User talk:Kapitan110295

Talkback
Wes  Mᴥuse  11:52, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

WikiProject Eurovision Newsletter - Issue 39
This newsletter was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk), on behalf of 23:39, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Earlier Eurovision by Year articles
Hi Kapitan,

I noticed you updated the returning artists section on ESC 1998. There was an exercise approx 2 years ago where I was rolling out the new layout style on annual Eurovision articles, the returning artists section was being moved towards the top of articles and in written prose (rather than table) format. I managed to get through to, and  ( onwards were already in the new style). However, I was unable to complete the task due to my volunteering at London 2012. And thus the articles from to  were left unfinished. If you wish to assist the project in completing the task whilst you're undergoing maintenance work, then you are more than welcome to do so. This is the skeleton template based on the layout change agreed back in May 2012. Wes  Mᴥuse  05:34, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

WikiProject Eurovision Newsletter - Issue 40
This newsletter was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk), on behalf of 09:51, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

WikiProject Eurovision - consensus discussion
There is a discussion regarding colour coding on articles taking place on the project talk page that requires input from as many project members as possible. Thank you, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:16, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

12 point table debate
I've closed the debate for 12 point tables at WT:ESC. It seems those tables are not allowed whatsoever. It's a complexed issue with WP:NOTSTATSBOOK and WP:TRIVIA, with no loop-hole that would allows use to get out of it. Listing 12 points only, means we're leaving out the other point trends, which would mean we'd have to show every point given from 1 - 12. And we can't do that as we'd end up violating WP:NOTSTATSBOOK by having excessive tables of statistics. Leaving 12-points on their own makes it trivial statistics. So we've been left with no other option but to delete them all. I felt disheartened because it took me an hour just to do that example on the talk page. And I feel more sorry for Karlwhen who created them all in the first place. Although saying that, he was told a while back not to go ahead and create them, until we knew of a loop-hole. Anyhow, I've left him a note so he is aware of the reasons why they're removed.

Apparently the flagicons that were used on the hosting's section of country articles were also a violation of WP:ICONDECORATION, and we were told to remove them also. All these policies are now making me extra cautious. What else have we implemented that could be violating a manual of style policy!? I dread to know. Wouldn't surprise me if we get told next that we're limited on how many colour-codes we're suppose to use. And they say this is an encyclopaedia, and that we are welcomed to look at ways to improve it. Apparently not! I'm off to have a sulk. Wes  Mᴥuse  11:10, 3 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Oh heck, there is a policy on colour. See WP:COLOUR.  I give up!  We try our best to improve things, and then there's some poxy policy that prevents us from doing our best.   Wes   Mᴥuse  11:21, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
 * I saw that, and I was annoyed as you. I got the sense, without being too judgmental that the people you contacted probably don't watch a lot of Eurovision, or if they do have pretty clear views on it. The definition of "trivia" is highly debatable, but since receiving 12 points from a country means that they regard your song as the best in the contest, I would hardly call it "trivial". And as I said, voting trends are amongst the most talked about part of the contest, and those tables are easy ways of giving a basic knowledge of what trends existed. I've been thinking of saving the data or the tables anyway, not just so I can use it personally from time-to-time (I study a bit on the contest), but also because opinions may change in the future once the pages expand.
 * Thanks for all your work and investigating, Wes, it was good we got the bottom of that :). Kapitan110295 (talk) 11:53, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
 * You know there is a way around it. Although not on Wikipedia, of course.  Have you heard of Wikia?  It's a similar site to Wikipedia, created by Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales.  The exception to Wikia is there are no strict policies, and users are allowed to create pages to store statistics etc.  So we'd be able to re-create Eurovision material on there (without sources) and show voting trends.  And if people were to google up for voting trends, then the Wikia site would show top of the google list.  Here's the website, if you wish to investigate it further.   Wes   Mᴥuse  13:04, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

Invitation to Adelaide Wikipedia Users Group meetings
Hi, in case you're not already aware of it, a group of Adelaide Wikipedians has been meeting on a monthly basis since April, with the aim of improving the scope and quality of articles on South Australian topics. We meet at UniSA's City West campus, and our 23 July meeting will have a guest speaker from the National Trust of SA.

This coming Sunday, 6 July, we will be holding our first Edit-a-thon. This will be an opportunity for new editors to come and learn either basic or more advanced editing from very experienced wikipedians, so if you know anyone who would like to get some practice, please let them know - and beginners will be very welcome. Cheers, Bahudhara (talk) 05:04, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

WikiProject Eurovision Newsletter - Issue 41
This newsletter was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk), on behalf of 15:49, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

WikiProject Eurovision Newsletter - Issue 42
This newsletter was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk), on behalf of 08:37, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

WikiProject Eurovision Newsletter - Issue 43
This newsletter was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk), on behalf of 13:05, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

WikiProject Eurovision - Urgent Message
Dear Project Eurovision Member,

There is a serious discussion been created at the WikiProject Eurovision talk page that requires utmost attention from all, or as many members as possible, as this could bear a huge impact on the project as a whole. Please click here to read the discussion, and participate peacefully. Thank you. This message was delivered at 04:41, 23 November 2014 (UTC) by MediaWiki message delivery (talk), on behalf of Project Eurovision Newsdesk

WikiProject Eurovision Newsletter - Issue 44
This newsletter was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk), on behalf of 18:12, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

WikiProject Eurovision Newsletter - Issue 45
This newsletter was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk), on behalf of WikiProject Eurovision at 11:26, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

