User talk:Kitty~enwiki

Oh my god you are a Sockpuppet of EL C. I will get you blocked. Redwolf24 (talk) 11:11, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Silly human, I've got 8 more lives! Kitty 11:30, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
 * May I pet? 71.112.135.125 12:21, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Request for petting granted, on condition that tuna. Kitty 18:57, 3 January 2606 (UTC)
 * Rub his tummy; that usually tends to appease him. El_C 19:01, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
 * As long as it involves Tuna in some capacity or another. P.S. my owner is an idiot. Kitty 19:02, 3 January 2666 (UTC)


 * Join the Cat Cabal composed of:
 * User:Cool Cat
 * User:Woohookitty and I will give you tuna and milk. :)

P.S. I think Cool Cat is related to you; a distant cousin perhaps..? -MegamanZero|Talk 09:13, 6 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Regardless, we are all one feline race &mdash; so I was telling this leopard the other day... Needless to say, hilarities ensured. Kitty 06:0ɘ, 11 January 2006

Well aren't you just the cutest little thing! I could look at you all day long... why are you looking at me like that? With those massive eyes? And that demonic stare? Are you satan? Or worse - a scientologist??? Wally 22:08, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
 * ♫Trust in me, just in me...♪I could be looked at by you all day, but it will cost you! (yes, that's right, Tuna!; also, my owner is especially fond of shrubbery, and especially-especially, more shrubbery! And free drugs!). Thanks in advance! Kitty 06:0ɘ, 11 January 2006

Question on Chihuahuas
deeceevoice asked, on my Talk page, whether you eat Chihuahuas. KillerChihuahua is most distressed at the idea. So I thought I'd ask you myself. Guettarda 18:34, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Only in fish form, or seafood (or see? Food!) context. Kitty 07:12, 10 June 2006 (UTC)




 * Yummy! I also note that The icefishes (or white-blooded fishes) are a family (Channichthyidae) of perciform fish found in the cold waters around Antarctica and South America, where a certain Arctic balloon expedition went very wrong in 1897. Kitty 04:23, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

The kiss of freedom
There's a lot of history, you know, in this car. I've been living in this car and its been a big part of my life. But you know its fucked me around quite a bit and sometimes it stalls on you, doesn't work right. You get to need to go somewhere and it's like, no, you're not fucking going anywhere because i'm gonna fuckin' stall on ya and it pisses you off. El_C 10:57, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

Fuck community college, let's get drunk and eat chicken fingers!
And you can teach how to get drunk, get fired from the police force, become a lousy trailer park supervisor that sucks, hangs around with a fucking idiot that doesn't wear a shirt and looks like a dick but thinks he looks good-101! El_C 10:57, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

If I can't smoke and swear I'm fucked
Thank you, your majesty. My first order of business is to tell the prosecutor to shut the fuck up, and wipe that stupid fucking grin off his face becasue it's distraculating my case. Next, I'd like to announce that Randy and Lahey have been drinking all day and they're wasted out of their fuckin minds, and they're both assholes. And the testimony they just gave is total fuckin bullshit and I can prove it ... Clearly Cory and Trevor accepted money on film, and they admitted they stole gas. And they're sick. I mean, look at them. That's gas sickness. Fucking idiots. I got nothing else to say right now except that the Crown and Lahey can go fuck themselves. The defense rests, everybody can fuck off. Except you, I didn't mean you. But those two guys, and him. Can you guys get the fuck out of the way, please? El_C 10:57, 30 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Stay away from the brown acid. The brown acid is poison, man.  Geogre 21:01, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Trinity has Got to quit smoking, like i can't have her smoking anymore, it's ridiculous. El_C 23:06, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

Temporary Relief Assistant Trailer Park Supervisor
I guess you didn't hear what I just said. First thing i said was "It's my walkie now." Second thing was "you're suspended." And the Fourth Thing was "FUCK OFF!" El_C 23:06, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

I'm not gay, I love Lucy. Wait a second, maybe I am gay
You know, there's certain accidents where you may be drunk and on drugs, but, it's gona happen anyway whether you are or you're not. Garbage truck, I mean the shocks are different, there's a lot more weight. Next thing I know, we're crashing into stuff, things are catching on fire. Like I said, it was no big deal. I don't know why I got fired over it, which really pissed me off. El_C 11:10, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

