User talk:Kailash29792/Archive 1

Happy new year!
Thanks, wish you the same.~Hope we make more achievements this year. Kailash29792 (talk) 14:28, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Wish u the same :) Have a wonderful editing period ahead! &mdash; Commander (Ping me) 16:40, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Archive
please archive your talk page. see wp:ARCHIVE and User:Cluebot III for more, or ask help--  Ð ℬig XЯaɣ  12:52, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
 * If you are too lazy to do that, you can even delete content from your talk page as and when you like as long as you follow WP:REMOVED. That's what I do. Secret of success (talk)  14:31, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

Re:fact
Hey Kailash. As I predicted long time ago, these so-called bilingual productions will trouble us a lot. I had taken this issue to the Indian cinema task force and started discussion, not many were bothered to take part there. Those very few who replied there, have all told that creating articles for every version is generally unpreferred, so you see it's not a personal agenda and there is no bias towards any particular film. A bilingual film, that is basically one film, the same film, made in two languages. So there'll be existing two articles for one film, is that needed? Moreover, an article that duplicates another existing article may get speedily deleted. I repeat what I told another editor before: If there are not considerable changes in the cast, crew, the story or the script, I absolutely don't seen any need to create a separate article for the same film. There have been a couple of exemptions such as the ones you mentioned, mainly because the lead cast of those films have been different; in the case of Vinnaithaandi Varuvaaya/Ye Maaya Chesave, the stories were even slightly different. However films like 180, Dhoni, Payanam/Gaganam and Naan E/Eega too, do not need two articles, because there are no notable differences between both versions. Vishwaroopam does have one article only (until now), rightly so! Abhiyum Naanum's Telugu version Aakasamantha had an article until some time ago, it was redirected then. All films get the same treatment, therefore I will definitely redirect Gaganam to its main article too very soon and maybe even Naan E. The same applies to Yen Endral Kadhal Enben (which is probably more a dubbed film than an entirely remade film anyway.) As I said, other experienced editors have voiced the same opinion and so far, nobody could make a convincing point why separate articles for the same film should exist. So thats's the answer to your question! Have a nice day! :) Johannes003 (talk) 19:00, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

thuppakki box office report beats even srk's jab tak hai jaan please add this in thuppakki article c source below
http://truthdive.com/2012/11/14/box-office-report-thuppakki-beats-jab-tak-hai-jaan-sos-and-podaa-podi-in-tn.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.164.215.216 (talk) 14:30, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

thuppaki first day collection thuppakki from sify
http://www.sify.com/movies/thuppakki-takes-extraordinary-opening-news-tamil-mlpjLRidigd.html 122.164.43.217 (talk) 15:26, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

the telugu dubbed version snehitudu is not a flop please help
someone has mentioned snehitudu has a failed at the boxoffice and also overall break even in the Indian boxoffice section by adding unreliable sources please remove those sentences along with those unreliable sources it spoils the look of the article here are the reliable sources such as hindu and times of india which states snehitudu is a hit http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2012-02-17/news-interviews/31070519_1_telugu-films-release  http://www.thehindu.com/arts/cinema/article2840296.ece    please add these sources and remove those unreliable sources 122.164.208.48 (talk) 07:46, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

