User talk:Kiran567


 * } &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;   &#9743;(talk)  21:39, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kunal Sood


A tag has been placed on Kunal Sood requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. KingofEnggs (talk) 18:40, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of David Record


A tag has been placed on David Record requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. —C.Fred (talk) 19:41, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Tagged David Record for Speedy Deletion
Hello Kiran567,

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged this page for speedy deletion. This page has been rejected twice and deleted twice before. Please do not remove this tag, but you can contest speedy deletion for this page. Ireneshih (talk) 09:21, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

why you nominating this page for deletion it is notable page,

This page has been deleted by User:Admrboltz on 13:36, 31 January 2014. If you think page is notable, than you can contest speedy deletion, but do not remove notice. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/David_Record https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:David_Record&action=edit&redlink=1

09:26, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at David Record shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.  Velella  Velella Talk 09:37, 7 February 2014 (UTC)