Jim Lahey Is a fuckin' drunk and he always will be
''Breaker, breaker, come in earth. This is rocketship 27, aliens have fucked over the carbonator in engine number four, I'm gonna try to refuckulate it and land on Juniper, hopefuly they got some space weed. Over.'' How's that, buddy? I don't fuckin' know! NÁSA power rockets are firing all over the place, they got lasers and shooting and, uh... Bubles, I can't fuckin do this, my brain dosen't work with space talk, I hate playing space! El_C 22:27, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
 * And IRC had better not kick any of my fiancés if they know what's good for them! Bishonen | talk 22:35, 1 June 2006 (UTC).
 * Trinity, what the hell are you doing driving this car? Did your father tell you to drive...? Trinity, stop the car right now! TRINITY! I'M IMPOUNDING THIS VEHICLE! STOP THE CAR! ... Randy, did you see that? Goddanm shitapple driving the shitmobile. What kind of father let's his daughter do that? Nobody in this goddamn park gives a fuck, why the hell should I? El_C 05:09, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

I am the liquor
I just want to say that just because Lucy spent the night in the drunk tank, dosen't mean she's a bad mother, I mean, everyone spends nights at the drunk tank. I've been there about ten times, I'm sure you have and you guys have, it's not a big deal, just happens everyonce in a while. And the problem was that she lives with this girl named Sarah, who smokes a ton of weed, and that's what happens: When Lucy gets drunk, she's fine. She gets drunk and smokes a joint of hash, she's fine. She gets drunk and smokes a joint of weed, she's a different person. And that's why she ended up in the drunk tank, because of Sarah and her little weed joints. But as for the open liquor, I mean, I live in my car. My car is my home. So that should'nt have been open liquor anyway. You guys must have liquor around your house, probably all kinds of liquor; I'm sure you got liquor at your home. Cops pull you over in your house, how is that open liquor? Anyway, the big thing is [augh, just dropped my smoke there]: I'm gonna have a lot of money coming to me in the next couple of days, which, I'm not gonna tell you how I'm making it, but it's gonna be a lot of money. Gonna bail my dad out of jail and I'll buy a trailer. I'll be living there, Lucy will be living there, there's going to be lot's of people watching over Trinity, so this can't ever happen again. And you know, if you just release her, send her back to her mom; her mom is great, good mother. And I'll be looking after her once in a while when she is drinking, but other than that, she'll be always watched, and my dad can watch her when he's not drunk. But tonight I'm getting drunk, because it's my turn. Lucy got drunk yesterday and this is my day, so I'm gonna get her... I'm not gonna drink before she gets home, I'm gonna get her to Lucy, Lucy will be watching her, then I'll have some drinks. So, yeah, I think we're done here, and I'll just pick up my duaghter and take her home to Lucy. Get drunk. El_C 05:09, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

A dope trailer is no place for a kitty
Oh, I get it. Treena, that's a great idea! Julian, books have stuff recorded down all over the years from people, and if we can find a book with someone who had similar problems, just take what they wrote down in the book and [augh, fuck! sorry, Treena] take what they wrote down and make it ours. El_C 07:30, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
 * "I've noticed that if you throw something into a water... body like a lake or an ocean, that it doesn't come back and it's gone, somehow it takes it away and filters it through, and it just cleans it up like a garbage compacter. It's not really littering if you ask me"--Gcilley (talk) 19:56, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

"Attica! Attica!"
... I go off and get drunk in the Caribbean, and come back to find all of you were apparently less connected than I... What psychotomimetic drugs were you all taking? KillerChihuahua?!? 16:03, 5 June 2006 (UTC)


 * I'm not sure who gave El C the overripe rye bread, but all this love of the proletariat is getting out of hand. There's a reason we're trying to free those people.  Now they should just hold still and vote socialist, and we'll be helping them along soon.  Geogre 16:27, 5 June 2006 (UTC)


 * I like this "getting out of hand" sentiments that my various Ricky quotations are invoking., although I think he's is more of a [lovable] lumpen. But as for how far voting can free the people, as Chairman Mao said: the bullet, not the ballot. El_C 23:16, 5 June 2006 (UTC)


