User talk:Kielbasa1

IP block exempt
I have granted your account an exemption from IP blocking. This will allow you to edit through full blocks affecting your IP address when you are logged in.

Please read the page IP block exemption carefully, especially the section on IP block exemption conditions.

Note in particular that you are not permitted to use this newly-granted right to edit Wikipedia via anonymous proxies, or disruptively. If you do, or there is a serious concern of abuse, then the right may be removed by any administrator.

Appropriate usage and compliance with the policy may be checked periodically, due to the nature of block exemption, and block exemption will be removed when no longer needed (for example, when the block it is related to expires).

I hope this will enhance your editing, and allow you to edit successfully and without disruption. Daniel Case (talk) 15:25, 29 September 2011 (UTC)

Hildebrand
Hi Kielbasa1. In reposnse to your query about the -brand in Hildebrand on my Talk page, I've posted some info at Talk:Hildebrand. --Pfold (talk) 13:19, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Sumerian and Language Isolate
If I didnt misunderstood, you offer a consensus. If so, yes I agree. Because the edition I prefer for these pages is something like that. Just I demand a revision in the manner and fashion of language/discourse of the article. Now, it is too decisive. An expression like this; -currently, Sumeran is (can be) considered a language isolate, but there are probable (likely) relatives (connected languages). Evidences are weak and and further research needed-.. Something like that.

Thank you for your considerations.Okurogluselo : Blah 20:51, 4 June 2015 (UTC)


 * But if the evidence is weak, then the 'relatives' aren't probable. And if we included every suggested family like that, then there would be one for every language on the article, including Basque. The improbable families (like Khoisan or Hokan) that are in the article are included because the 'families' are still believed in by a significant number of non-linguists. Ural-Altaic is both nearly universally rejected (especially as containing Sumerian) and quite obscure. The Sumerian language page already has a section for proposed relatives. Kielbasa1 (talk) 21:32, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

See. So say, not weak, disputable or something like that. Minority view. In fact, I dont approve that Ural-Altaic exist, researches is not enough. In fact, even the situation of Altaic is arguable, because of the place of Mongol language. So, even Taivo introduced me in other way, I dont defend any relatives of Sumerian with Ural-Altaic. Anyway, US universities and Russians dont like to study this area, and others dont have enough sources for research.

You may remember, just I dont feel comfortable with the the article of Language Isolate. I want the usage of modal "can be" instead of "is". Also, minority view references could be given. Yes, there is a view about that Sumerian is langauge isolate but there are other views. By the way, majority view also needs references in the article. Not only for the short section of Sumerian, but also for all article.

And as you said, in the Article of Sumerian Language there is a list of researches about cognates. So a sentence about "other views", "minority" or "objections" could be added to the Language Isolate section. Anyway, it is an extict language and it is hard to be so decisive about its situation.

I initiated a discussion in the talk page of Language Isolate. May I invite you to consider the issue? I declared some problems about cuneiforms and restrictions on the Sumerian studies, also some questionnarie points oabout the studies and majority views. That is why I think minortiy views could replace the majority in the future. It is not a bad thing to encourage young readers to study Sumerian. And, even some other claim it differently, there is nothing to be in conflict with any wiki principles. It is not against WP:UNDUE or WP:FRINGE because, still I say minority should be introduced as minority.

Please take look to the talk page. I dont expect support,it is up to you as a free soul. Just I think you are reasonable. Thank you.Okurogluselo : Blah 01:19, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Pomio Kivung moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Pomio Kivung, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Cheers Mgbo120  19:06, 27 March 2019 (UTC)


 * What changes were you looking for exactly? There are two, thorough, academic-quality references there.Kielbasa1 (talk) 19:42, 27 March 2019 (UTC)


 * I've submitted the article for review essentially as is. I would still very much like to hear what you think it's missing. Did you actually check the sources, or do you have much knowledge of Papuan religious systems in general? Kielbasa1 (talk) 03:01, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
==Discussion at Talk:1257 Samalas eruption § "Very large volcanic eruptions can cause significant human hardship, including famine, away from the volcano due to their effect on climate. The social effects are often reduced by the resilience of humans."== You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:1257 Samalas eruption § "Very large volcanic eruptions can cause significant human hardship, including famine, away from the volcano due to their effect on climate. The social effects are often reduced by the resilience of humans.". Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 16:29, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kassites, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Akkadian. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)