Karnan GA review
Hi Kailash, I have reviewed the article. Please refer to Karnan GA for review comments. All the best. Ssriram mt (talk) 02:06, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Hi, can you look at removing all direct copy-paste from references for all places leaving quotations. Also try to avoid undue things like "fit physique", which are irrelevant. I will put it on hold for a period of one week and leave it for your rework. I will decide next week. Ssriram mt (talk) 14:04, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Hi Kailash - think you are almost there. Lead and box office remain - comments in Karnan GA.Ssriram mt (talk) 00:26, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Just came across this - please add from this - Karnan book sourcesSsriram mt (talk) 01:23, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Sorry, i completely missed your talk. Have checked it and made minor modifications. Ssriram mt (talk) 02:03, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Kamal Haasan GAR
While taking GAs for reassessment you should mention your points stating why it does not meet the criteria. I suggest you to open the GAR page and state your concerns. Otherwise, close it &mdash; Vensatry (Ping me)  06:51, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
 * You're still not done with the process. Click the "follow this link" to create a sub page where you can list down your concerns and once you're done with it, save the page. Please go through WP:GA/R for a better idea and follow the instructions, and contact me if you're still not clear with it. &mdash; Vensatry (Ping me)  06:29, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Same thing for Thuppakki PR too. &mdash; Vensatry (Ping me)  08:55, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Parasakthi
Hi Kailash - i see most of the peer review comments have been addressed by you. Just a few I think you can go for GA nom, if that was the original idea.Ssriram mt (talk) 22:42, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
 * link congress party
 * dmk expansion in the first instance
 * reference to list of songs?
 * rephrase -"Parasakthi was released on 17 October 1952, coinciding with Diwali day," to "was released on Diwali" - point is it is not coincidental, but planned release. Most big movies release on Diwali even now.
 * "nicknamed a "silver jubilee" hit." - is it not a common term for all movies running well.
 * try to maintain tense uniformly in running text, esp in plot.
 * You can close the pr if you wish to, I am not ale to give it a full read at present.--Dwaipayan (talk) 17:54, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

An interesting thing to tell you
I now really agree that IMDb is an unreliable source. My sister was going through the Parents Guide section of both Man of Steel and Wreck-It Ralph. Our mouths fell open by seeing this : IN INDIA WRECK-IT RALPH AND MAN OF STEEL ARE CERTIFIED U/A AND A RESPECTIVLEY. Proof: this and this. Can you even believe this? as every other Indian sources and reviews say that it was U and U/A! I know its a stupid thing to tell, but this perfectly classifies why IMDb is an unreliable source.Plea$ant 1623 ✉  14:49, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
 * No, no, you didn't got me. Man of Steel was A and Wreck-It Ralph was U/A.Plea$ant 1623 ✉  14:58, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Yeah, but it is also Superman's most violent outing yet. All films in the original Superman series are rated U (even the mostly-forgettable Superman Returns).Plea$ant 1623 ✉  15:10, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Mughal-e-Azam color
I don't know if it's correct or not. That guy has been fighting this issue for a long time. He wants me to send him an email etc., but I don't want to. I provided a link to the color version credits on his user page. Don't know if he saw it or not. I am tired of fighting with these people. Can you read both versions and figure it out? Also see the discussion at User talk:Shaku india. BollyJeff &#124;  talk  21:48, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

Dear Kailash and others,

Everyone may have a different view on the matter. It is better that we all resolve it. The same would be in the interest of Wikipedia as well as in the interest of Mughal-e-Azam, a film that all of us love.

I suggest that we talk an authority on this issue and get it vetted and verified by him. What do you say ?

Regards, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shaku india (talk • contribs) 07:32, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

Parasakthi (1952 film)
The problem is that a well-intentioned new editor is messing up Good Article reviews. His completed reviews are far from acceptable. SL93 (talk) 21:32, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

I've reviewed it Kailash, just some very minor points, I've made most of the minor changes myself.♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld  12:56, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

Don't worry about it, it isn't important for GA! Congrats on an excellent piece of work given the industry and age of the film! ♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld  17:19, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

Chennai Express
Hi Kailash. I added Tamil to the languages spoken in the movie Chennai Express, but User:AniceMathew removed it by constituting it is not included in the censor certificate (see my user talk). What does he mean? Hoerestimmen (talk) 21:50, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
-- Sriram Vikram (talk) 13:47, 3 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Regarding your edit at Anegan, I believe epaper versions are much better. You can see the article as it appeared in newspapers. Also, you can choose to see it in normal mode by using 'Quick View' in the link. -- Sriram Vikram (talk) 16:31, 3 September 2013 (UTC)


 * When the same content is available on normal version of the site, please avoid using epaper urls as they die much sooner. If it is mandatory to use epaper link, please archive using WebCite, ArchiveIt or other such services. Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 18:09, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

