User talk:Khufu2019

Your submission at Articles for creation: Prime Press Ltd (April 6)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mcmatter was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Prime Press Ltd and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Prime_Press_Ltd Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mcmatter&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Prime_Press_Ltd reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 03:46, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

April 2024
Hello Khufu2019. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Khufu2019. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 01:10, 7 April 2024 (UTC)


 * No compensation at all, just give me a hand in this article and I won't edit more as actually I don't have what to add more. Just I am requesting help on article and the logo to add this article like other companies article based of course on Terms of Use.
 * Best Khufu2019 (talk) 15:33, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Then why did you claim the logo in commons as your own work?
 * Why the urgency for the creation of an article about a company you yourself claim as not that well known, which by extension indicates not notable.
 * If you truly have no connection with this company then take some time and learn about Wikipedia and about the processes and policies in existing articles. Start small and expand as you gain more experience. McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 17:20, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
 * I will find someone else to help me. Thanks a lot Khufu2019 (talk) 17:21, 7 April 2024 (UTC)