I cannot find a verifiable or reliable source that indicates a party affiliation for Mr. McGirr. Rather than removing your edit, I thought I'd check with you first, in case you do have such a source. If not, we will probably have to delete the (R) from the infobox.DCmacnut <> 03:55, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of NorthWestern Corporation[edit]

A tag has been placed on NorthWestern Corporation requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. — KieferSkunk (talk) — 17:12, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:AOL Time Warner WB.JPG[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:AOL Time Warner WB.JPG. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 14:25, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:Survivor Logo.jpg)[edit]

You've uploaded File:Survivor Logo.jpg, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:18, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:Survivor-logo2008-06-11-1213195366.jpg)[edit]

You've uploaded File:Survivor-logo2008-06-11-1213195366.jpg, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:18, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Huron Regional Medical Center[edit]

A tag has been placed on Huron Regional Medical Center, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

copyvio of http://www.huronregional.org/about/

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Orlady (talk) 21:34, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Tom Kenny at 2009 KCA.jpg[edit]

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Tom Kenny at 2009 KCA.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Polly (Parrot) 14:37, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

61st Primetime Emmys[edit]

If your goal is to be the first one to post the winning result, stop. Please format it correctly. You're not impressing anybody by simply bolding the winner first. Gage (talk) 00:27, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please ignore Gage's egregious people skills. WP:AGF. Grsz¹¹ 00:28, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CIVIL. Gage (talk) 00:29, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Again, please stop only bolding the nominee. Please follow the established format of updating this and past articles involving the Emmys. I've tried multiple times now to update the article with the proper format, and have had to face the Edit Conflict page, simply because of your refusal to do what should be just as easy as what you are currently and repeatedly adding to the article. Gage (talk) 00:47, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you continue to ignore me? Gage (talk) 01:16, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Looney-Tunes-Spotlight-Collection-Volume-4.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Looney-Tunes-Spotlight-Collection-Volume-4.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 21:46, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Looney-Tunes-Spotlight-Collection-Volume-6.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Looney-Tunes-Spotlight-Collection-Volume-6.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 21:46, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Looney-Tunes-Spotlight-Collection-Volume-7.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Looney-Tunes-Spotlight-Collection-Volume-7.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 21:47, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of James Valley Christian School[edit]

Hello! Your submission of James Valley Christian School at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Bencherlite ^Talk 08:08, 2 November 2009 (UTC) After someone (ie me) had added a referenced fact to an article it is useful to note why you deleted it - (including the reference). Victuallers (talk) 09:19, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]