WikiProject Eurovision Cup - March 2015
This notice was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk), on behalf of WikiProject Eurovision at 16:17, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

WikiProject Eurovision Newsletter - Issue 46
This newsletter was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk), on behalf of WikiProject Eurovision 10:12, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

WikiProject Eurovision Cup - April 2015
This notice was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk), on behalf of WikiProject Eurovision at 10:07, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

WikiProject Eurovision Cup news
This notice was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk), on behalf of WikiProject Eurovision at 13:57, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

WikiProject Eurovision Newsletter - Issue 47
This newsletter was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk), on behalf of WikiProject Eurovision 16:24, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:24, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Ernie Awards
I removed part of your addition to the Ernie Awards article, because it appeared to be copied directly from the source. — Diannaa (talk) 21:19, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Esc2017 listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Esc2017. Since you had some involvement with the Esc2017 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. – Davey 2010 Talk 18:39, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

Esc2001 listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Esc2001. Since you had some involvement with the Esc2001 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. – Davey 2010 Talk 18:36, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Esc2003 listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Esc2003. Since you had some involvement with the Esc2003 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. – Davey 2010 Talk 18:39, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

WikiProject Eurovision: Important Announcement
This notice was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk), on behalf of WikiProject Eurovision at 21:33, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:16TeamBracket-Compact-Tennis3555-Byes
Template:16TeamBracket-Compact-Tennis3555-Byes has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 14:30, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

Episode summaries
Hello, I've once again reverted your lengthy episode summaries at Australian Survivor (season 4). As I explained the first time, WP:TVPLOT makes clear that these type of episode summaries should not be lengthy, regardless of the episode's runtime. To quote, "...plot summaries of no more than 200 words per episode..." and all versions of the summaries you wrote well exceeded this limit. The first episode's summary as written, for example, clocks in at 195 words. Thus, there isn't room to add. Summaries are just that - summaries - not a blow-by-blow description of everything that happened in the episode. -- Whats new?(talk) 00:31, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
 * (Response copied from my talk page to keep discussion in one place) I must ask why you haven't deleted the summaries made for Australian Survivor (season 3)? They are consistent with those made for the US version - the summary written for the last episode alone is more than 500 words, and the summary of the first ever episode is more than 300. All I was trying to do was make the page of the latest season of Australian Survivor consistent to all the others, at the moment it looks ugly and incomplete. If you're unhappy with the summaries maybe we should remove the Episodes subheading altogether. And also I would hardly call what I wrote a blow-by-blow analysis of the episode, it completely conforms with every other plot summary written for the Survivor episodes. Kapitan110295 (talk) 01:13, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
 * I was unaware of the length of summaries at the season 3 article. I don't cast my eye over every article all the time! In any case, the MOS at WP:TVPLOT is clear. There will always be examples where some wriggle room is given, but the summaries as they stand on the season 4 page are perfectly fine - my objection was to your additions which clocked in at 635 words for episode 1 - more than triple both the limit and existing text. Just because OTHER STUFF EXISTS is not rationale for violating guidelines in this article. -- Whats new?(talk) 02:22, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:16TeamRR-2Group
Template:16TeamRR-2Group has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Hhkohh (talk) 15:31, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:12TeamRR-2Group
Template:12TeamRR-2Group has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Hhkohh (talk) 16:09, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:11TeamRR-2Group56
Template:11TeamRR-2Group56 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Hhkohh (talk) 16:09, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:9TeamRR-2Group54
Template:9TeamRR-2Group54 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Hhkohh (talk) 16:09, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:5TeamRR-2Group
Template:5TeamRR-2Group has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Hhkohh (talk) 16:09, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:3TeamRR-2Group
Template:3TeamRR-2Group has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Hhkohh (talk) 16:09, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:5TeamRR-1Group
Template:5TeamRR-1Group has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Hhkohh (talk) 15:18, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:7TeamRR
Template:7TeamRR has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Hhkohh (talk) 15:21, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:One Nation (Australia)/meta/color
Template:One Nation (Australia)/meta/color has been nominated for merging with Template:Pauline Hanson's One Nation/meta/color. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Heyitsstevo (talk) 06:09, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:One Nation (Australia)/meta/shortname
Template:One Nation (Australia)/meta/shortname has been nominated for merging with Template:Pauline Hanson's One Nation/meta/shortname. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Heyitsstevo (talk) 06:09, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

Eurovision Newsletter for June 2019

 * Sent by ZLEA via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:04, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:3RoundBracket-2Byes
Template:3RoundBracket-2Byes has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 17:37, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Australian Senators/kap
Template:Australian Senators/kap has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:35, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:2RoundBracket-Byes
Template:2RoundBracket-Byes has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Pbrks (t • c) 18:14, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:12TeamBracket-2Round
Template:12TeamBracket-2Round has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. –Aidan721 (talk) 01:40, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

Category:Sport in Santa Tecla, El Salvador has been nominated for merging
Category:Sport in Santa Tecla, El Salvador has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –Aidan721 (talk) 17:42, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

Category:Sport in La Libertad, La Libertad has been nominated for merging
Category:Sport in La Libertad, La Libertad has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –Aidan721 (talk) 17:43, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

Memo
Ktkvtsh  (talk)  05:28, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

WikiProject Eurovision Newsletter Issue 49
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:53, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

WikiProject Eurovision Newsletter Issue 50
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:03, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

CfD nomination at
A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at  on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –Aidan721 (talk) 15:22, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

PicturePerfect666 (talk) 23:28, 21 May 2024 (UTC)