Sriram
Your work on Karnan was terrific. By the way, a column appears every Sunday in The Hindu called 'Blast from the past' by a film historian named randor guy. Its about the classic movies of the 60s and 70s. If possible, can you use those materials for your work on old tamil films? And most of these movies don't even have an article in wiki. If these pages were created, I would also pitch in with more info and references. Thank You. -- Sriram Vikram (talk) 08:59, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
 * That's what I was trying to say. If the articles already exists, it becomes easier to develop. But most of these movies don't even have an article. If you can create such articles, even if it was just stubs, we can work in tandem and develop them. -- Sriram Vikram (talk) 09:30, 8 September 2013 (UTC)


 * I am not looking for anything in particular. Just felt that the column can be used as a source of primary information for creating the article which can be developed later by others. If those were the articles created based on the column, I'll try what I can to find more info about them and update those articles periodically. -- Sriram Vikram (talk) 10:06, 8 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Okay. Coz we never know for which article, info will be available. So can't commit you on any article in particular. But will do my best. If possible, keep me updated about the articles you create using the column as a source. You may add it to the list you provided above. -- Sriram Vikram (talk) 10:22, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

I created an article based on one of those columns, Nenjil Or Aalayam. But a BOT tagged the article with copyright infringement or something. Take a look and try to correct it. I don't what I'm supposed to do. -- Sriram Vikram (talk) 19:48, 8 September 2013 (UTC)


 * So does that mean if I rewrite it, I can remove the tags or am I supposed to wait for some admin to take a call? -- Sriram Vikram (talk) 04:18, 9 September 2013 (UTC)


 * How about this image?  -- Sriram Vikram (talk) 07:01, 9 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Since you mentioned Iru Sahodarargal in the list, how about this? -- Sriram Vikram (talk) 07:20, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Yeah. Saw the image you have uploaded for Nenjil.. I just felt this image could be better. -- Sriram Vikram (talk) 07:40, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Btw, is the Iru Sagodharargal image free? I mean, the movie came in 1936. So the copyright should have expired. Can I upload it to commons? -- Sriram Vikram (talk) 07:44, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
 * But if the copyright has expired, why not upload it in commons? -- Sriram Vikram (talk) 08:14, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for your wishes. Btw, about your image for Parasakthi, the movie came on 1952. So I suggest you upload the image from that photobucket account of yours to commons. -- Sriram Vikram (talk) 16:17, 11 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Thanks mate. I have created a list of articles by Randor Guy in his page and using it like a check list. Creating and editing articles by latest first. Hope you can help me with finding more references like books.. -- Sriram Vikram (talk) 06:16, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Dude! there is another upcoming movie called 'Iravum Pagalum' thats why disam. -- Sriram Vikram (talk) 07:18, 18 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Check this Ananya_(actress) -- Sriram Vikram (talk) 07:21, 18 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Reliable sources  -- Sriram Vikram (talk) 07:24, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Hey! In Chandralekha (1948 film), the image in infobox reads Chandra Lekha instead of Chandralekha. Should there be a space in the title?-- Sriram Vikram (talk) 14:06, 18 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Hey pal! Regarding the Blast from the Past (column), Randor Guy isn't the only one doing it. He's just the one in charge of the tamil films. There are other guys who make those columns in other language films. For ex: Suresh Kolhi in New Delhi for hindi films. Take a look at these... Randor Guy for Tamil, ] Vijay Lokapally for Hindi,  Narasimham for Telugu,  Vijayakumar for Malayalam,  again Hindi but Suresh Kolhi,  again Hindi but Ziya us salam. etc. I think there are many more particularly for Hindi because lot of states speak Hindi. -- Sriram Vikram (talk) 15:01, 19 September 2013 (UTC)


 * I can't get you. Do you mean you want me to add those movies too to the list? I just informed you because when so many people are working on the column, it is not appropriate to attribute it to just one guy. Actually that was the reason why I added the list to Randor Guy's page instead of creating a new page. I think now that a new page has been created, its better to add other guys names too. But if some wikipedian starts adding those other language movies to the list, then it will become difficult to maintain. -- Sriram Vikram (talk) 15:36, 19 September 2013 (UTC)


