User talk:Kay girl 97

Hi Kay Girl.

I’m Lisa Lambe. I’m writing a note- please excuse my format I realise this page isn’t a blank one but I wanted to reach out. I’m very keen to rejuvenate my wiki page and I think you are a moderator of the page? My official website is new and I want to request that you and the wiki team for Lisa Lambe liaise with me and my record label to update the site to say and read as I would like there is a lot of out of date information and things I feel are too personal. It’s hugely important we are all cohesive.

Can you contact me via email ?

Many thanks. Lisa Lambe  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:BB6:2328:E258:6081:9246:91C8:FCFA (talk) 00:42, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

Olivia Jade Recentism tag
Hi - I undid your removal of the Recentism tag on Olivia Jade since it's the subject of an active RfC. However, please do feel free to leave a comment or !vote in that RfC. Chetsford (talk) 04:43, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

April 2019
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Tara McNeill, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.  General Ization Talk  01:42, 12 April 2019 (UTC)

November 2019
This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, as you did at User talk:213.113.121.42, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 04:51, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

Nina Dobrev
You may want to keep an increased eye on this article, as IP editors (likely the same one) keep reverting her middle name to the previous one, ignoring your Talk page posts on the subject. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 06:31, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Amaury • 04:11, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for File:Celtic Woman Magic of Christmas.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Celtic Woman Magic of Christmas.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like (to release all rights),  (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * File copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 21:45, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Celtic Woman Magic of Christmas.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Celtic Woman Magic of Christmas.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:01, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

Lisa Lambe
Hello you reported that I put stuff that was an advertisement on the page. Everything posted came from her website, record label and magazine interviews that were cited in the articles. Nothing was advertised can you be more specific?

October 2020
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Chloë Agnew, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 21:47, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

It wasn't posted by Chloe so it's not "self published. Kay girl 97 (talk) 22:36, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
 * , Facebook posts are all self-published by the person who posted them. On Wikipedia, if we expect to use a self-published post, it cannot make claims about third parties, which is what is happening here with the post you cite. We need to exclude it until there is an actual reliable secondary source with her DOB. Elizium23 (talk) 23:01, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

February 2021
Hello, I'm Rodney Araujo. I noticed that you recently removed content from Billions (TV series) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.   Rodney Araujo Tell me - My contributions  17:55, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Discussion invitation: Nina Dobrev
Coconutyou3 (talk) 13:57, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

Reminder: Discussion invitation (Nina Dobrev)
Coconutyou3 (talk) 15:16, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

== There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. ==

--Coconutyou3 (talk) 09:05, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Daniela Ruah
what is psychiatric about saying that Daniela Ruah is also Portuguese. Like it or not, she has dual nationality. FC Porto6185 (talk) 07:54, 29 May 2024 (UTC)

Reverted edit
Hi Kay girl 97, I have reverted your edit on Nina Dobrev's article. There is no Wikipedia policy (that I am aware of, so please correct me if I'm wrong) that says her citizenship should be omitted from the infobox, regardless of whether it is mentioned in the body or not. In fact, everything in the infobox should ideally be mentioned in the body and cited there, but the sole fact that it is present in the body does not stop it from being included in the infobox. I am open to discussing this, but please refrain from reverting it again, as I would have to start an edit warring report. Anthony Whitaker (talk) 19:44, 5 July 2024 (UTC)


 * That’s fine, but keep it as “Canadian” only in the lead. Consensus over the years agreed that Dobrev got her notability primarily in Canada. Kay girl 97 (talk) 01:29, 6 July 2024 (UTC)