User talk:Koheli

For info related to your citation style...
Please also check out Wikipedia_talk:Citing_sources. -- SPhilbrick  T  00:02, 3 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Thank you for the citation page link, not quite sure I understood what the "verdict" is, can I use Cref? Thank you for the image help link and your kind support. Koheli (talk) 01:37, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

Atlantis (newspaper)
That code only works in some browsers. Since you saw the change, your browser should be one of those that supports the code. The only other thing I can think of is that the window size is different. If there is not sufficient space to display more then one column, that is is all you will get. Try viewing the page full screen and see what happens. Vegaswikian (talk) 05:00, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Vlasto, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Princeton. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:28, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Selwyn Raab, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page AMC. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

St. Ann & the Holy Trinity Church
I've reverted a number of your recent edits to this article, as they deleted sourced material without any explanation in the edit summary as to why they shouldn't be in the article. Please do not restore them, instead, per WP:BRD, start a discussion on the article's talk page as yo why you think the article is improved without that material.

I also need to ask you if you are in any way connected to the church. If you are, you should read our policy on editing with a conflict of interest, which does not prevent you from editing the article - as long as your edits are neutral (see WP:NPOV) - but does provide tips on how to deal with the conflict. In severe problem cases, COI editors are advised not to edit the article directly, but to make suggestions on the talk page to be implemented by other un-conflicted editors. I don't think that's the case at the current time, but if you are connected with the church, you should be aware that the church should not attempt to control the content of the article. Wikipedia works by WP:CONSENSUS, and the article is not an extension of the church.

Anyway, that's just by way of letting you know what our policies are, I'm sure there won't be any problems. Do, however, explain your edits on the talk page if you continue to think they will improve the article. Best, BMK (talk) 01:12, 14 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Thank you BMK, the edits that I removed were edits I actually added. Just after I read the article, I thought that info may not be Neutral point of view. I am in not any way associated with the church. I am aware of policy on editing with a conflict of interest and if you believe the edits I removed which I had actually put there in the first place are okay to be in there, then great. Added to the article only because I had done some research on the history of the Bolton windows a couple years ago and was told the Wikipedia article had the wrong name. Since I was editing anyway, I added some more info. I only edit random articles I have done historical research on. Koheli (talk) 19:20, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Material can express an opinion as long as its sourced, and does not represent the editor's POV. BMK (talk) 19:22, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited James S. Vlasto, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Judiciary Committee. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:26, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Better source request for File:Homer wise wikipedia.jpg
Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia: You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete or generic. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact source (such as web page, or printed document) where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain, search engine, pinboard, aggregator, or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.
 * File:Homer wise wikipedia.jpg

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:54, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)