 * "The Bible or the ballot/ The bullet or the gun." Yeah, yeah, but any violent overthrow fostered by, designed by, led by, or containing non-proles is just another totalitarianism.  Meanwhile, actual socialism of a non-19th-century-economic-theorist variety comes through the ballot, not the bullet, and leaves all alive, not some dancing on graves.  I already have a religion and don't need to believe so fervently in one disgruntled Hegelian that I'll pass up social justice that doesn't fit his predictions.  Geogre 04:09, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, "yeah yeah," this is no longer the 19th Century, some things change but some fundamentals stay the same. I have no need for a religion, and you'd be critically mistaken to confuse a breadth of vision with faith, or militant rhetoric with crude anarchoangst ... if you actually get down to whichever underlying particulars. I'm uninterested in prediction and prophecies, then, but am confident in the inevitability of certain things becoming explicable in the course of human history. Violence is tragic, but these are violent conditions and tragic times for billions of people. Hunger is violence, as is plunder. I want no violence, in any sense of the word, but I also know that the imperialists will (and have been) wage war over their continued ownership of the planet, and they are able to do it effectively because they are in power right now. At some point in time, the people will prove well-organized, well-led, and progressive enough to be able to defeat them. It may take hundreds of years, hopefuly less. But so long as the imperialists are allowed to exist as such, an existence which is indefinitely guranteed when accepting parliamentary and electoral machinations as a final strategy, there will be no end in sight, no possibility for a stable (not to mention, genuine and holistic) social justice. Obviosuly, I'm not calling for armed struggle in countries that are more suited at the present time to legal forms of struggle, I only emphasize on the revolutionary character that this struggle needs to take. Because I'm realistic about the lengths the imperialists will go to forever stay in power; on what it would take to overthrow them, and the realities that define the nature of their system, this system, the unfathomable toll it takes on humanity. El_C 06:01, 6 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The one critical mistake there is assuming that "they" won't be "them." In the past, every armed revolution for justice has been led by someone who turns it to private benefit and who always intended to do so.  Perhaps the Zapatistas are pure, but they also struggle not for The Revolution but for indigent rights.  Imperialists will do anything to remain?  Indeed.  They'll coopt revolutions, join juntas, and this is when the revolutionaries and juntas don't decide to become ideological imperialists and justify their own economic parasitism by pointing to the bearded Hegelian instead of the periwigged republicans.  The reason I applaud the Sandanistas, and few others, is that they were a democratic socialism and willingly stepped down when they lost elections.  Only having the people continually controlling will enable anything like a socialist state; otherwise, it's one totalitarianism that becomes imperialistic vs. another.  Geogre 12:21, 6 June 2006 (UTC)


 * If a formerly revolutionary party sells out and becomes social imperialist, as the USSR and the PRC did, they need to be overthrown, too. But put back on track, not replaced with other imperialists. This is one of the lessons that needs to be drawn from the mistakes of the past. It isn't possible to build socialism in countries to the point where these contradictions no longer exist so long as one buys into these liberal-democratic games as the will of the people. Inhabitants of imperialist countries especially have been indoctrinated from a very early age not to intellectually surpass certain limitations which ultimately serve to defend the vital interests of the imperialists. This, then, is expressed even among more progressive tendencies, in romaticized and unscientific notions, ones which distort both the meaning of and relationality between democracy and dictatorship. While I applaud moderate progressive forces such as the Sandinistas and the Zapatistas (even Emiliano Zapata was ultimately a moderate progressive), I support the FARC-EP and others who offer a broader vision, one ultimately not bound by parochial localism. A socialist state is but one key stage of the struggle. It will not be possible to share power and resources in this planet in a natural and noncoersive way by envisioning socialist (or any) states existing indefinitely. But giving up on revolution because it might go wrong and one would need to take a few steps back before taking further steps forward, or even starting it all over, is far too deterministic and historically unhumble for me. The tired claim that the failure of revolutions in this past century are bound to be repeated in that sense for all centuries to come, is the sort of human nature argument that I reject and history has rejected; for ex., the supposed (sub)human nature of women, of different ethnic groups, and so on. Those contradictions once thought of as the final (biblical & otherwise) word, are still with us to the detriment of all but the imperialists and their lackyes. With the contradiction of class gone, they too will become but a fleeting nightmerish memory. But with easily circumvented or suppressed electoralism as a final strategy, all these contradictions will remain a reality. I look beyond them. El_C 21:26, 6 June 2006 (UTC)


