User talk:Kelvintjy

Welcome to Wikipedia
Welcome!

Hello, Kelvintjy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Allen4names 05:45, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Pirate Rangers
SamuraiCast and JEFusion are not reliable sources because they are fansites. Also it's April Fools' Day, so don't believe anything that anyone is claiming is official today.— Ryulong ( 竜龙 ) 19:00, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

Question for administrator
Can you help me delete the photo of the gohonzon in the Sōka Gakkai as the user named Catflap08 keep restoring the picture. I also do not want to be blame for vandalism on that article.

According to my Buddhist believe, photographing of the Gohonzon are discouraged because the resulting copies can be easily desecrated, abused, or misused.

--Kelvintjy (talk) 15:23, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
 * While I appreciate that your beliefs may restrict the distribution of certain images, I'm afraid that our policy is that Wikipedia is not censored. Many religions have such beliefs and trying to satisfy all of them would be incompatible with our goal of building an encyclopedia.  There is some room for compromise in terms of placement and size of images, but this is a matter for discussion on the talk page of the article in question.  If you want to avoid seeing the image yourself, please see Help:Options to hide an image.  If you feel there is some copyright problem with the image being used, you could raise the issue at Media copyright questions.  Cheers, Bovlb (talk) 16:31, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

Taiseki-ji: Shōhondō edits
The information about the architects' opinions on the destruction of Shōhondō reflects Sōka Gakkai bias and does not, in my opinion, merit placement on the page. --Scandiescot — Preceding undated comment added 10:04, 13 September 2013‎
 * The temple was in fact regarded as a masterpiece of modern architecture, and architects in Japan and elsewhere did in fact deplore its demolition. There is nothing biased about reporting these facts. I located an archive of the Washington Post article, and put that paragraph back into the Shōhondō section. --Margin1522 (talk) 11:47, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

Unexplained revert
You recently reverted one of my edits but you didn't use an edit summary or open a discussion in Talk. Can you please explain why you reverted my edit? In other words, what is it about the cited source that makes you believe that it's (a) reliable and (b) noteworthy enough to include in an encyclopedia article? Have any scholars or experts ever used that ranking or written favorably about it or is it just one of dozens of new rankings that proliferate on the Internet as people try to proclaim themselves experts whose products we should purchase? ElKevbo (talk) 16:13, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

February 2017
Hello, I'm Prolog. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Club of Rome, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Please note that the verifiability policy mandates that unsourced material that has been challenged, such as by a "fact" tag, or by its removal, may not be added back without a reliable, published source being cited for the content, using an inline citation. The cited source must clearly support the material as presented in the article, and the burden is on the person wishing to keep in the disputed material. So if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so, following these requirements! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Prolog (talk) 18:46, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

August 2017
Please do not add or change content, as you did at The Wolf of Wall Street (2013 film), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Sum mer PhD v2.0 17:53, 15 August 2017 (UTC)


 * I see you made this same change before, also without explanation. Please discuss the issue on the article's talk page before continuing. - Sum mer PhD v2.0 17:54, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

Soka Gakkai Educational activities
I know you have edited the section on "educational activities" on the Soka Gakkai page. Are you the one responsible for the new "Soka Education System" page? If so - nice going. If not -- check it out. Thanks. --Daveler16 (talk) 20:02, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

Nichiren Shoshu
Thanks for the tip. I'll check it out. You know, Hardly ANYTHING in the N Shoshu entry has a valid reference. --Daveler16 (talk) 17:47, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

WP:CITEKILL
This is the second time you've added numerous superfluous references to the Soka Gakkai article. Please read WP:CITEKILL and adhere to it moving forward. Three or four is more than enough. wound theology ◈  06:53, 20 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Kelvintjy : you also have been modifying the Daisaku Ikeda article without any arguments of using the "Talk" page. The change you made there (change = just getting back to an older version) does not respect several WP rules, among which the most important : NPOV. For instance, writing that Ikeda was a controversial leader is not an opinion, it's just a fact, it's sourced, and I am wondering what reasons you may have to censore this. Also, if you are a member of an organization and act on WP without being honnest about it, that is another rule you are breaking. Raoul mishima (talk) 14:37, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

ANI Notice
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. GrayStorm(Complaints Dept.&#124;My Contribs.) 01:05, 23 June 2024 (UTC)

Soka Gakkai International
It is fine if you object to the redirect. But you need to discuss exactly why you object to it when reverting. wound theology ◈  11:15, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

July 2024
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Political dissidence in the Empire of Japan. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Please engage in the discussion on the talk page. Peaceray (talk) 15:41, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Peaceray (talk) 15:48, 16 July 2024 (UTC)


 * Dear kelvin@Kelvintjy,
 * Will you please tell us now what’s going on ? Raoul mishima (talk) 17:12, 20 July 2024 (UTC)