 * By the way, I'm just changing the heading of this section for both of us to navigate easily as there is another section titled 'Request'. -- Sriram Vikram (talk) 15:48, 19 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Sounds good. Lets have a general article that exists now. It will list all those people working on that column from where they can navigate to each language. And those articles can hold the info abt the list of films. -- Sriram Vikram (talk) 15:53, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Hey! why aren't there any reviews yet? Does the review process usually take this long? There are not even any comments. Are we supposed to wait for him or can we ask someone else to take over? -- Sriram Vikram (talk) 07:29, 22 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Yeah! Saw your post in his talk page. But he hasn't replied yet. So, no use in me contacting him. I got some work to do in my real life. But trying to make myself available for the review. Its getting delayed here. Can I request in the teahouse for someone else to do the review? Is there any such procedure, if the first reviewer is on a break? -- Sriram Vikram (talk) 07:40, 22 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Okay. Thanks. -- Sriram Vikram (talk) 08:01, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Hey! Fix that Thalapathi poster edit warring. By the way, your undo din't work. It still shows the other image. Just tell that Onam guy that the other image has site logo. -- Sriram Vikram (talk) 06:55, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Hey! I was expecting you to make the changes to the Blast from the Past (column) page. When I created a partial list in Randor Guy's page, I knew it would get deleted soon. I still did it so that I can retrieve the older revision and use it as a check list for creating new articles for the lost film series. By the way, I'm a Vikram fanatic as you might have already knew from my user name! So, I'm gonna be a little busy with articles of his films. I'll be joining you pretty soon with the classic films. -- Sriram speak up  13:55, 27 September 2013 (UTC)


 * One more thing. When you upload movie posters, I suggest you upload reduced size because most of your posters gets reduced by Theo's Little Bot and the older versions gets deleted with time. Which means that, though you upload the posters, you won't be getting the credits unless someone pulls up the revision history for the images. Or you can upload two images- one of the actual size and the second of lower size. This will confuse the bot. (Did I just say that!!) Check this File:Idharkuthane Aasaipattai Balakumara Poster.jpg. So that even if the larger image gets deleted, the file will still have your name. -- Sriram speak up  13:55, 27 September 2013 (UTC)


 * But I din't mean that. I was talking about the different languages the columns appear in. And as I already said, I did not expect the table to stay. I just searched for the column in The Hindu and added them as they appeared. Its still sortable. But if you want to arrange them by decades, I think you can copy the table to an excel file and sort with the year. Don't know if that will actually work. -- Sriram speak up  14:34, 27 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Hello again. I have sorted the column by year and for films of same year, with their names. Regards. -- Sriram speak up  17:02, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

Hey! This article appeared in today's paper. Take a look. It could be useful. — Sriram speak up  04:42, 1 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Ha ha! What a coincidence!! No, its not me. My birth name is Sriram Narayanan. I just added Vikram coz I'm a Vikram fanatic. By the way, I think you can add it to Parasakthi. In the legacy section. -- Sriram speak up  04:57, 1 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Also, why doesn't the infobox have the editor name and National Pictures? -- Sriram speak up  05:03, 1 October 2013 (UTC)


 * As for me, I use studio when it actually means so. That is, the film was shot at a film studio; a physical structure. And I use distributor for one who has a production house. Not a place where sets are erected for film making. -- Sriram speak up  05:25, 1 October 2013 (UTC)


 * And the link doesn't even mention AVM Productions; just AVM Studios. So the studio is AVM and distributor is National Pictures. -- Sriram speak up  05:27, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Moodu Pani
Hi, good work with the article. In the article it's been mentioned that Balu Mahendra dubbed for Pratap Pothan. Are you sure about it? the voice of Pratap in the film no way resembles to Balu's actual voice (Bhanu Chander) in this video. &mdash; Vensatry (Ping me)  09:12, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Help
Can you translate p. 33 of this document into English? &mdash; Vensatry (Ping me)  12:08, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

Chandralekha GAN
Hey mate! Happy to know you have nominated Chandralekha for GA. Great work man. The article looks awesome. Wish you good luck. Keep rocking. -- Sriram speak up  16:22, 7 October 2013 (UTC)


 * The film was screened as part of the Centenary Film Festival held at the Siri Fort Auditorium in celebration of 100 years of Indian Cinema. The film festival was organised jointly by the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting in association with the National Film Archive of India. -- Sriram speak up  16:38, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Archiving mate.
Needs archiving. Sohambanerjee1998  09:20, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
 * More details here - Help:Archiving a talk page, User:MiszaBot/Archive HowTo or you can do it manually like me. Sohambanerjee1998  10:01, 10 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Manual method -


 * 1) Create a page like User talk:Kailash29792/Archive and so on.
 * 2) Create a seach box like this -
 * 3) Done!