 * So you want to believe in History, because it shows the necessity of a revolution, but you don't want to believe in history that shows that every worker's revolution has been a totalitarian one? You want to relegate any concepts of representation to the dustbin because they were cooked up by gentry, but you want to hang onto concepts of classless societies despite their being concocted by a German gentry?  You want the will of the people to be invisibly present in the future society, but you don't want to hear from them in any say on the government?  And, if any particular historical example turns out to be corrupt, you want to say that it wasn't genuine.  More, though, you say that people can't tell what they want because of their historical conditioning, and yet you can see what they should want in spite of historical conditioning.  Finally, while you are against imperialism (presumably as an economic formation), you dismiss any local social justice in favor of those who believe in invading their neighbors to spread the good word of socialism.  Sorry, but I'm of my own opinion still.  Geogre 04:49, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

In chopped order: Q1. So you want to believe in History, because it shows the necessity of a revolution, but you don't want to believe in history that shows that every worker's revolution has been a totalitarian one?
 * A1. I don't believe every worker's revolution has been a totalitarian one, I do believe that inhabitants of imperialists countries have been indoctrinated from a very early age to think that.

Q2. You want to relegate any concepts of representation to the dustbin [of history ?]
 * A2. Far from relegating every concept of representation, I want ones the imperialists do not control, even indirectly, by virtue of owning the means of communication in that society, and so on.

Q3. Because they were cooked up by gentry [?]
 * A3. I fail to see where I mentioned the gentry.

Q4. [B]ut you want to hang onto concepts of classless societies despite their being concocted by a German gentry?
 * A4. I'm not following how that. Yes, the concept of a classless society, eventually. But inhabitants of imperialist countries have been indoctrinated to see such a stage as impossible or the opposite of what it is (i.e. as monolithic, boring uniformity, etc.)

Q5. You want the will of the people to be invisibly present in the future society, but you don't want to hear from them in any say on the government?
 * A5. I want them to end up having more of a say, I just don't want to be an imperialist-dominated government. The dictatorship would be over the imperialists and the democracy of and by the people, the opposite of how it is now, where the imperialists impose their dictatorship (electoral & otherwise illusions aside) over the people. But eventually, there will be no need of a government as we understand it.

Q6. [I]f any particular historical example turns out to be corrupt, you want to say that it wasn't genuine.
 * A6. If something (anything) turns out to be corrupt, than either it wasn't genuine to begin with, or at some point it stopped being genuine.

Q7. More, though, you say that people can't tell what they want because of their historical conditioning, and yet you can see what they should want in spite of historical conditioning[?]
 * A7. Moi? In spite of and because of historical conditioning, with science and a correct scientific theory we can go beyond the abyss. But, no, it is revolutionary conditions that result in more people becoming open to what myself and my comrades are for, or nothing happens.

Q8. [W]hile you are against imperialism (presumably as an economic formation), you dismiss any local social justice in favor of those who believe in invading their neighbors to spread the good word of socialism.
 * A8. Against imperialism in all its form, of course, though my focus is economic (for a reason). I far from dismissed local social justice, even when it is (what I think you meant to say) of a narrow scope. But I am for acting local and think global. Nor do I think (or anywhere said) that I support invasions or finds these particularly useful or progressive, though in some instances they may well be.

Q9. Sorry, but I'm of my own opinion still.
 * A9. `You would go into the militia yourself,' was Ernest's retort, `and be sent to Maine, or Florida, or the Philippines, or anywhere else, to drown in blood your own comrades civil-warring for their liberties. While from Kansas, or Wisconsin, or any other state, your own comrades would go into the militia and come here to California to drown in blood your own civil-warring.' `Not when the government suspends civil law. In that day when you speak of rising in your strength, your strength would be turned against yourself. Into the militia you would go, willy-nilly. Habeas corpus, I heard some one mutter just now. Instead of habeas corpus you would get post mortems. If you refused to go into the militia, or to obey after you were in, you would be tried by drumhead court martial and shot down like dogs. It is the law.' El_C 08:23, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

When the Revolution Comes (an original poem

 * When the revolution occurs, the best that can be imagined will be;
 * And the student leader will be draped in a sheet, head back,
 * While a friendly lady shampoos his hair before the stylist goes to work.
 * The sun's rays will shatter on the erupting glass of the shop door
 * And the revolutionary, bulging in striped horizontal spandex,
 * With her burp gun now vomitting its bullets, will take her aims
 * Out to the street.
 * The moment, like lightning from east to west across the skies,
 * Like a bridegroom coming to the hall at night, when the virgins run out of oil,
 * Will catch the organizer awash, plashing, staring,
 * While a deluxe massager shower head beats his throbbing neck
 * As the workers in Guatemala never intended when they put it together.
 * The small beer men will hardly notice.
 * The torturer, looking up from the water dancing on the cloth over the stubble
 * Of a three year old "ticking bomb," will tell himself again that it's worth it.
 * Some people will get shot, and some will do the shooting, and he can be one or the other.
 * The revolution will be only as great as we can imagine it.

