User talk:Keka

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;. Four tildes (&#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! --Ragib 29 June 2005 20:34 (UTC)
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * Merging, redirecting, and renaming pages
 * If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Topical index.

ISO 8859-12
At least an insider telling the story of ISO 8859-12?

The other (celtic) ISO 8859-12 can also be sourced (by asking User:Evercase for example), but I'm also happy to leave it out. I even tried once to get rid of this article, but the Vote for Deletion failed.

Pjacobi 22:46, 25 September 2005 (UTC)

Do we really need
Seperate pages for all the ISO-8859-? encodings that say little more than that they consist of the corresponding ISO 8859-? encoding with the C0 and C1 control codes added? Plugwash 18:10, 1 October 2005 (UTC)


 * Perhaps not. I'll merge them, with proper subheadings, if I get the time. /Keka

Whats wrong with the current format at ISO 8859-15 it clearly introduces the difference between the terms in the intro and the table makes it clear which parts are from ISO 8859-15 and which are from the C0 and C1 control code sets. Plugwash 19:44, 1 October 2005 (UTC)

Category:Windows code pages
In Category:Windows code pages, you've mentioned that Windows-936 was missing, but as far as I know, GBK = Windows 936. (GBK is a superset of GB 2312 with all Unicode 1.0 CJK ideographs) --Hello World! 12:53, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

Move of Single precision
Hi! I noticed that you moved Single precision. It looked like a cut-and-paste move, which isn't allowed on Wikipedia. I might be wrong, but if it was, you can get someone to help you at [Wikipedia:Cut_and_paste_move_repair_holding_pen]]. Thanks,  gENIUS  101  18:02, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

Character encodings
Thanks for adding the   tags to all the character encoding pages. Keeping all the pages consistent is tedious, so any help is appreciated. — Loadmaster (talk) 17:40, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

Rename in pt:wp
See my talk page in pt:wp. Best regards. Alex Pereira 16:23, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

SUL
I'm trying to get this login as my SUL, with no-one else using this login name. There are still a few left, Spanish, Russian, ...
 * I have renamed User:Keka on cawiki, so now you can use it as SUL. --Vriullop (talk) 09:35, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

SUL request in ruwiki
Please confirm, that this request is yours. --Obersachse (talk) 18:55, 13 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Yes, it's from me. keka (talk) 19:00, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
 * OK. Wait a week and the usurpation will be done. --Obersachse (talk) 19:17, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
 * PS. If I forget - kick me!
 * Usurpation is done. — Obersachse (talk) 09:48, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

Edit warring complaint about you
Hello Keka. An editor has filed a complaint at WP:AN3 about your editing of Modulo operation. You may respond in the AN3 discussion if you wish. EdJohnston (talk) 21:39, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

August 2009
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Nja 247 07:49, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Hello Keka. Your theory about 'disguised vandalism' is not correct. (You can confirm this fact if you check WP:VANDAL). This is a response to your note in the AN3 discussion, and to your last edit summary at Modulo operation. Though you may hold Reg Holmes's contributions in low regard, he was not deliberately adding sheer nonsense or swear words. If he believes his additions are helpful, then it's a content dispute. Please pursue dispute resolution. Ask for advice at WT:WPM if necessary. EdJohnston (talk) 23:33, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)