User talk:Keithdyer101

An extended welcome
Welcome to Wikipedia. I've added a welcome message to the top of this page that gives a great deal of information about Wikipedia. I hope you find it useful.

Additionally, I hope you don't mind if I share some of my thoughts on starting out as a new editor on Wikipedia: If I could get editors in your situation to follow just one piece of advice, it would be this: Learn Wikipedia by working only on non-contentious topics until you have a feel for the normal editing process and the policies that usually come up when editing casually. You'll find editing to be fun, easy, and rewarding. The rare disputes are resolved quickly and easily.

Working on biographical information about living persons is far more difficult. Wikipedia's Biographies of living persons policy requires strict adherence to multiple content policies, and applies to all information about living persons including talk pages.

If you have a relationship with the topics you want to edit, then you will need to review Wikipedia's Conflict of interest policy, which may require you to disclose your relationship and restrict your editing depending upon how you are affiliated with the subject matter. Regardless, editing in a manner that promotes an entity or viewpoint over others can appear to be detrimental to the purpose of Wikipedia and the neutrality required in articles.

Some topic areas within Wikipedia have special editing restrictions that apply to all editors. It's best to avoid these topics until you are extremely familiar with all relevant policies and guidelines.

I hope you find some useful information in all this, and welcome again. --Ronz (talk) 23:29, 26 October 2019 (UTC)

Paul Stamets
Hi Keithdyer101. Thanks for joining the discussion at Talk:Paul Stamets. Please hold off on further content changes until there's clear consensus to do so.

The RfC could use review and closure at this point. It looks to me like it supports some mention of "mycologist" in the lede. Unfortunately, the RfC is short on details, so there's still work to be done on exactly what is appropriate. It's also unclear if the changes made to the lede during the RfC suffice to address the concerns (I don't think so, and the RfC should help make it clear.)

Please take some time to review the talk page discussion, and consider contributing to the RfC before it is closed.

Thanks again. --Ronz (talk) 17:34, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

Please respond. You're at risk of being blocked if you continue to edit-war over the content. --Ronz (talk) 17:35, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

I'm going to assume that you've read the above given your comment here.

There is a formal discussion, an WP:RFC on the article talk page, here. You should comment there before it's too late to do so. --Ronz (talk) 00:34, 1 November 2019 (UTC)

Thank you. I missed the RfC page.