User talk:Kgwu24

CM & DA
Please note my redirecting of Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy EJohn59 (talk) 10:28, 23 November 2008 (UTC)EJohn59

Series for Chemists
Yo, KG ole buddy, see my latest series of contributions. How 'bout you do similar feats to the chemists. ;-)--EJohn59 (talk) 14:50, 26 May 2009 (UTC)EJohn59

iGoogle
One more topic -- what about that iGoogle upload matter?--EJohn59 (talk) 04:33, 27 May 2009 (UTC)EJohn59

On bolding nobel prize wins
Not that I claim to be an expert on Wikipedia formatting conventions, but I'm fairly sure that edits like this one don't conform to the Manual of Style. Usually, only the article title (and sometimes not even that) is boldfaced in the article prose, save for a very few exceptions. Please see Manual of Style (text formatting). 87.79.170.93 (talk) 18:42, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

Apology
Sorry gave you bad suggestion on the chemist stuff.--EJohn59 (talk) 23:19, 11 June 2009 (UTC)EJohn

Re: N C Yeh
OK, see my talk page. DGG has fixed that ref. but no hyperlink, only print ref.--EJohn59 (talk) 23:19, 25 June 2009 (UTC)EJohn

Hey, you can eliminate the stub status, but personally, I like that Einstein picture on the stub page, especially for a female scientist.--EJohn59 (talk) 22:29, 6 July 2009 (UTC)EJohn

Studies in Applied Mathematics
Hey, look at this article. There is that editor-in-chief Benney who has no Wiki entry. See if you can find more info. It bugs me that some big guy like this has a kind of missing link. It feels incomplete. ;-(--EJohn59 (talk) 23:08, 14 July 2009 (UTC)EJohn

Obama page rank
See this question: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Henrik#Most_frequented_pages I'm dying to know which 478 pages rank above Obama. I'd have guessed that he should rank at least in the top 50 ;-) Maybe we in the US are too Ameriko-centric. ;-)--EJohn59 (talk) 17:06, 23 October 2009 (UTC)EJ

The most expensive kiss
Yikes! Is this kiss for real?--EJohn59 (talk) 19:43, 25 October 2009 (UTC)EJ

Bravo to Jayron
Thanks for blocking that Duchamp guy. He's disruptive and always looking for arguments. If you look at the section on "personal attacks" in his talk page, you'll see how he talked down to a young lady, even putting her picture there. He's the type that gives Wiki a bad name, and turns away people. --Kgwu24 (talk) 22:58, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

Richard Lindzen
Thank you for your contributions to the encyclopedia! In case you are not already aware, an article to which you have recently contributed is on article probation. -- TS 16:04, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

Lindzen AMWS bio
Hi there, based on your edit to Lindzen's biography, it appears you may have access to this volume. My library doesn't have it, so I'm wondering if you would have time to answer a couple of questions about the source? I'll await your response here before writing up the questions. Alex Harvey (talk) 07:15, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm traveling these 10 days so won't have a chance to access local college lib (I have no online privilege), Feel free to give questions and await answers, but if you go to any local college lib, most have a subscription.KG--Kgwu24 (talk) 14:36, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Pls help on Chinese page for Benjamin Wah
Pls take a look. I rewrote page in /temp file. I'd like to delete my original entry and let you re-submit my /temp file for me. Thx --QES girl (talk) 04:33, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

Needham
Joseph Needham considered bridge between west & China. Pls see my list of refs at User_talk:Daikang59--Daikang59 (talk) 03:32, 20 February 2013 (UTC)DK59; also this link on the Chinese side, talk on zh side--Daikang59 (talk) 05:28, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

April 2016
Your recent editing history at Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Dr.  K.  00:55, 17 April 2016 (UTC)