Sohambanerjee1998  10:01, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Hitting the backspace - Deletion, Archiving chunks for easy navigability - Archiving. Eg. of Manual archiving - My talk page.  <font colour="white" face="segoe script">Sohambanerjee1998  12:13, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Is my talk page font visible?  <font colour="white" face="segoe script">Sohambanerjee1998  12:18, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
 * For completeness, if you wish, you could copy the content removed with edits such as the following to User talk:Kailash29792/Archive 1, etc.
 * 08:12, 9 December 2012
 * 04:49, 13 February 2013
 * 05:15, 13 February 2013
 * 18:41, 6 October 2013
 * 10:22, 10 October 2013
 * 12:39, 10 October 2013
 * (I may have missed some - you'll know better than me.) -- Trevj (talk) 13:08, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
 * PS You could try placing help me here if you'd like someone to walk you through it... although TBH it'd be a bit of an undertaking because you've selectively retained some sections while removing others. -- Trevj (talk) 13:09, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Chandralekha (1948 film)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Chandralekha (1948 film) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of 1ST7 -- 00:51, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Chandralekha (1948 film)
The article Chandralekha (1948 film) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Chandralekha (1948 film) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of 1ST7 -- 07:01, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Chandralekha (1948 film)
The article Chandralekha (1948 film) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Chandralekha (1948 film) for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of 1ST7 -- 03:42, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

2015 Indian Film Alone
I was wondering if you could please create a page for it — Preceding unsigned comment added by Indian editor television (talk • contribs) 18:16, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note that the above request was posted by a sockpuppet evading their block; and before acting on the request, due consideration should be given to whether or not one wants to be affiliated with such activities. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  20:22, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
 * User:Josve05a/Alone is where a different editor is working on it. Other non-socking editors are welcome to join. All socks are not welcome anywhere on wikipedia for any purpose whatsoever. DMacks (talk) 20:35, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Purampokku Poster
Hello dear Kailash. The poster currently uploaded for Purampokku is a fan made poster. Official poster from the producers have not yet been released. We may need to change when we have the official poster. Hope that is fine. Thanks ahead. Arun Rajagopalan (talk) 15:39, 21 July 2014 (UTC)


 * I believe your claims that the poster is fan-made. But when the official comes out, can you upload it here? Kailash29792 (talk) 15:44, 21 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Sure. Thank you. Arun Rajagopalan (talk) 12:22, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

User:Evano1van/MissingTamilFilms
Hope you are doing fine. You may be interested in this. Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 10:59, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
 * @Evano1van Under 2013, I have fixed Ethiri En 3, Kalavadiya Pozhuthugal, Muriyadi and Veeram. The rest doesn't seem to have an article in enwiki. Btw, Yohan never took off. So, I don't think it should have an article in the tamil wiki. Hope you can take care of it and update your userpage too. Thanks. Regards. -- Sriram speak up  14:39, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks Sriram fixing. Yes, I will report incorrect ones once I finish with interwiki links. Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 10:13, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

Mullum Malarum
Hi, you are doing a commendable job by expanding the article. This book might be helpful. Also you could take some of these articles to WP:DYK, an interesting project in wiki, which I think you might be aware of. If you need any help in this regard ping me. &mdash; Vensatry <sub style="color:indigo;">(Ping me)  16:28, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

Brother, I don't really know much about that. Did you write all that in the article? Thanks dude. I love Mahendran's films, this, Uthiripookkal (my favorite) and Johnny, and I so wanted to expand the articles but I could not find much. I think you have done a brilliant job, for me it looks great and I can't tell if it's all right or whether it needs to be edited. Good luck, hope you can improve the other articles too. Veera Dheera Sooran (talk) 18:13, 25 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Hi, Balu Mahendra in his blog shares his experience working in the film. Might be helpful. &mdash; Vensatry <sub style="color:indigo;">(Ping me)  13:50, 14 December 2013 (UTC)