Geogre 16:10, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

Most dangerous
Most treacherous is not the robbery of hard earned wages Most horrible is not the torture by the police. Most dangerous is not the graft for the treason and greed.

To be caught while asleep is surely bad surely bad is to be buried in silence But it is not most dangerous.

To remain dumb and silent in the face of trickery Even when just, is definitely bad Surely bad is reading in the light of a firefly But it is not most dangerous Most dangerous is To be filled with dead peace Not to feel agony and bear it all, Leaving home for work And from work return home Most dangerous is the death of our dreams.

Most dangerous is that watch Which run on your wrist But stand still for your eyes.

Most dangerous is that eye Which sees all but remains frostlike, The eye that forgets to kiss the world with love, The eye lost in the blinding mist of the material world. That sinks the simple meaning of visible things And is lost in the meaning return of useless games.

Most dangerous is the moon Which rises in the numb yard After each murder, But does not pierce your eyes like hot chills.

Most dangerous is the song Which climbs the mourning wail In order to reach your ears And repeats the cough of an evil man At the door of the frightened people.

Most dangerous is the night Falling in the sky of living souls, Extinguishing them all In which only owls shriek and jackals growl, And eternal darkness covers all the windows.

Most heinous is the direction In which the sun of the soul light Pierces the east of your body.

Most treacherous is not the robbery of hard earned wages Most horrible is not the torture of police Most dangerous is not graft taken for greed and treason. -- Paash

El_C 20:48, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

What else can he also be called

 * Most species with black and white fur have special traits. (Whit Gibbons, "Not all answers are Black & White," Econoview, April 29, 2001)

Try to expand this encyclopedic list. There's only one rule, it has to be a black & white, or he can't be called that due to fur. Kitty, you're a... 1897 photo from the Andrée expedition which was retrieved from a glacier in 1930.[?] [Don't "?" me; you'll just have to read the article, won't you?] 1. Panda 2. Penguin 3. Puffin 4. Black-and-white Ruffed Lemur 5. Baird's Tapir 6. Orca 7. Badger 8. Moo-moo cow 9. Black-and-white colobus monkey 10. Black-and-white Warbler 11. Okapi 12. Indri 13. Slow loris 14. Siberian Husky 15. Canadian goose 16. Black-footed Ferret 17. Raccoon 18. Skunk 19. Antilope 20. Zebra 21. Siberian Chipmunk 22. East African Oryx 23. White-eared Bulbul 24. Toco Toucan 25. Dalmatian 26. Abyssinian Guinea Pig 27. Numbat 28. Petaurus 29. Southern Tamandua 30. Spiny rat 31. Brush-tailed porcupine 32. Pale-throated Three-toed Sloth 33. Sugar Glider El_C 12:43, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

34. Newspaper. Geogre 13:37, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Struck out, a newspaper is not alive! El_C 23:11, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
 * You said there was only one rule. There seems to be another. &mdash;Bunchofgrapes (talk) 23:13, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

34. Asian Longhorned Beetle &mdash;Bunchofgrapes (talk) 23:17, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

Fine! 35. Nun Geogre 23:18, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

36. Minute pirate bug. &mdash;Bunchofgrapes (talk) 23:19, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

37. Black Rat Snake - KillerChihuahua?!? 23:20, 9 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Now that's what I'm talking about! If we reach 100, the universe may collapse onto itself. So let's do that! El_C 23:29, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

38. Sclater's Guenon are you sure we can't just stop at 50? This is getting to be a challenge. KillerChihuahua?!? 23:53, 9 June 2006 (UTC) 39. Piebald RossPatterson 02:29, 10 June 2006 (UTC) 40. Black-veined White (What's not to love about that name?) 41. Small White 42. Large White 43. Zebra Swallowtail Butterfly &mdash;Bunchofgrapes (talk) 02:38, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

44. Absolute truth. 45. Oreo. (Oreos are the stuff of life.) Geogre 03:41, 10 June 2006 (UTC) 46. Relativity (M. C. Escher) Bishonen | talk 05:47, 10 June 2006 (UTC). 47. A Polar Bear smoking a licorice pipe (Hello, Kitty!) Bishonen | talk 06:01, 10 June 2006 (UTC).
 * Hello! Kitty 07:09, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

48. Magpie Bishonen | talk 10:54, 10 June 2006 (UTC).

49. Mormon missionary Geogre 11:37, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

50. Referee who makes a mistaken foul call in the Sweden/Trinidad & Tobago match. Geogre 16:50, 10 June 2006 (UTC) 51. Duct tape - light on one side, dark on the other, it holds the universe together. RossPatterson 20:48, 10 June 2006 (UTC) 52. Tiddlywinks. Geogre 02:01, 11 June 2006 (UTC) 53. Jake 54. Elwood.  + +Lar: t/c 12:54, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Speech
[Test, test] Who in this park, or even who in the whole world, dosen't have problems? Who dosen't have a drink too many times once in a while, and even windes up passing out in their own driveway, pissing themsleves? Heuh? I mean, seriously. Or who dosen't have a little pot from time to time? Or who dosen't have problems with the people they love? Randy. Everybody. Now, I apologize for my neglect of the things that are most important to me. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. Because this park, it's the most important thing in my life and it always will be, and so are all of you. Because this is our home; this is our community! I am Jim Lahey, and I am your trailer park supervisor. Thanks, for coming, Randy, everybody. El_C 03:42, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

I am a Doctor
Ricky: Excuse me, I am a Doctor, he's a mental patient and he's on drugs. Just brought him down here for a little nature time. Um. Everything's cool.

Woman: Listen, I want this boy taken to town!

Ricky: No, I'm taking him to the hospital right now, he's a mental patient. I'm a medical Doctor, I am. That's my Doctor Car right there... [Get in the fuckin car, Trever!]

Woman: I'm gonna call the cops!

Ricky: You don't have to call the cops, I'm a Doctor! El_C 08:23, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

Low profile
Julian: Listen, all you gotta do is keep a low profile, okay? And I'm gonna work on getting you out.

Ray: Low profile, Julian? What, you've been reading books again?

Julian: What's wrong with reading books?

Ray: Nothing's wrong with reading books, but there's only one book that counts, and that's The Bible. It says to help your friends.

Julian: Does it say anything about ripping off insurance companies, pretending you're in a wheel chair, and then getting caught drunk, dancing with hoes making porno flicks? Huh? Anything in your book about that, Ray?

Ray: It's open to interpretation. El_C 21:46, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Rejected insights: "Tragico-comical title proposal"
Hey, what happned to my highly insightful, nonnnnpov edits? This is an outrage!!7 Therefore, I propose we rename this article The historical ironies, claims of, and frightening realities behind the use of the term Israeli Apartheid. Who else supports? 72.232.204.226 10:03, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Support:
 * 1) I support. 72.232.204.226 10:03, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
 * I, also, support. 72.232.204.226 10:03, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
 * 1) Strong support for inventive new title. 72.232.204.226 10:03, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) A brief title that says it all. 72.232.204.226 10:03, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) This title is paradigm all on its own. 72.232.204.226 10:03, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) Per everyone above. 72.232.204.226 10:03, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose
 * 1) Oppose not descriptive enough title. El_C 10:17, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Oppose Humus sapiens' continued inability to recognize that I'm 72.xx. El_C 10:17, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) Oppose not wasting talk page space on this. El_C 10:17, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) Oppose per schizophrenia. El_C 10:17, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

~I totally oppose to this page. What was just added is a HUGE waste of place. :(


 * Vommit in terror and rage:
 * Boo, that was terrible! Kitty 11:33, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
 * 1) You suck! Kitty 11:33, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Get off the stage! Kitty 11:33, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

~I totally agree. GET OFF THE STAGE!! That was really really bad. Dirty, sick, and just plain wrong. I'm absolutly disgusted. Besides, 90% of that stuff doesn't have ANYTHING to do with Kitty!!! :(

I am Sexy wanna Rape me?

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Kitty. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Kitty~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 00:57, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 15:01, 22 April 2015 (UTC)