 * the best u can do is translate the most useful trivia of Mullum Malarum and paste it here. &#45;--- Kailash29792 (talk) 15:24, 14 December 2013 (UTC)


 * I'll develop that in my sandbox. Meanwhile, you can also edit. &mdash; Vensatry <sub style="color:indigo;">(Ping me)  16:31, 14 December 2013 (UTC)


 * In the development section, you've included an image of the crew members. I think the reviewers might question you on adding this non-free image in addition to the poster. It could have been okay if you had included the image of Jayalakshmi and Shoba as they are no more (also there's a strong contrast between the two characters') . &mdash; Vensatry <sub style="color:indigo;">(Ping me)  07:55, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

Here is the original link for Vikatan review. Only a preview in shown though for non subscribers! -- Sriram speak up  18:23, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Btw, the Thina Thanthi review is also avl in ref 34 in the article. I suggesr you use it instead of the rajnifans link. -- Sriram speak up  18:29, 6 January 2014 (UTC)


 * , I cannot find "தந்தி" in ref 34, which is this Kailash29792 (talk) 03:27, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
 * It can only mean that the rajnifans link could have wrongly mentioned the review to be from Thinathanthi. After translating the reviews, I was checking the article if they have been already used. That is when I stumbled upon ref 34 whose contents are exactly the same as in the rajnifans link under thinathanthi review. -- Sriram speak up  09:10, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
 * You haven't used the link for Vikatan review. The Dhananjayan book doesn't have a preview in google books. So, I suggest you use this link. I'm afraid the rajnifans link could be of problem when the GA review happens. Its my opinion; you decide. -- Sriram speak up  11:49, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
 * This link that you have posted in the talk page says the film was dubbed and released in Russia. -- Sriram speak up  03:13, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Can't we just mention that it was dubbed and released in Russia? An encyclopaedia is supposed to be encyclopaedic. Whatever info is available, put it in there. -- Sriram speak up  03:29, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Have you checked this out yet? The book..? -- Sriram speak up  01:01, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
 * I saw the reference in the article. I was asking about the book. Will let you know if I find the book or get to know where to buy one. -- Sriram speak up  02:35, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
 * FYI, if you are in Chennai: The Chennai Book fair is currently happening at the YMCA, Nandanam. Great place for finding film related books. I will be going in a day or two. -- Sriram speak up  02:40, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Something for you. -- Sriram speak up  17:40, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Director Shankar says "I entered with dreams of directing films such as `Mullum Malarum.'" Here Think it can be added somewhere? -- Sriram speak up  14:54, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Well, the article is your work. I leave it to you to decide whether it is worth mentioning. -- Sriram speak up  15:02, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Since I felt the sentence was too long, I have rephrased it a little. But, feel free to revert it if you aren't satisfied. -- Sriram speak up  00:47, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

Conversations with Mani Ratnam

 * Hi, do you have the physical copy of the book? &mdash; Vensatry <sub style="color:indigo;">(Ping me)  07:47, 26 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Yes, I have a hardcover of Conversations with Mani Ratnam at home. However, I am at work and I will back home only by around 6 or 7pm. BTW, what is the book needed for? &#45;--- Kailash29792 (talk) 07:52, 26 November 2013 (UTC)


 * That'll be handy to take Mani Ratnam to FAC in the future. Also could you fill those missing awards in this page. &mdash; Vensatry <sub style="color:indigo;">(Ping me)  07:55, 26 November 2013 (UTC)


 * @User:Vensatry, I'll do the best I can after coming home. BTW, the book has a free preview on Google Books. Try that, or u can buy the book online for around ₹400 (less expensive that the physical purchase). &#45;--- Kailash29792 (talk) 08:03, 26 November 2013 (UTC)


 * It has only limited preview. Just expand the awards won by him when you get time. &mdash; Vensatry <sub style="color:indigo;">(Ping me)  08:10, 26 November 2013 (UTC)